Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Justice matters.

(6,933 posts)
71. Replace Garland with "Acting" AG Glenn Kirschner
Tue Oct 19, 2021, 11:37 PM
Oct 2021
A experienced prosecutor for over 30 years will get the necessary job done to save Democracy and the Rule of Law.



Also, if the DOJ doesn't prosecute the orange terrorist on Obtruction of Justice and Witness Tampering The DOJ will be OK about the Obstruction of Justice allegations detailed in the Mueller Report, crimes Mueller himself confirmed he could be prosecuted for after he's no longer in the WH.
Thank god Adam is speaking out because we are for sure done for good if trump isnt pursued Eliot Rosewater Oct 2021 #1
Why? CrackityJones75 Oct 2021 #3
Because it gives a green light to the next criminal in the White House. Maraya1969 Oct 2021 #6
Have been plenty of criminals in the WH CrackityJones75 Oct 2021 #7
What threats to our Democracy through the history of the country do you think equal or Scrivener7 Oct 2021 #12
USSC deciding 2000 election. CrackityJones75 Oct 2021 #18
So you must understand how that weakened our Democracy. Scrivener7 Oct 2021 #23
My comment CrackityJones75 Oct 2021 #99
That was kinda the blatant opener... sprinkleeninow Oct 2021 #36
Oh I think Reagan and Nixon had some decent opening acts. CrackityJones75 Oct 2021 #111
Yes, and I almost referenced that far back. But many people were not strongly attuned mb sprinkleeninow Oct 2021 #118
Why do you say, "We"? And besides, it has to start somewhere and if we not start Maraya1969 Oct 2021 #15
Didn't say people shouldn't pay CrackityJones75 Oct 2021 #19
Never said we shouldn't make them pay. CrackityJones75 Oct 2021 #110
When was the last time that the inhabitant of the White House soldierant Oct 2021 #109
Exactly. smirkymonkey Oct 2021 #22
I don't think we have to wait for another more competent. triron Oct 2021 #49
Absolutely! Rebl2 Oct 2021 #53
I agree. He's been hitting on the head, as of late. He's lost some sugar coating. mjvpi Oct 2021 #9
Someone Zeitghost Oct 2021 #2
If Garland is actively investigating Trump's crimes, we'll know by what Schiff now does. Eyeball_Kid Oct 2021 #4
Exactly. Schiff is signalling from a place of informed knowledge msfiddlestix Oct 2021 #124
agree... agingdem Oct 2021 #24
WTF??? Schiff is in danger of being "overexposed"???? He is one of the few who is out there Scrivener7 Oct 2021 #100
overexposed?...yes agingdem Oct 2021 #103
SMDH. The only Democrat doing effective messaging and people are complaining. Scrivener7 Oct 2021 #104
that not true... agingdem Oct 2021 #105
What makes you assume Garland is being methodical and judicious? msfiddlestix Oct 2021 #125
denying Trump and his henchmen executive privilege... agingdem Oct 2021 #126
Watching the committee hearing right now msfiddlestix Oct 2021 #127
Bullshit. smirkymonkey Oct 2021 #29
Might as well take it to Deutche bank, gab13by13 Oct 2021 #35
This post states exactly what I think. Earth-shine Oct 2021 #44
I really wish I could dispute what you said, FoxNewsSucks Oct 2021 #46
My appologies Zeitghost Oct 2021 #57
Whoops! smirkymonkey Oct 2021 #63
Not at all Zeitghost Oct 2021 #72
I agree with you. Garland was a terrible choice for AG. Tacan Oct 2021 #65
Fear you are right but hope you are wrong. triron Oct 2021 #66
Replace Garland with "Acting" AG Glenn Kirschner Justice matters. Oct 2021 #71
So why would a liberal like Biden wnylib Oct 2021 #69
Honestly, I don't know. smirkymonkey Oct 2021 #82
Just speculation, but two parts of it might be ancianita Oct 2021 #88
The OP quote from the article wnylib Oct 2021 #107
I so agree that Garland will do nothing mrsadm Oct 2021 #108
Someone like Sally Yates. Orange Buffoon Oct 2021 #122
And we didn't know what Mueller was up to Ponietz Oct 2021 #42
He might still save us FoxNewsSucks Oct 2021 #48
Merry Fitzmas? BradAllison Oct 2021 #73
So, does the sarcasm emoji mean that wnylib Oct 2021 #80
I knew Garland was this from the start but people told me to believe. I am with Schiff. LizBeth Oct 2021 #5
He is a well meaning, moderate Republican. mjvpi Oct 2021 #13
Yes mzmolly Oct 2021 #39
An Acting AG with 30 years experience prosecuting and getting results. Justice matters. Oct 2021 #74
Thanks for the link. Yes, what he said! mjvpi Oct 2021 #98
Why in Hell did Obama want a Republican on the Supreme Court? whathehell Oct 2021 #116
+1000 smirkymonkey Oct 2021 #119
I wish Schiff was Attorney General. calimary Oct 2021 #64
Here's available and willing "Acting" AG with 30 years of experience prosecuting and getting results Justice matters. Oct 2021 #75
Glenn Kirschner or Sally Yates would both be on my short list. lagomorph777 Oct 2021 #92
Seems like Schiff thinks there is not a lot going on behind the scenes. Scrivener7 Oct 2021 #8
