Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(4,450 posts)

5. Yes, as re-packaged by a former Harvard professor.

Fri Jan 31, 2020, 11:48 PM

Jan 2020

Problem is, the US Senate just said it's A-OK.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The way I read the Dershowitz Precedent is this: [View all] Still In Wisconsin Jan 2020 OP

Yes it is... pangaia Jan 2020 #1

It's not a precedent. klook Jan 2020 #2

It won't be "precedent" when a Democrat in the WH does it. no_hypocrisy Jan 2020 #3

The end justifies the means argument. nt Xipe Totec Jan 2020 #4

Yes, as re-packaged by a former Harvard professor. Still In Wisconsin Jan 2020 #5