General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Ding ding... agree and I've thought this for awhile [View all]
mathGuyNTulsa Dec 30 · 04:49:08 PM
Here are more dots to connect. Papadopoulos guilty plea states that he first learned about Russias willingness to help rig the election on March 14th of 2016. Two days later, key Senate Republican John Cornyn announced that he intended to block the Merrick Garland nomination.
At the time, blocking the nomination was at best a peculiar move. Everyone expected HRC would win the election and nominate someone even more liberal than Garland for SCOTUS. Polling at the time also gave the Democrats a good chance of winning control of the Senate. Blocking Garland was a risky strategy with a low probability of actual payoff.
However, blocking the Garland nomination makes perfect sense if the Senate leadership knew, in March of 2016, that the Russians were going to rig the election. The path to that knowledge is easy to deduce: Papdopoulos to Helmsalready on the inside of the Trump campaign--to McConnell.
Proving all of this is another matter, but the circumstantial evidence is mounting that the 2016 election and all of its consequences was invalid.
comment from:
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/12/30/1728716/-Did-Trump-now-about-Australia-s-spy-agency-notifying-the-FBI-from-the-start#comment_68821001
also remember THIS:
https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/paul-ryan-keeps-it-family-kevin-mccarthy-russia-trump