Can't wait for the day the orange menace will be subpoenaed to appear in front of that GJ...

Americans in 37 states say abortion should be legal in most or all cases


https://twitter.com/CarlBialik/status/1438552344787132418


Minority rule. 🤬

https://twitter.com/CarlBialik/status/1438552344787132418



Minority rule. 🤬

Source: NPR & NBC News

June 16, 20225:25 PM ET

The Justice Department has asked the lead investigator for the House Jan. 6 select committee for speedy access to transcripts of witness interviews, arguing the lack of information-sharing is complicating its ongoing criminal probe.

Top DOJ officials have renewed a request they first made in April — before the panel launched blockbuster public hearings in which they quoted from prosecutors' court filings and played video featuring defendants in an ongoing seditious conspiracy case the department brought against the far-right Proud Boys group.

The committee will turn over transcripts in "due time," but not by the end of the week, Chair Bennie Thompson told reporters after Thursday's hearing.

"We will work with them, but we have a report to do," he said. "We are not going to stop what we are doing to share information that we've gotten so far with the Department of Justice."

Read more: https://www.npr.org/2022/06/16/1105663992/the-justice-department-wants-to-see-the-jan-6-committees-transcripts

---

Link to similar report on NBC News:https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/justice-department-says-jan-6-committee-interview-transcripts-critical-rcna33995

The Future Criminal Case Against Donald Trump

by Neal K. Katyal
Mr. Katyal is a professor at Georgetown University Law Center, was an acting solicitor general in the Obama administration and is a co-author of “Impeach: The Case Against Donald Trump.”

Congress and the Justice Department now find themselves in a complex dance, set to the tempo of the Jan. 6 hearings. The House select committee has already uncovered evidence suggesting that former President Donald Trump committed serious federal crimes.

Congress cannot bring criminal charges; the Justice Department must do so. And critics of the department are asking why it does not appear to be investigating these allegations. The hearings point to a potential answer: The committee is laying a foundation upon which prosecutors can build in a subsequent investigation.

And a subsequent investigation is virtually inevitable, given the evidence generated by the committee. How could Attorney General Merrick Garland ignore the facts the American people are now learning about?

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/14/opinion/future-criminal-case-against-trump.html?referringSource=articleShare

GOTV

If that article is true:

DOJ lawyers expect transcripts from the 1,000 January 6 committee witnesses to be made public in September

Business Insider link: https://www.businessinsider.com/january-6-committee-transcripts-witnesses-doj-investigation-2022-6

So that would be around the time the committee could have finalized its report.

It would also mean the Dems could use them to make damning ads during their campaigns...

As for the DOJ indicting GQP criminals who won't be running for the midterms, it's a big guess, but voters will see the transcripts, watch talk shows explaining what's in them, and urge them to vote for more Democratic candidates.

Is pence guilty of concealing dump and his co-conspirators's criminal plot to "overturn the Election" (dump's own quote from a 'statement' he issued after pence's speech at cpaq)?