Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: DU atty please explain what it means that Cohen gets to review first or not [View all]DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)25. That lawyer was sanctioned twice
http://www.calbarjournal.com/April2011/AttorneyDiscipline/SuspensionsProbation#33
He screwed a client for $750.00, SMH
He screwed a client for $750.00, SMH
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
35 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
DU atty please explain what it means that Cohen gets to review first or not [View all]
Eliot Rosewater
Apr 2018
OP
I dont care who sees them first, I do care if some arbiter decides something isnt
Eliot Rosewater
Apr 2018
#3
If The Feds did a no knock search on John Gotti would he get to see the seized evidence
DemocratSinceBirth
Apr 2018
#12
If she allows the defendant to see the seized evidence before the government
DemocratSinceBirth
Apr 2018
#16
If I understand it correctly he got a 40% contingency in the Broidy case.
DemocratSinceBirth
Apr 2018
#28
" And no one, not even the president, can exploit the attorney-client privilege to engage in..."
DemocratSinceBirth
Apr 2018
#30
So the "scope" of the action here could eliminate documents not direclty related to Stormy?
Eliot Rosewater
Apr 2018
#6
No if the Document is Relevant to Crime/Fraud Exception then Justice Will Be able to Meet its Burden
Stallion
Apr 2018
#9
So if there was a document that he paid another person to be quiet about something, which is not a
Eliot Rosewater
Apr 2018
#10
Yep Sooner or Later, regardless of the method used to classify the documents, Judge is going to...
Stallion
Apr 2018
#13
And so a document that might outright prove Rump is guilty of any number of crimes including
Eliot Rosewater
Apr 2018
#7
...with a reputable attorney...a reputable attorney...a...a reputable attorney?
Leghorn21
Apr 2018
#19
So they get to see what they already knew was there, it was seized from him.
Eliot Rosewater
Apr 2018
#20
i've seen two articles that have a different take on this....so I'm not sure what's going on.
spanone
Apr 2018
#24
Regardless Cohen is gonna get to see what he already knows exists cuz it was in his office
Eliot Rosewater
Apr 2018
#27
You're on the Right Tract--but Attorney-Client Privilege and Relevancy/Materiality are Separate ...
Stallion
Apr 2018
#33
I expect Cohen can claim communications with any clients, unrelated to this prosecution,
struggle4progress
Apr 2018
#35
It is discovery...my take is that Cohen ET AL will get the documents but not for ten days
Demsrule86
Apr 2018
#34