Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

NRaleighLiberal

(60,015 posts)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 11:41 PM Jul 2018

Scary stuff from Slate "The Real Threat to American Democracy Isn't Russia. It's the Right." [View all]

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/07/the-real-threat-to-american-democracy-is-the-right.html

A week ago, Norman Ornstein, a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, brought some attention to a growing threat to the integrity of our elections. “By 2040 or so,” he tweeted, “70 percent of Americans will live in 15 states. Meaning 30 percent will choose 70 senators. And the 30% will be older, whiter, more rural, more male than the 70 percent.” Two days later, the Washington Post’s Philip Bump ran a check on the numbers, citing an analysis of Census Bureau projections from the University of Virginia’s Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service. “In broad strokes,” he wrote, “Ornstein is correct.”

[In 2040] eight states will have just under half of the total population of the country, 49.5 percent, according to the Weldon Cooper Center’s estimate. The next eight most populous states will account for an additional fifth of the population, up to 69.2 percent — meaning that the 16 most populous states will be home to about 70 percent of Americans.

[…]Ornstein’s … point is clear: 30 percent of the population of the country will control 68 percent of the seats in the U.S. Senate. Or, more starkly, half the population of the country will control 84 percent of those seats. His tweet goes further, suggesting that the demographics of those states will differ from the larger states, as well, and, therefore, so will their politics.

In short, beyond holding an advantage in the House even before the recent wave of Republican gerrymandering, the most conservative regions of the country—places more white, more male, and more rural than the country at large—have and will continue to hold a lock on the United States Senate that will grow ever more absurd as the the country’s actual population centers grow, a situation that grants them a veto over legislation that the majority of Americans might want, and the power to shape or shrink government programs and initiatives disproportionately needed by women and minorities living in less conservative states.


snip - sobering read. Check the rest at the link above
32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
K&R highplainsdem Jul 2018 #1
Both are the same. rockfordfile Jul 2018 #2
Exactly. The right has aligned with Russia. BadgerMom Jul 2018 #14
And the religious groups TrishaJ Jul 2018 #25
The RW flying monkeys love Russia because it is fascist, majority white and fake Christian. roamer65 Jul 2018 #32
Vast concentrations of people into metropolitian areas... krispos42 Jul 2018 #3
K&R Puzzler Jul 2018 #4
we gotta get rid of Fox News Hamlette Jul 2018 #5
That occurred to me earlier tonight, until Fox News is dealt with, nada... appalachiablue Jul 2018 #9
Unfortunately Fox "news" has metastasized workinclasszero Jul 2018 #23
Yup we needs laes that ban fake new like fox. Joe941 Jul 2018 #31
that'a why we need 50 states strategy AlexSFCA Jul 2018 #6
+1 Yes. appalachiablue Jul 2018 #8
A large chunk of the population is vehemently opposed to principles that... Garrett78 Jul 2018 #12
at the very least we must capture swing states AlexSFCA Jul 2018 #15
Sure, it's all about who can win key battleground states. Garrett78 Jul 2018 #21
It is important to remember LiberalLovinLug Jul 2018 #7
Important points and distinction. appalachiablue Jul 2018 #10
"65% of Americans believe in establishing the popular vote as the method for electing presidents" Garrett78 Jul 2018 #11
Hillary would've won if we went by the popular vote True_Blue Jul 2018 #13
Yes, but my point, of course, was about the difficulty of getting rid of the electoral college. Garrett78 Jul 2018 #17
Please Check out the Popular Vote Movement JustAnotherGen Jul 2018 #26
I guess we have to find a way marlakay Jul 2018 #16
Right! roscoeroscoe Jul 2018 #27
I think I could do Idaho or Montana marlakay Jul 2018 #28
we could expand the number of House Reps (and thus the number of EC voters) and distribute Celerity Jul 2018 #18
K&R mountain grammy Jul 2018 #19
K&R Scurrilous Jul 2018 #20
It's been this way for a long time. octoberlib Jul 2018 #22
What's the argument for each state having the same number of US Senators? Garrett78 Jul 2018 #24
K&R Solly Mack Jul 2018 #29
Sadly That's True colsohlibgal Jul 2018 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Scary stuff from Slate "T...