If you know otherwise, please inform the us. BlueIdaho Oct 2021 #14
Why would I know otherwise? My observation is that there is no evidence much is going on, Scrivener7 Oct 2021 #16
Sorry Mate BlueIdaho Oct 2021 #20
I figured. No problem. Scrivener7 Oct 2021 #21
there it is again, DAMMIT Grasswire2 Oct 2021 #10
We can look forward to catastrophe if we continue the laissez-faire approach. lagomorph777 Oct 2021 #93
Post removed Post removed Oct 2021 #11
Indeed! Duppers Oct 2021 #17
I fully support Merrick Garland. I believe that Merrick Garland fully supports the Jan 6 Committee. ancianita Oct 2021 #25
You have it backwards, gab13by13 Oct 2021 #28
It is the purpose of the Select Committee to wnylib Oct 2021 #79
Yes, but the Select Committee cannot do a CRIMINAL investigation. lagomorph777 Oct 2021 #95
I agree. Garland didn't just fall off the turnip truck, he's an experienced legal mind. George II Oct 2021 #38
So is John Yoo. Grasswire2 Oct 2021 #60
Really? You got me checking him out ... Unlike Garland, Yoo has been under international attack. ancianita Oct 2021 #67
Good post! burrowowl Oct 2021 #85
I agree DashOneBravo Oct 2021 #45
Thank you Adam Schiff gab13by13 Oct 2021 #26
Schiff knows what's up. Lucky Luciano Oct 2021 #27
+1000 smirkymonkey Oct 2021 #31
What really pisses me off, gab13by13 Oct 2021 #33
Yup. lagomorph777 Oct 2021 #96
Isn't "looking back" pretty much the main job of the DOJ? Walleye Oct 2021 #30
It's his right to disagree, and I think Schiff is one of the best Democrats in the House, but.... George II Oct 2021 #32
I can't help but remember that Garland FoxNewsSucks Oct 2021 #40
He was confirmed 70-30. 48 Democrats, 2 Independents, 20 republicans George II Oct 2021 #50
I was referring to his SCOTUS nomination FoxNewsSucks Oct 2021 #51
They probably said that just to get the nomination on the record for them to block.... George II Oct 2021 #55
No doubt about that, FoxNewsSucks Oct 2021 #58
Good for Adam Schiff.... spanone Oct 2021 #34
Garland allowed a Trump backed Cyber Ninja phony group, gab13by13 Oct 2021 #61
Here's a suggestion for an "Acting" AG with 30+ years experience prosecuting and getting results Justice matters. Oct 2021 #76
The application of ALL criminal justice is retrospective Mr. Ected Oct 2021 #37
That "look forward not back" bullshit has always infuriated me FoxNewsSucks Oct 2021 #41
I agree Dirty Socialist Oct 2021 #47
It's actually a successful republicon tactic FoxNewsSucks Oct 2021 #54
In 180 days, ancianita Oct 2021 #70
Ok, but there are crimes we all saw evidence of, Mueller saw evidence of, and said when no longer Justice matters. Oct 2021 #78
Yes it does. ancianita Oct 2021 #83
Perfect! True Blue American Oct 2021 #123
+1000 smirkymonkey Oct 2021 #84
It is patently absurd. smirkymonkey Oct 2021 #120
AG/republiQan, looking forward.... sprinkleeninow Oct 2021 #43
DOJ is going to have to save our democracy, gab13by13 Oct 2021 #52
He can't plead the 5th, thanks to Trump's pardon. lagomorph777 Oct 2021 #97
Garland is looking more and more like a secret Trumpy. Kablooie Oct 2021 #56
I don't think Garland is a Trump supporter--I just think he doesn't want to make waves Poiuyt Oct 2021 #77
I think he just doesn't get it. Doesn't understand what the real stakes are. Crunchy Frog Oct 2021 #81
I am still in a 'wait and see what shakes out mode'. I do not have blind faith in Garland though, Celerity Oct 2021 #59
A 68 year old white guy, worth $20 million, Harvard grad, taking it easy on Repugs. Jon King Oct 2021 #62
The reticence is bewildering after Nixon RANDYWILDMAN Oct 2021 #68
K&R UCmeNdc Oct 2021 #86
I wish Rep. Schiff could replace Garland. Roisin Ni Fiachra Oct 2021 #87
Glen Kirschner acting AG has a nice ring to it. Tribetime Oct 2021 #89
He's No Trumpster colsohlibgal Oct 2021 #90
Schiff is correct. Ignore these crimes and kiss America good-bye. lagomorph777 Oct 2021 #91
I don't understand this, it appears to be a political decision. That phone call was so BeckyDem Oct 2021 #94
And, Garland Works For Which Politician? ProfessorGAC Oct 2021 #106
I think all of these people should be prosecuted, convicted and punished Texin Oct 2021 #101
OK Garland, prove you are not complicit with Dumpy Wild blueberry Oct 2021 #102
Wow fool me once, fool me twice, fool me again. What's with Garland? housecat Oct 2021 #112
I think he was only picked only because of the supreme court.. Texaswitchy Oct 2021 #113
Oh that Adam Schiff stirring it up! What does he KNOW about Criminal Investigations? msfiddlestix Oct 2021 #114
Garland seems to be. Snackshack Oct 2021 #115
Some of us thought Garland was working on it bucolic_frolic Oct 2021 #117
Schiff is a good man SunImp Oct 2021 #121
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Schiff 'vehemently' disag...»Reply #71