Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Celerity

(43,406 posts)
50. wealth equality is the number one interlocking stat that determines the overall well-being of a
Sat Mar 13, 2021, 07:21 AM
Mar 2021

nation state.

Great video explaining this (and this is from 10 years ago, it has only gotten worse in the US)

How economic inequality harms societies | Richard Wilkinson




If it is a 'losing' issue then we are headed down a nightmarish path. The issue is not just about billionaires (Bezos is worth over 60 THOUSAND times more than Sanders) versus the rest, it is about the incredibly unequal distribution amongst the 332 million Americans. The top 1% percent in the United States now have more wealth than the bottom 90 percent combined, they have 15 times more wealth than the bottom 50%.

The concentration of wealth at the top, and the resultant lack of wealth of the vast numbers not at the top is staggering and growing worse yearly (and that was before COVID-19). The US has the 2nd lowest upward social mobility of any OECD nation. Only the UK is worse. The myth of the US as the land of the best opportunities to move up is one of the biggest scams being pushed for decades. You are FAR less likely to move up from the bottom in the US than in almost every other advanced nation. A few years back the GINI co-efficient (measurement of wealth equality) of the US was 139th (meaning 138 nation had more equal wealth distributions). 138th on the list, so one above the US was Iran. The higher the GINI, the less equal the wealth is distributed. Here is another GINI listing (Togo has now passed the US as well) done by Statista: (their total co-efficient numbers are not not exactly the same as the World Bank and OECD ratings, which is discussed in the NBC news article below)

https://www.statista.com/forecasts/1171540/gini-index-by-country




Most Americans couldn't cover a $1,000 financial emergency, survey finds

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/financial-emergency-savings-americans-cover

Fewer than 4 in 10 Americans have enough money set aside to cover an unexpected $1,000 expense, such as a trip to the ER or car repairs, according to a new survey.


U.S. income inequality at highest level in 50 years, economic gap growing in heartland

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/u-s-income-inequality-highest-level-50-years-economic-gap-n1058956

ORLANDO, Fla. — The gap between the haves and have-nots in the United States grew last year to its highest level in more than 50 years of tracking income inequality, according to Census Bureau figures.

Income inequality in the United States expanded from 2017 to 2018, with several heartland states among the leaders of the increase, even though several wealthy coastal states still had the most inequality overall, according to figures released Thursday by the U.S. Census Bureau.

The nation's Gini Index, which measures income inequality, has been rising steadily over the past five decades.

The Gini Index grew from 0.482 in 2017 to 0.485 last year, according to the bureau's 1-year American Community Survey data. The Gini Index is on a scale of 0 to 1; a score of "0'' indicates perfect equality, while a score of "1'' indicates perfect inequality, where one household has all the income.


