Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
well, i find this comforting. anyone else? mopinko Aug 2023 #1
Creative input is necessary and it only gives a short blurb. joshcryer Aug 2023 #3
yes. in the right hands, mopinko Aug 2023 #4
Generative AI is unethical. See reply 6. highplainsdem Aug 2023 #7
yeah, there's that. but again- in the right hands. mopinko Aug 2023 #11
Disney has the rights to those scripts, artwork, actors' voices, etc., ONLY highplainsdem Aug 2023 #16
i didnt say it was free. mopinko Aug 2023 #17
IMO it's unethical to use generative AI trained on data sets of stolen intellectual property, highplainsdem Aug 2023 #6
I think that will be difficult to enforce. joshcryer Aug 2023 #12
Not sure I understand your last line. You think ownership of intellectual property highplainsdem Aug 2023 #13
Yes. joshcryer Aug 2023 #14
What about all the individual artists, writers, musicians, coders et al. whose highplainsdem Aug 2023 #15
I advocate the free dissemination of data. joshcryer Aug 2023 #18
"You can have all the power MorbidButterflyTat Aug 2023 #20
I would hate to see a world where most writers and artists use AI for fake creativity highplainsdem Aug 2023 #21
+1 MorbidButterflyTat Aug 2023 #19
AI-written books are already creating lots of problems for real writers: highplainsdem Aug 2023 #5
'Dr. Miles Stones'? Maybe with a forward by Flash Point? 70sEraVet Aug 2023 #2
Nice catch - went over my head. yonder Aug 2023 #10
So AI is not I enough to fool Progressive dog Aug 2023 #8
If this example of AI germplasm gains a toehold, yonder Aug 2023 #9
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'Nonfiction' Book About M...»Reply #4