Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: David Rothkopf: Supreme Court decision to hear immunity case "is outrageous and, at its heart, fundamentally corrupt" [View all]bluestarone
(17,216 posts)60. So, a court can't think?
Please STOP bashing Smith. For some reason your doing a lot of that?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
David Rothkopf: Supreme Court decision to hear immunity case "is outrageous and, at its heart, fundamentally corrupt" [View all]
highplainsdem
Feb 28
OP
All of us that aren't involved in prosecuting trump need to focus on ONE thing...
Think. Again.
Feb 28
#5
If you mean this a sarcasm, please use the :sarcasm: smilie. This is, as you know, untrue & outrageous
Hekate
Feb 28
#14
I have seen his other posts...I don't doubt he meant is sarcastically and likely went offline.
Demsrule86
Feb 28
#22
Arazi, the only reason I'm not alerting is that I think you mean this as sarcasm & haven't seen you spew this before
Hekate
Feb 28
#15
All too reminiscent of Sandra Day O'Connor and the 2000 election. December 2000 article:
highplainsdem
Feb 28
#26
We can thank McTurtle for getting us one step closer to ending our Democracy.
NoMoreRepugs
Feb 28
#18
The truth is we must save ourselves by voting against Trump. If he wins, we lose our Democracy.
Demsrule86
Feb 28
#19
Court will decide before the election, the case won't straddle two court terms, they don't do that.
thesquanderer
Feb 28
#37
Don't give up. Democracy is not something that can be earned. Apparently, it must be continually fought for.
Earth-shine
Feb 28
#31
Rothkopf -- another "expert" with no experience practicing law, let alone before the Supreme Court
onenote
Feb 28
#23
Yes. But the court could have issued a "refusal to hear" and let the lower court decision stand.
3Hotdogs
Feb 29
#51
Thumbing his nose and flipping the bird at Democracy, Mitch dissolves into the sunset... or is that HELL?
PTL_Mancuso
Feb 28
#36
Don't overlook the fact that the crazy maga judges love them some power! Tfg in a second term will do
PortTack
Feb 29
#43
So four justices think the lower court decision is wrong or needs clarifying?
Buckeyeblue
Feb 29
#47
Well, what a surprise. Not. And not an effing thing we can do to respond except to vote.
msfiddlestix
Feb 29
#56