Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: ***IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY HEARING NOV 19 THREAD 4*** [View all]crickets
(25,980 posts)42. He doesn't want the answers. He just wants his talking points. So blatant.
"Let's establish your role and title." Then puts words in V.'s mouth and is incredibly insulting, at length. Demeaning the witness is going to blow back on them.
Rhetorical question, since when have "support the troops!" Repubs become so derogatory toward the military?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
112 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Republicans: SUPPORT THE TROOPS !!! Unless they're being honest about Trumps crimes
uponit7771
Nov 2019
#1
Terri Sewell (D-AL) getting clarifications on Ghouliani as a "non-government" employee involved
BumRushDaShow
Nov 2019
#2
Yup and he thought he was being slick but the answer was not what he wanted out there
BumRushDaShow
Nov 2019
#19
"Thank you for your service, why are you such a loser?" is a curious strategy.
TwilightZone
Nov 2019
#14
Carson back - now questioning... asking about Bolton cutting meeting short
BumRushDaShow
Nov 2019
#18
Wenstrub now apparently blaming Lt Col Vindman from reporting the improprieties of the call
Roland99
Nov 2019
#31
GOP tactic: Discredit first hand witnesses, thereby making hearsay witnesses irrelevant n/t
Blaukraut
Nov 2019
#41
Chris Stewart (R-UT) insulting Vindman for wearing his uniform and demanding he be addressed by rank
BumRushDaShow
Nov 2019
#45
Stewart trying to put words in Vindman's mouth re: VP Biden's demand of Ukraine to fire prosecutor
Roland99
Nov 2019
#60
trying to rattle the Vindman by diminishing him, his uniform, his title, & interpretations
AnotherMother4Peace
Nov 2019
#80
Quigley establishing that no one was in support of withholding the aid to Ukraine
BumRushDaShow
Nov 2019
#67
Impugning Hunter Biden by association...altho Burisma crimes were from before his tenure there
Roland99
Nov 2019
#82
Explaining that the fact they didn't use the term bribery doesn't mean that's not what the crime is
Roland99
Nov 2019
#99
He's nailed the evidentiary basis of any eyewitness that leads to THE legal term, bribery.
ancianita
Nov 2019
#100
So Dems can't call a crime "bribery" but the president can call that crime "policy."
ancianita
Nov 2019
#103
Hurd is just taking up time...again...a series of comments and questions unrelated to trump's crimes
Roland99
Nov 2019
#108
Hurd to Vindman "Is it known that Drumpf doesn't always stick to a script?"
BumRushDaShow
Nov 2019
#106