Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Jonathan Turley chimes in on Obama & the NDAA. Another Constitutional scholar is appalled. [View all]lillypaddle
(9,581 posts)31. What is your problem
with people not eating up Greenwald's shit? Funny that Obama supporters are called all kinds of names, but god forbid anyone say anything against Glenn or Cenk ... what a bunch of hypocrisy! Some people can dish it out, but get their panties in a wad when the tables are reversed.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
101 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Jonathan Turley chimes in on Obama & the NDAA. Another Constitutional scholar is appalled. [View all]
tpsbmam
Jan 2012
OP
especially since only "you know who" is speaking out against this in their campaign
think
Jan 2012
#2
In other words, some anonymous people on the internet will disagree with him.
Dewey Finn
Jan 2012
#3
The "constitutional scholar" seems to rely on hyperbole, rather than the constitution, for arguments
bhikkhu
Jan 2012
#5
Said "constitutional scholar" just lost a case against Obama, and got spanked by the judge.
msanthrope
Jan 2012
#42
And the fact that the 2001 military authorization is appalling is beside the point?
eridani
Jan 2012
#54
As do you, going so far to ignore some of those who wrote the damn thing.
TheKentuckian
Jan 2012
#10
Incomplete--Turley just lost a case to Obama. Turley now criticizes Obama. nt
msanthrope
Jan 2012
#43
This is a terrible provision of the NDAA, but where's the outrage at Congress?
boxman15
Jan 2012
#13
Congress is useless and ineffective on both sides. Obama could have vetoed.
piratefish08
Jan 2012
#16
It's not that bizarre. It would take congress another month or two to pass it.
killbotfactory
Jan 2012
#37
Two months of no funding for the VA. I can imagine how kindly the "liberal media" would treat that.
Robb
Jan 2012
#45
Nah, better to do childish shit just to prove a point rather than do something constructive
uponit7771
Jan 2012
#99
And yet, most people stay away from voting in a non-presidential election year.
killbotfactory
Jan 2012
#26
Can Turley wait his turn please? This board is not yet done with the Greenwald hate festival.
JackRiddler
Jan 2012
#19
I take it Turley's still sore over the public spanking he got in Kucinich v. Obama?
msanthrope
Jan 2012
#40
Turley's is a reasonable if somewhat mild response to a fascist law. K&R (nt)
T S Justly
Jan 2012
#71
Oh, c'mon. We can trust the miliatary and government to do the right thing.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jan 2012
#72
feh. turley likes to get his name in print. the compromise language makes clear that the ndaa cannot
struggle4progress
Jan 2012
#93