Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Just a thought: Calling & losing a House vote for impeachment would be catastrophic [View all]ehrnst
(32,640 posts)63. Well the negative consequences must be considered.
It's not like we have nothing to lose by impeaching, and need to balance that with what can be gained. We could lose any chance of taking back the Senate. Taking back the Senate and keeping the House is vital to reversing Trump's damage. What happened to Democratic Senators in Red States during the Kavanaugh confirmation vote should be a lesson.
https://beta.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2018/09/20/democratic-senators-in-red-states-are-in-a-lose-lose-situation/
For me, that question is like asking whether it was worth it to prosecute George Zimmerman for murdering Trayvon Martin. After all, the jury was likely to be full of racist gun humpers who would acquit him.
First off, impeachment is not a judicial proceeding, it's a political one. It has no power whatsoever to stop him or punish him from doing anything. A shooting is different, because it's a judicial proceeding, there is no real option other than to proceed with a criminal trial process within the judicial system.
And yes, I do think a losing vote would be an effective way to respond to Trump's crimes.
What "justice" do you think will come from an impeachment? Knowing that it won't lead to shortening his term by a single minute, nor will it stop him from doing anything that he's doing now. Knowing that it will completely energize/enrage his supporters, who would not believe a single thing that Democratic leaders reveal in impeachment hearings - just like they did with the Mueller testimony.
Again - there are reasons that even you must admit that we don't impeach Kavanaugh right now, even though it would 'respond' to Mitch stealing a SCOTUS seat from Obama. We don't do it because we know that it won't do a damn bit of good even if we could remove him, because Trump can just replace him with someone worse and we still couldn't block the nomination.
It's not always black/white win/lose.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
88 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Just a thought: Calling & losing a House vote for impeachment would be catastrophic [View all]
ehrnst
Sep 2019
OP
EVERYONE should read your post. That's the backstory that many hotheads don't get. Democrats
OnDoutside
Sep 2019
#14
Yep, and this SCOTUS sure as HELL isn't going to invalidate executive privilege. (nt)
ehrnst
Sep 2019
#64
"Super frustrated" isn't reason enough to possibly end our chances of taking back the Senate in 2020
ehrnst
Sep 2019
#67
People remember Clinton's impeachment, and I think that's what they are thinking of. (nt)
ehrnst
Sep 2019
#58
The idea that if the opposing party can do damage to a POTUS for lying about a blow job
ehrnst
Sep 2019
#71
"I don't think there's any way that tRUMP and his minions will survive investigations utilizing
ehrnst
Sep 2019
#74
right. Impeachment is a potential solution at the end of a process. We need to enter and/or
wiggs
Sep 2019
#87
You may not think it will fail, but Pelosi does and I gotta go with her on this one
StarfishSaver
Sep 2019
#34
So there's nothing to be done other than holding a losing vote on impeachment and
ehrnst
Sep 2019
#17
Investigate now. Televised hearings now. Basically what Nadler et al are gearing up to do.
Hekate
Sep 2019
#13
Yes, I think that we forget that those in congress, even in swing districts must be responsive
ehrnst
Sep 2019
#19
The Nixon impeachment hearings weren't televised, so they didn't affect public opinion
StarfishSaver
Sep 2019
#27
You're probably thinking of the Senate hearings held in the summer of 1973
StarfishSaver
Sep 2019
#31
As I've said repeatedly, the first 20 minutes of the first impeachment hearing was televised.
StarfishSaver
Sep 2019
#70
Their job is to impeach when there is a majority that votes for it, as per the constitution.
ehrnst
Sep 2019
#35
History does not support you in the claim that Republicans were willing to remove.
Cuthbert Allgood
Sep 2019
#41
Actually history does support my claim that there were republicans willing to impeach
ehrnst
Sep 2019
#47
Well, that's not something that a lot of the public, even here on DU understands.
ehrnst
Sep 2019
#44
There is enough to vote on a resolution outlining rules for inquiry, and that's scheduled for this
ehrnst
Sep 2019
#42
Just as we would not want to see a Dem impeached on a straight, or near straight, Party line
empedocles
Sep 2019
#73