Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Celerity

(43,655 posts)
56. the last time Pryor won against a Republican opponent was 2002
Fri Jun 26, 2020, 02:24 AM
Jun 2020

Arkansas is now cherry red, unfortunately, at least at Senate race level. Biden is polling quite well against the orange anus atm though.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Pryor#U.S._Senate

In late 2001, Pryor announced his candidacy for the Senate seat held by Tim Hutchinson, who six years earlier had become the first Arkansas Republican to serve in that body since Reconstruction. The seat had been held by his father David Pryor (also a former Arkansas governor), who actively campaigned for his son. Pryor defeated Hutchinson 54% to 46% and was the only Democratic candidate for the Senate to defeat a Republican incumbent in that election cycle.

Pryor won reelection in 2008 without a Republican opponent. There had been speculation that former Governor Mike Huckabee would run against Pryor if his presidential bid was unsuccessful, but on March 8, Huckabee said he would not contest the race. The only Republican to express interest in the race, health care executive Tom Formicola, decided not to run. Pryor's only announced opponent was Green Party candidate Rebekah Kennedy, whom he defeated 80% to 20%.

Pryor ran for reelection to a third term in 2014, against Republican U.S. House Rep. Tom Cotton. In March 2014, during an MSNBC news segment regarding the Senate race, Pryor said that Cotton gave off a "sense of entitlement" to a seat in the Senate due to his service in the military. After receiving much criticism for the remark, Pryor later said he was not attacking Cotton’s military service, but his perceived lack of accomplishments in the House: "But the point remains that he's been in the House now for a little over a year, he hasn't passed any legislation. There's not one thing he's done for Arkansas." FactCheck.org called two ads aired by Pryor's 2014 Senate campaign misleading in their criticisms of Paul Ryan's Medicare plan, supported by his opponent. Pryor lost to Cotton by a 57% to 39% margin.

The Democratic challenger dropped out two hours after the filing deadline. Patterson Jun 2020 #1
yeah. so now we have an independent who could be formidable if he gets on the ballot jorgevlorgan Jun 2020 #2
A pro-Bernie Independent will be formidable in Arkansas? brooklynite Jun 2020 #18
crazy right? jorgevlorgan Jun 2020 #20
But he's not... brooklynite Jun 2020 #23
If Booker wins against mcconnell, will you concede I'm right? jorgevlorgan Jun 2020 #26
I wouldn't count on *anyone* being competitive against McConnell. Trump voters will be out in force DTomlinson Jun 2020 #29
itll be tough, but competitive to me is anybody who is able to recruit jorgevlorgan Jun 2020 #32
Competitive to me is being able to win or make it a close race... brooklynite Jun 2020 #35
polling is not everything. jorgevlorgan Jun 2020 #38
Polling ISN'T everything...if the race is relatively close brooklynite Jun 2020 #39
anybody can realistically beat somebody, usually jorgevlorgan Jun 2020 #42
"anybody can realistically beat somebody, usually" brooklynite Jun 2020 #45
that same poll that shows Booker down 14 has McGrath down 20 versus Moscow Mitch Celerity Jun 2020 #55
This message was self-deleted by its author DTomlinson Jun 2020 #25
To be honest, I think the "Democratic" label is often what scares some people away. DTomlinson Jun 2020 #24
To spend more time with the spouse and kids? Or was it some underhanded and dishonest... NurseJackie Jun 2020 #3
I think there was something about a scandal that was brought to light jorgevlorgan Jun 2020 #5
Vetting is important. NurseJackie Jun 2020 #6
Yeah... jorgevlorgan Jun 2020 #7
It's not like anyone's lining up to be led to slaughter RhodeIslandOne Jun 2020 #41
WTF? Bring back Howard Dean and the 50-state project. dawg day Jun 2020 #4
Democrats had the seat with Mark Pryor sarisataka Jun 2020 #9
which shows that the seat is winnable. jorgevlorgan Jun 2020 #10
the last time Pryor won against a Republican opponent was 2002 Celerity Jun 2020 #56
Thank you. I get a laugh at the liberals who talk about the 50 state strategy. Drunken Irishman Jun 2020 #30
You'd rather have Cotton? dawg day Jun 2020 #51
No. But a lot on the left seemed indifferent to Pryor's loss. Drunken Irishman Jun 2020 #54
Who decided they didn't need him and who let the seat go? SharonClark Jun 2020 #34
He voted against the universal background check bill sarisataka Jun 2020 #48
Howard Dean's 50-state approach should never have been dropped. nt crickets Jun 2020 #21
It wasn't dropped. This is ridiculous, revisionist history. Drunken Irishman Jun 2020 #31
We seem to have different memories. crickets Jun 2020 #36
There's no different memories. There's the right - and there's the wrong. Drunken Irishman Jun 2020 #46
It has to be implemented correctly TheFarseer Jun 2020 #40
Field someone. dawg day Jun 2020 #52
That would mean running some right wing democrat JI7 Jun 2020 #49
Or a super progressive dawg day Jun 2020 #53
People want to know how Sgent Jun 2020 #8
we did run someone qazplm135 Jun 2020 #11
maybe my question is why was he the only one? jorgevlorgan Jun 2020 #12
Probably because no one else wanted to run? qazplm135 Jun 2020 #13
True. But recruitment efforts usually involve some persuasion, and a state with 3 million people jorgevlorgan Jun 2020 #14
they did have someone interested... qazplm135 Jun 2020 #15
again, they could have recruited more than one. jorgevlorgan Jun 2020 #16
if you want to cite vetting sure ok qazplm135 Jun 2020 #17
vet, and keep recruiting. if the vetting comes out poorly, recruit harder. jorgevlorgan Jun 2020 #22
In a bright red state TheFarseer Jun 2020 #43
in this case we just needed a warm body. jorgevlorgan Jun 2020 #44
False. Drunken Irishman Jun 2020 #33
Umm.... Sgent Jun 2020 #47
No. The DSCC and DCCC did a bulk of the heavy lifting. Drunken Irishman Jun 2020 #50
What a failure not to have a challenger rockfordfile Jun 2020 #19
Can a write in candidate win if they receive enough votes? tavernier Jun 2020 #27
yes. he is filing as a write in candidate just in case he doesn't get on the ballot jorgevlorgan Jun 2020 #28
Unacceptable superpatriotman Jun 2020 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Democrats do not have a c...»Reply #56