Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Yavin4

(35,589 posts)

16. She meant enforcing copyright. She wasn't being precise with her language.

Reply to Ms. Toad (Reply #11)

Sun Nov 12, 2023, 12:31 AM

Nov 2023

If AI can crank out new movies on demand, studios won't really bother enforcing copyright since doing so would be moot and impossible to track. If a million customized movies per hour are being made, it's impractical to enforce copyrights on them all.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Justine Bateman is NOT happy with the AI provisions negotiated by SAG-AFTRA. The agreement will put actors out of work [View all] highplainsdem Nov 2023 OP

It will be interesting to see what is actually in the agreement. LudwigPastorius Nov 2023 #1

Yes. But it's worrisome that they haven't released those details on AI yet. highplainsdem Nov 2023 #7

Ask the music industry about Napster gulliver Nov 2023 #2

I think that horse is out of the barn and a couple of states away by now. TwilightZone Nov 2023 #3

Justine ❤️ underpants Nov 2023 #4

I remember Delphinus Nov 2023 #5

I agree completely with what you wrote here: highplainsdem Nov 2023 #8

If the scumbag streaming companies would pay residuals then fine JanMichael Nov 2023 #6

She had the law wrong, so I'll withhold my opinion Ms. Toad Nov 2023 #9

I'm guessing she means they won't even bother to pay the small fee to register the copyright. highplainsdem Nov 2023 #10

I suspect she simply doesn't know the law. Ms. Toad Nov 2023 #11

that sounds so condescending orleans Nov 2023 #12

Yes. n/t Ms. Toad Nov 2023 #13

so then the whole copyright idea for AI generated material is moot since you have to be human to orleans Nov 2023 #14

She meant enforcing copyright. She wasn't being precise with her language. Yavin4 Nov 2023 #16

passive copyright doesn't apply to works created by generative AI, though, does it? fishwax Nov 2023 #18

she was once a very big star on television.......... DemocraticPatriot Nov 2023 #15

AI actually could be a good thing for the arts. Yavin4 Nov 2023 #17