K&R! nt Guy Whitey Corngood Mar 2021 #1
What of the billionaires? Will no one think of the billionaires? Cirque du So-What Mar 2021 #2
We've been here before, it was called the Gilded Age. sop Mar 2021 #3
Hopefully, the filthy rich will refer to this era ... Jopin Klobe Mar 2021 #22
Good point, and an appropriate reference for the actions required. LastDemocratInSC Mar 2021 #23
THIS! malaise Mar 2021 #53
DURec leftstreet Mar 2021 #4
Yes! Thank you. nt crickets Mar 2021 #5
Tax Them Like Working People DanieRains Mar 2021 #6
The UK Wealth Tax Commission receommends a one-time 5% tax on all net worth over 500k GBP WarGamer Mar 2021 #63
I have no problem in principle with that but Disaffected Mar 2021 #70
Hell yes! BigmanPigman Mar 2021 #7
Get off my lawn! taxi Mar 2021 #8
Jeff Bezos turns down Bernie's invitation to speak on income inequality next week Arazi Mar 2021 #9
In my opinion income inequality is a losing issue Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2021 #10
I once worked for the highest paid CEO in America... (John Hammergren, McKesson) mac2766 Mar 2021 #24
So let's get rid of the minimum wage and install a maximum Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2021 #25
Well... that's nowhere near what I said. mac2766 Mar 2021 #32
Those taking $143 million are exercising stock options. Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2021 #39
I agree. mac2766 Mar 2021 #40
I would do it the other way around DFW Mar 2021 #55
That's obscene. smirkymonkey Mar 2021 #49
Look up the word obscene Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2021 #58
I did. smirkymonkey Mar 2021 #59
My mind is in the gutter? Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2021 #67
I am so done with you. smirkymonkey Mar 2021 #72
wealth equality is the number one interlocking stat that determines the overall well-being of a Celerity Mar 2021 #50
Thank you for putting this together. scipan Mar 2021 #60
Disagree. WarGamer Mar 2021 #64
And I agree with you. ShazzieB Mar 2021 #68
Let them eat cake - urinal cake Mr. Ected Mar 2021 #11
+++ Well said. KPN Mar 2021 #17
THIS. People who have accumulated this much money are UNDERTAXED. crickets Mar 2021 #29
Hell, yes! zentrum Mar 2021 #12
Not Optional Roy Rolling Mar 2021 #13
Yes. Blue_true Mar 2021 #34
I remember back when he couldn't tolerate millionaires AND billionaires. Now just billionaires? George II Mar 2021 #14
"I wrote a best-selling book. If you write a best-selling book, you can be a millionaire, too." speak easy Mar 2021 #16
Plenty. Just not a big enough platform to sell them from. MrsCoffee Mar 2021 #28
How about a best selling book about how to write a best selling book ? speak easy Mar 2021 #33
You should run for office. George II Mar 2021 #37
Funny that, eh? I s'pose ethics is sliding scale once the millions are banked. LanternWaste Mar 2021 #18
I agree with his synopsis that vastly concentrated wealth is unsustainable, Blue_true Mar 2021 #35
Well, Twitter does have a character limit. Do you agree with what he said about billionaires? Violet_Crumble Mar 2021 #38
Times change. Yesterday's millionaires are today's billionaires... Violet_Crumble Mar 2021 #44
The times didn't change all that fast. Back in 2016 there were 10.8 million millionaires... George II Mar 2021 #57
Just leave the millionaires alone!!!! MrsCoffee Mar 2021 #74
... betsuni Mar 2021 #51
Same as it was just about a century ago... Ford_Prefect Mar 2021 #15
We're not much further than that, I will agree FakeNoose Mar 2021 #27
It has been this way several times in history. Blue_true Mar 2021 #36
The pattern is similar I agree. The possible outcome isn't. Ford_Prefect Mar 2021 #42
I wouldn't mind it so much except that money power. Goodheart Mar 2021 #19
I hear ya, Bernie! OldBaldy1701E Mar 2021 #20
We should. But the political will isn't there, even with Democrats LiberalLovinLug Mar 2021 #21
Damn straight, Bernie. Dagstead Bumwood Mar 2021 #26
Exactly how does one prevent a person from becoming very wealthy? Blue_true Mar 2021 #30
He could have stopped at ... Xoan Mar 2021 #31
Is breaking up tech giants like breaking up big banks? betsuni Mar 2021 #41
I disagree with Bernie EndlessWire Mar 2021 #43
He's a millionaire because he wrote a best-selling book, not because he was exploiting workers . . . wackadoo wabbit Mar 2021 #45
Amazon. betsuni Mar 2021 #46
I don't care about EndlessWire Mar 2021 #47
Are you seriously asking me what I know about the exploitation of workers? wackadoo wabbit Mar 2021 #56
First off, I am entitled to have an opinion.. EndlessWire Mar 2021 #61
this is more than a bit misleading, it would take over 60 THOUSAND Sanders to equal ONE Bezos Celerity Mar 2021 #48
"and no one advocates limiting HIS wealth." I do. nt JanMichael Mar 2021 #69
Ridiculous. He thinks there should be limits on wealth? Totally absurd! NurseJackie Mar 2021 #52
There already are de facto limits on wealth for the VAST majority of Americans. It is called the US Celerity Mar 2021 #54
absolutely... and the vast majority of Americans agree. WarGamer Mar 2021 #62
Part good idea. Part terrible strategy and worse than terrible sales technique. gulliver Mar 2021 #65
Us working stiffs are sick and tired of being stiffed!!! oasis Mar 2021 #66
Question: how much are they allowed to have? brooklynite Mar 2021 #71
'care work done by poor women is worth 10.8 trillion US dollars: 3X bigger than whole tech industry' Donkees Mar 2021 #73
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sanders: In my view, we c...»Reply #50