Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
13. Seems like a good formula
Sat Oct 20, 2012, 12:29 AM
Oct 2012

But, after decades of cultivating hate for people who have anything to do with government assistance, I find it difficult to believe that some of the people who need it most would respond. So many people are blind with anger and the best measure we have is the lack of outrage at the 47% comment.

From my experiences talking to people who are middle class and below, I really believe that anger at banksters and wall st. has been redirected toward anyone who fits the stereotype that has been identified by mitt and the republicans for decades. What better way to pay the spite forward than to support someone who they know will screw people less fortunate, whose lives seem not to have changed as much over. See, some of the elderly and disabled didn't have as much to lose and therefore have weathered this thing out better than middle class. We are the obvious targets.

This is a totally different time. We can't undo the damage republicans have done to the American psyche. Even if it was present after the depression, it could not be mobilized the way it can be now. Hate can be organized and mobilized in today's world. I also do think there were more people who cared about their neighbors than there are now. Thus FDR's 4 terms.
I don't know what the solutions are, but I think it will take more creativity and possibly more time before people will accept anything resembling what we saw succeed in the past.

The average IQ is 100. RagAss Oct 2012 #1
And amazingly, about half are less than that! Care Acutely Oct 2012 #16
I agree about the 47%. Revolutionary Girl Oct 2012 #2
Sadly it's not always stupidity loyalsister Oct 2012 #12
I know we like to believe people do not think critically, but for the most part they would not still_one Oct 2012 #3
Ok so I'm not alone- ruffburr Oct 2012 #4
Doesn't Robme always wear a swastika? I thought he did. man4allcats Oct 2012 #5
I'd like to call it Idiocracy, but that doesn't explain why these same people jump on Obama Zalatix Oct 2012 #10
You make a valid point. man4allcats Oct 2012 #14
he could slaughter baby and at worst it will SmileyRose Oct 2012 #6
I think the Democrat needs to have a more populist economic program so people see a clear choice. limpyhobbler Oct 2012 #7
You have some very good points. Zalatix Oct 2012 #11
Seems like a good formula loyalsister Oct 2012 #13
We've been there before... twice. Zalatix Oct 2012 #15
I'm not really particularly outraged at that 47% thing. limpyhobbler Oct 2012 #17
The party has shifted to the right, and declared the Left a bunch of loonies, alarmists, what-have-u Zalatix Oct 2012 #18
It is really stumpifying. lonestarnot Oct 2012 #8
It's sooo ugly that money is "free speech" mucifer Oct 2012 #9
The idea that a significant number of voters are still undecided is ludicrous. porphyrian Oct 2012 #19
If He Really Did That His Support Would Drop To Around Thirty Percent DemocratSinceBirth Oct 2012 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Let us be realistic, ladi...»Reply #13