Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: FULL STOP! We now have enough evidence to put him away 10 times over [View all]NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)38. Ridiculous.
All of it. It's just so silly... impossible to know where to start.
What you're now admitting to or accepting
WTF is that supposed to mean? Admitting? The use of that charged word makes it sound as though you believe you've caught me in a lie... or a contradiction. Nothing could be further from the truth. Fact of the matter is this: I've never denied anything. I've always explained that this case is political.
Y'all can whine and gripe all you want, but it won't change anything.
and no, I don't expect people to be this openly honest
Okay. So what? Who cares what you expect? That's not sufficient justification to behave as if I've been LYING to you from the beginning and just now I'm suddenly telling you the truth (at long last). What good purpose does it serve to make those types of not-so-subtle backhanded insinuations about my honestly? Why do it? What kind of person does shit like that? I don't. And I don't deserve it either.
I don't agree with you on the principle of what the country is supposed to stand on when it comes to law.
Well, welcome to the real world. Surprise! It's not all lollipops, unicorns and rainbows. Not everything works in such an idealistic way, especially when it comes to indicting and prosecuting ex-POTUS's.
Such things will ALWAYS be political and I'm heartened by the fact that it indeed IS taking longer. I want it to be perfect. I want it to be airtight. He's going to have so much money and so many politicians and others to support him in ways that no other "common man" would have. This case needs to be good. It needs to be solid. It needs to be tight.
What y'all keep begging for is quick failure. I want slow and steady SUCCESS!
Do you want failure or success? You can't have both. Choose one. Quick failure, or slow-success! What will it be?
It's like that humorous (but true) sign that I used to see in various repair shops. It definitely applies here too!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
100 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
FULL STOP! We now have enough evidence to put him away 10 times over [View all]
Iwasthere
Feb 2022
OP
You don't know that they aren't doing their job. You're just impatient he's not arrested RIGHT NOW!
Fiendish Thingy
Feb 2022
#2
We agree on the desired outcome, just not the progress towards that outcome.
Fiendish Thingy
Feb 2022
#82
How about the facts she reports? She reports verifiable details no one else covers
Fiendish Thingy
Feb 2022
#92
The wheels of justice appear to grind very slowly for rich, white, powerful men.
Irish_Dem
Feb 2022
#3
I don't know why but I think he his gonna get nailed on his business practice more than
mitch96
Feb 2022
#4
Absolutely. I think one reason is those in power, as much as they may despise FORMER President
artemisia1
Feb 2022
#51
Lol full stop indeed. I think the DOJ might have some folks working on this (Nt)
FreepFryer
Feb 2022
#5
He admitted on video to firing Comey for investigating him, that's enough alone to charge him
uponit7771
Feb 2022
#18
He literally said on video he fired Comey because he was investigating him, that's STRAIGHT OOJ ...
uponit7771
Feb 2022
#12
Please don't gas light, its rude. He can fire who he needs to but not for illegal reasons like ...
uponit7771
Feb 2022
#19
+1, and the incitement anyone would be charged with was him telling the crowd to go to the capital
uponit7771
Feb 2022
#22
He can argue that, but without his virulent Senate supporters, it will be met with cold silence.
lagomorph777
Feb 2022
#34
Page 24; immediately before the cited text. Right near the end of the rant -er- speech.
lagomorph777
Feb 2022
#94
At minimum there's enough to *CHARGE* Putin's Whore with a crime, that's not done either.
uponit7771
Feb 2022
#11
It's only "complicated" in the minds of those afraid of going after the powerful
Silent3
Feb 2022
#46
Strawman, Putin's Whore could be charged with OOJ for firing Comey for investigating him ...
uponit7771
Feb 2022
#23
You know perfectly well that this is not any ordinary case. It's POLITICAL, and as a result...
NurseJackie
Feb 2022
#28
"It's POLITICAL,..." At least you're honest enough to say what everyone who's pissed at the DOJ
uponit7771
Feb 2022
#35
"Too bad. It is. Deal with it..." Nope, a more perfect union doesn't come if its just white males...
uponit7771
Feb 2022
#37
"WTF is that supposed to mean? Admitting? " Why do you sound so defensive man ?! I'm saying ...
uponit7771
Feb 2022
#40
Clearly that's the only solution to all the griping and tantrums that I'm observing.
NurseJackie
Feb 2022
#57
There's a well-known history that the DoJ can't keep investigations secret forever
Silent3
Feb 2022
#59
Apparently having straw men and binary thinking pointed out makes you sleepy n/t
Silent3
Feb 2022
#61
That's not for me to say. But what I can tell you is that it serves no good purpose...
NurseJackie
Feb 2022
#73
How about as, just a small example, over fifty days and counting for Mark Meadows...
Silent3
Feb 2022
#50