Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: NY Times Op-Ed: Tax Wealth, Not Income [View all]WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)27. Well, there are a whole slew of retireees like me---from public education---who think this is a bad
idea.
But hey---at these no-interest rates, I'd put my $$ under my proverbial mattress.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
39 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yet this can be a problem esp. for elderly who own their house or farm yet have
SharonAnn
Nov 2012
#15
and we can't kill them either, obviously. That's why it's such a thorny problem.
librechik
Nov 2012
#34
aren't bank transfers over a certain amount, maybe $1K, already flagged? by homeland security? eom
amborin
Nov 2012
#37
AFAIK, that's already the case. Bank accounts have required your 'SS# or Tax ID#' for years.
freshwest
Nov 2012
#35
Most people I know have no saved wealth... the entire paycheck goes to bills...
Comrade_McKenzie
Nov 2012
#21
My 88-yr-old mother, as well. Lives really frugally, so she can have some U.S. bonds.
WinkyDink
Nov 2012
#28
The virtual elimination of the inheritance tax, something the Founders approved of, destroys that.
freshwest
Nov 2012
#36
Well, there are a whole slew of retireees like me---from public education---who think this is a bad
WinkyDink
Nov 2012
#27
I do find it fascinating that now that the top marginal rate is likely to go back to 39%
Warren DeMontague
Nov 2012
#32