Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: (Suze Orman)Apparently Poor & Middle Class People Shouldn't Have Babies [View all]Brickbat
(19,339 posts)20. Forgoing a second child will not solve their income/spending problem. She should address that first.
I didn't watch the video, so maybe she did.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
(Suze Orman)Apparently Poor & Middle Class People Shouldn't Have Babies [View all]
The Straight Story
Dec 2011
OP
Many, many people work on different shifts and their families do just fine. It takes a lot of extra
Brickbat
Dec 2011
#12
they may want their child to have siblings to grow up with, to teach, to learn from, etc.
CreekDog
Dec 2011
#22
"Their expenses are $6500/mo. They make $5600/mo" Obviously that's not working.
alphafemale
Dec 2011
#3
Your response illustrates what (for me) is so despicable about those contemplating having children
Uranus Needs Men
Dec 2011
#11
Forgoing a second child will not solve their income/spending problem. She should address that first.
Brickbat
Dec 2011
#20
They are running $900 in the red every month. Until they can get that straightened out,
iris27
Dec 2011
#21
I agree, though I haven't read her exact words. It's much more expensive to have children
napi21
Dec 2011
#26