General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: TAX THE AMMO!!! [View all]quaker bill
(8,222 posts)Not because I have a problem with hunting, or shooting sports. I have done both in my past.
I would not possess a firearm because I refuse to be part of a subculture that holds this to be a civil right. It may be the law as recently re-interpreted by a republican supreme court. I unconcerned about what they deem to be legal. A great many things are entirely legal, but have stupid written all over them.
It is apparently your constitutional right, as interpreted by this court, to build your house on the beach where the next hurricane will assuredly rip it apart and send it ashore as wind borne shrapnel to damage and injure others, and it is "unconstitutional" for government to interfere with you doing so in any way.
I will not partake of a "right" that costs this many innocent lives. It is a personal opinion and a personal choice, and I clearly have the constitutional right to it, every bit as much as you have the RKBA. When the day comes that the court finally re-interprets the 2nd amendment, I will not be among the protestors.