General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Justice for JFK [View all]stopbush
(24,396 posts)it would have been very difficult for the FBI or any other law enforcement agency to speak with him. Why, just locating what prison cell he was being kept in would have been a major undertaking. It wasn't like he was walking around freely in the public square where it would be easy to find him.
The problem with you CTists is that you have to go from one absurdity to another in your attempts to add a shred of credulity to your fantasies. On the other hand, you have mountains of evidence that you just choose to ignore because it's an inconvenient truth to the fantasies you spin.
Childish behavior, actually.
You make a claim that Ruby died shortly after killing Oswald. Obviously, you had no idea of the day he died on. You were just repeating some CT claptrap you heard at some point in your life. When the actual date of Ruby's death is pointed out to you, you haul out some other CT nonsense that has nothing at all to do with Ruby's date of death, as if screaming the claptrap louder covers for your ignorance on the date of death.
Think about it. On the one hand, you assert that Ruby killed Oswald ASAP because it's well known that "dead men tell no tales," so it's imperative to shut up an Oswald with all speed. But on the other hand, there's no rush to knock off Ruby after he kills Oswald. Well, then why did Oswald have to be killed off so quickly? If three years isn't a long time, why would the nefarious conspirators not leave Oswald alive for three years as well? After all, as you point out, it's difficult to speak to people in prison. If that's true for Ruby, why wouldn't it have been true for Oswald?
The convoluted thinking is stunning in its ineptitude.