Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KY_EnviroGuy

(14,490 posts)
6. Do you really feel it's appropriate for members of an internet blog....
Thu Jan 16, 2020, 04:25 AM
Jan 2020

to determine what actions are impeachable, particularly considering there's no precedence in past Congressional action or even in case law for members of Congress to draw on for guidance?

There's nothing I find in the Constitution's articles on impeachment that mentions emoluments violations. What it does include is actions of bribery by foreign entities. Do you really think Congress during an impeachment trial could prove without doubt that a president or other government employee was bribed say, by Russia? Republicans choose their co-conspirators carefully.

In addition, no rational person would believe that a Rethug-majority Senate would convict based on emoluments violations. They are the party of laissez-faire everything - you want basic healthcare? Tough shit. You upset 'cause billionaires pay no taxes? Tough shit. Upset because a president makes money off foreign visitors? Tough shit. That's the Republican way of life.

Even though Trump and his family's actions are extremely repugnant to any good citizen, I think our Democratic leadership knows Republicans would make a circus of any attempt to impeach based on emoluments.

Are you aware that there's currently three court cases against the Trumps relating to these issues?

Thank you! I've wondered about this too. DemocracyMouse Jan 2020 #1
Yes! Count me in as a member of the Against Normalizing Trump club. ArtTownsend Jan 2020 #2
Oh hell yes, count me in. When do these arthritisR_US Jan 2020 #9
Agreed. Trump should be impeached for his crimes on a monthly basis. Doodley Jan 2020 #3
On a monthly basis? JFC that's insane. arthritisR_US Jan 2020 #10
I'm guessing Nancy thought this was too nebulous/misunderstood/legally weak. NCLefty Jan 2020 #4
I'm afraid there is not much time left to arthritisR_US Jan 2020 #12
That's a strangely distant way to talk about it. NCLefty Jan 2020 #13
I never talked about "my" democracy, please tell arthritisR_US Jan 2020 #14
I'm presuming that Lefty is thinking you're from the USA, when you're actually not? mr_lebowski Jan 2020 #16
Ok, that's fair. I am Canadian but I care arthritisR_US Jan 2020 #19
I wonder this daily nt intrepidity Jan 2020 #5
Do you really feel it's appropriate for members of an internet blog.... KY_EnviroGuy Jan 2020 #6
Because he's stonewalling his financials...nt Wounded Bear Jan 2020 #7
It's the KISS principle. LastLiberal in PalmSprings Jan 2020 #8
Exactly - way too complicated StarfishSaver Jan 2020 #15
Another angle is that the current impeachment is, in part at least, a foreign emoluments case ... mr_lebowski Jan 2020 #18
I've been wondering that myself. Nt raccoon Jan 2020 #11
Article 1, abuse of power Hermit-The-Prog Jan 2020 #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why hasn't Trump been imp...»Reply #6