Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
'Likely'? How about 'none'? randome Nov 2012 #1
Anonymous or not, anyone who has Rove looking over his shoulder... KansDem Nov 2012 #2
Wouldn't it be great if Rove was investigated? ProSense Nov 2012 #4
You keep saying this Fumesucker Nov 2012 #6
Wait, ProSense Nov 2012 #8
They are going to do what they are going to do Fumesucker Nov 2012 #9
Really? ProSense Nov 2012 #10
Not a reason Fumesucker Nov 2012 #11
While it would be great if this was true Drale Nov 2012 #3
Well there's the letter Mr. Mojo Risen Nov 2012 #5
Oh go take your risen mojo and get back on the blue bus to the weird gold mine with la woman Fumesucker Nov 2012 #7
Post removed Post removed Nov 2012 #12
Are you trying to say that Mitt actually won? Mr. Mojo Risen Nov 2012 #13
Clearly, they didn't need to flip votes... CanSocDem Nov 2012 #16
How could you know the "general liberalism" of the electorate? alcibiades_mystery Nov 2012 #17
I'm inclined to agree with you. n/t cherokeeprogressive Nov 2012 #14
That would be the icing on the cake! Rosa Luxemburg Nov 2012 #15
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»There is likely no eviden...»Reply #7