Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(9,263 posts)

5. they have NO reason to comply as NO accountability is in place

Fri Nov 8, 2019, 10:47 AM

Nov 2019

not the way I would go about trying to take down a king

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY: Another White House official refuses to testify! [View all] real Cannabis calm Nov 2019 OP

That's true! But, real Cannabis calm Nov 2019 #3

This was a setup StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #2

Definitely. Mike 03 Nov 2019 #4

You are probably correct. But, how can he be charged with obstruction... real Cannabis calm Nov 2019 #6

They're not trying to charge him. Trump's the target. StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #8

they have NO reason to comply as NO accountability is in place beachbumbob Nov 2019 #5

How do you see Inherent Contempt playing out to ensure accountability and StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #9

Sorry but NO. It was used in the past and upheld by SCOTUS. eos. triron Nov 2019 #11

In other words, you can't explain how it would work StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #12