Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
7. Nothing your negative (Trump/ Mitt support) argument
Mon May 28, 2018, 11:25 PM
May 2018

has any validity to negate the fact that the Clerk of Court - illegally - refused to docket the case.

You are such a Laser hater, that you play games to keep people from legitimate discussion, telling only false narratives in support of bogus rulings, for the sake of defending bad faith acts.

This Judge signed an Order to dismiss on May 5th when the docket record wasn't created until May 24th.

You act if that isn't a horrific state of affairs.

If my case was so week, then why block it from being filed?

The judge insanely signed an Order to dismiss when there was no case number. Meaning the 10 days to appeal timely, was moot.

And you act as if that is okay.

Puhhhllleeeaaassseee.....

How can you constantly support abuses of discretion as if such is dispositive?

You act as if judges are perfect - even when they engage in Color of Law.

You can go get a dozen of your gang to bark all the B.S. you wish; but that doesn't change the fact that Romney & Sachs perpetrated frauds that my attorneys betrayed me - by aiding , abetting and lying under oath.

Sooner or later, Justice will come - to your shame!

Shheesshh

If you want to play lawyer so badly, why don't you go to law school? stevenleser May 2018 #1
That is because you don't know Jack crap about the law laserhaas May 2018 #3
According to whom? You? You have been declared a vexatious litigant in stevenleser May 2018 #4
And per jberryhills link below the judge told you pretty much what i did stevenleser May 2018 #6
Who cares what the clerk told you? jberryhill May 2018 #2
Nothing your negative (Trump/ Mitt support) argument laserhaas May 2018 #7
You haven't been to law school yet you opine on the merits of a judges opinion? stevenleser May 2018 #12
That order is dated May 5 jberryhill May 2018 #13
Btw did he accuse you of being "a Laser hater" stevenleser May 2018 #14
Dude, get a different hobby. The Velveteen Ocelot May 2018 #5
You have me mixed up with corrupt Federal agents and Wall Street crooks laserhaas May 2018 #8
Hey, they're your windmills. Tilt away. The Velveteen Ocelot May 2018 #9
Legal eagles tend to circle the wagon to protect lawyers laserhaas May 2018 #10
Graham has a pyramid of argument validity. laserhaas May 2018 #11
The problem with this is, you don't know the subject matter and won't listen to the one person stevenleser May 2018 #16
The naysayers are basically ignoring 100 crimes transpired laserhaas May 2018 #25
A recent case in point is Sup CT decision employees lack rights laserhaas May 2018 #26
How is the F-Deck hiding a case? n/t tammywammy May 2018 #15
I've filed tons of briefs, motions and such - over 17 years laserhaas May 2018 #17
So you don't know what F-Deck means. tammywammy May 2018 #19
I emailed the Clerk laserhaas May 2018 #20
It appears to be the DC district court's designation for "pro se general civil" litigation jberryhill May 2018 #21
Thanks. tammywammy May 2018 #22
"Crazy s--t filed by pro se litigants" Seems about right. nt stevenleser May 2018 #23
The Clerk didn't answer laserhaas May 2018 #24
Clerks are ministers of the courts - they have no rights to tamper laserhaas May 2018 #18
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why is Trump Obstructing ...»Reply #7