Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: It would be nice if those DUers who [View all]malaise
(268,966 posts)18. No need for names
The question is why did you think it was going to be close?
Were you influenced by the lies and spin by ReTHUGs and M$Greedia.
Even so called liberal pundits were pushing this shit, but I have long suspected that they were merely earning their Christmas bonuses and playing it safe in case it was stolen. Their producers needed a horse race but there was nothing there - starting with Rmoney.
The Obama campaign is the most professional outfit I have ever seen and from the voter suppression was exposed early I knew they had this thing covered. Rove's shit was too old to work and men were way ahead of him this time.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I went by data. Not pundits. Those who thought he'd win a landslide, that was wishful thinking
Honeycombe8
Nov 2012
#26
Yes. About 1.5%. I hadn't realized it had gone up that much from FL. Election night it was 1%.nt
Honeycombe8
Nov 2012
#44
Let's see...the President wins by at least 3 mill pop vote and more than 100 EV....
OldDem2012
Nov 2012
#39
No - legitimacy is the view of citizens that the government rightfully earned its right to rule
malaise
Nov 2012
#19
I hope (against hope?) that Congress tackles this issue. The RIGHT to vote EASILY
Honeycombe8
Nov 2012
#31
I thought it was a slam dunk after the Dem Nat'l Convention. Then the 1st debate happened.
Honeycombe8
Nov 2012
#11
Only the media could push the view that one debate could decide the plethora of issues
malaise
Nov 2012
#21
I seem to recall that Romney lied and flip-flopped constantly during that first debate.....
OldDem2012
Nov 2012
#40
Yes, Romney lied. But the fact is....Obama lost. Yes, Romney's a lying SOS....
Honeycombe8
Nov 2012
#46
You weren't watching the same MSNBC I was watching during and after the 1st debate.
Honeycombe8
Nov 2012
#47
Yes, I watched those screamers at MSNBC and was horrified by their bad behavior.....
OldDem2012
Nov 2012
#57
No. The PEOPLE decide who won. Not fact checkers afterwards. Millions decided
Honeycombe8
Nov 2012
#63
The PEOPLE decide who won. If a debater lies, and the other debater doesn't call him on it...
Honeycombe8
Nov 2012
#66
I know you can't see this, but for the record: If you can't take facts, why are you in a forum like
Honeycombe8
Nov 2012
#60
Me, too. I just didn't dare dream he'd get over 300 EVs. But he didn't NEED to.
Honeycombe8
Nov 2012
#15
Election integrity concerns were valid, in view of the MSM narrative hyping a big Romney win.
proverbialwisdom
Nov 2012
#53
The hair on fire "we could lose" types got to me too. I was sick of their fear. nt
bluestate10
Nov 2012
#70