Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
22. The purpose was quite plainly to draw a false equivalency, as others have pointed out.
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 04:51 PM
Jul 2012

There is no basis nor source for the article's premise other than to conflate the two and set up the "everybody does it" meme that is the authoritarian's best hope for the status quo. Zinn never made any claim to objectivity, he has stated this on many occasions. He says that he wrote it as some small counter to the highly sanitized and completely one-sided picture presented to us as fact for generations.

Let's be frank, everybody with a pulse knows the shit has begun to hit the fan and we're in for some real drama. The collapse of '08 was only the first big chunk to hit and the splatters continue and will grow in number over the next couple of years. If the groundwork is not laid now, there is a real chance that the inevitable changes will not go the way the winners want it to.

As we move closer to that edge of the unknown, the panic will continue to mount.

This won't go well, but it is hard to read Zinn with cthulu2016 Jul 2012 #1
I completely agree salvorhardin Jul 2012 #2
The Article, Though, Sir, Is Still an exercise In False Equivalency The Magistrate Jul 2012 #3
agreed cthulu2016 Jul 2012 #5
Just finished reading the article, and was about to post this same point. Egalitarian Thug Jul 2012 #7
true and arely staircase Jul 2012 #20
my thoughts exactly Douglas Carpenter Jul 2012 #39
It's more polemic than history honestly Spider Jerusalem Jul 2012 #6
What a ridiculous article! Nostradammit Jul 2012 #4
The article is all blovation cthulu2016 Jul 2012 #8
Zinn's sin is writing from the wrong perspective. n/t Egalitarian Thug Jul 2012 #9
Writing from a single perspective is "polemic" bhikkhu Jul 2012 #16
That wasn't the purpose of the article salvorhardin Jul 2012 #10
Citing 'Reason', sir? The Magistrate Jul 2012 #18
reason magazine is great arely staircase Jul 2012 #21
The purpose was quite plainly to draw a false equivalency, as others have pointed out. Egalitarian Thug Jul 2012 #22
HNN's gotten pretty vile in the last year Posteritatis Jul 2012 #11
All of a sudden? salvorhardin Jul 2012 #12
There's always been a bit of a slant, but I did see a sudden, very sharp swerve. Posteritatis Jul 2012 #17
Gosh, historians have their points of view? Tierra_y_Libertad Jul 2012 #13
There's historiography and then there's lying salvorhardin Jul 2012 #14
One of my history profs said to History majors that studying history is a sure way to cynicism. Tierra_y_Libertad Jul 2012 #15
As the Man Said, Sir The Magistrate Jul 2012 #19
I would say that his description of King Phillip's war, to cite one example hfojvt Jul 2012 #24
Anyone who bases all their knowledge on one book is a lost cause Scootaloo Jul 2012 #27
but in this incident, it is not the right direction hfojvt Jul 2012 #33
I've got a quote here from a book you may be familair with... Scootaloo Jul 2012 #35
oh no, not the alarms hfojvt Jul 2012 #38
Actually, Zinn's talking about the war Scootaloo Jul 2012 #40
Exactly. nt raouldukelives Jul 2012 #34
I wrote this about Zinn's first chapter hfojvt Jul 2012 #23
Thanks for that salvorhardin Jul 2012 #25
Interesting that the article plays off the name of James Loewen's book Scootaloo Jul 2012 #26
I finally sat down to read Zinn about 10 years ago, threw it away after 3 chapters 1-Old-Man Jul 2012 #28
Consider the source of this squirt at Zinn. George Mason U is a nutter butter factory leveymg Jul 2012 #29
This thread leads credence melm00se Jul 2012 #30
Sadly true salvorhardin Jul 2012 #32
This is babble. bemildred Jul 2012 #31
It's safe to dismiss people who claim to be "objective" as liars Scootaloo Jul 2012 #36
Dumb liars. bemildred Jul 2012 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Lies the Debunkers Told M...»Reply #22