Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
DemocratsForProgress
DemocratsForProgress's Journal
DemocratsForProgress's Journal
January 28, 2015
More at: http://www.democratsforprogress.com/2015/01/28/medias-direct-reporting-omits-deep-background/
Media’s Direct Reporting Omits Deep Background
Walter Rhett: Medias Direct Reporting Omits Deep BackgroundGrowing frustration exists about the role of global media in sharing the truth and facts about politics. Even the medias cherished idea of balance has taken a slant. The American medias direct reporting omits deep backgrounds. In print and broadcast, anonymous sources are assigned the duty of representing an ideology and attacking those who disagree. In live reports, face time is more important than oral intelligence. And no news broadcast is complete without a YouTube clip.
What recent stories has the media missed and how have the omissions affected the country?
The biggest missing story is about the media itself: it has abandoned analysis. Instead of being shaped by insights and history, or by conflict and values, stories are blocked. They are packaged for immediacy rather than viable information, and immediacy has come to mean any story which zooms in on a crisis in the social order, a threat to well-being or life.
Blocking a story means it will be limited to reviewing events without examining causes; limited by sensationalism that ignores the mainstream; limited by the next big story without any follow-up on the previous big story. But the storys limits always include speculation, no-rules chatter about what happens next. Speculation, and its inaccurate prophecies, unleashed fears and violations of logic and common sense, is featured without critical review. By offering speculation, media abandons the idea of wrong or right; its stories are blocked to show who is for and who is against...
More at: http://www.democratsforprogress.com/2015/01/28/medias-direct-reporting-omits-deep-background/
January 26, 2015
More at: http://www.democratsforprogress.com/2015/01/26/stormy-monday-12615/
Stormy Monday, 1/26/15
Jeff Rosenzweig: Stormy Monday, 1/26/15The President wants to extend wilderness designation and concomitant environmental protections to millions more acres of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, a move opposed by Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski and other Republicans, who would prefer to drill the crap out of ANWR. Showcasing her famed policy chops and keen intellect, Murkowski commented, I cannot understand why this administration is willing to negotiate with Iran, but not Alaska.
Speaking of negotiations with Iran, Republicans are hell-bent on screwing those up too. Tuesday, the House Foreign Affairs Committee will conduct what it risibly describes as a hearing on the status of the negotiations. As Congress lurches toward additional sanctions, Irans Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif warned the other day that such a move would kill the joint plan of action that we adopted last year in Geneva. In another odd development, Zarif has been summoned to explain to his nations parliament why he went for a 15-minute walk with John Kerry in Geneva on January 14. Uh-oh
Winter Storm Juno is bearing down on the Northeast, with blizzard conditions expected to affect up to 28 million people. Junos worst impact will last from Monday evening into Tuesday, with snowfall rates of two to four inches an hour and total accumulations of two feet or more forecast for some areas of New England. The suspiciously enthusiastic Henry Margusity, an Accuweather meteorologist, took to Twitter to announce, It will be like a tidal wave of snow into New England tonight into Tuesday.
Tuesday, the President will pass up a planned trip to the Taj Mahal and cut short his stay in India to head for Saudi Arabia for a meeting with its new king, Salman bin Abdul-Aziz Al Saud, our latest staunch ally and wonderful, not at all duplicitous partner in the Middle East. Salman succeeds his recently deceased brother Adbullah, our previous staunch ally and wonderful, not at all duplicitous partner in the Middle East...
More at: http://www.democratsforprogress.com/2015/01/26/stormy-monday-12615/
January 24, 2015
More at: http://www.democratsforprogress.com/2015/01/24/soak-the-rich/
Soak the Rich?
Grumpy and Ms. Mouse: Soak the Rich?Mouse: What is that all about? How is simply asking the extremely wealthy to pay their fair share of taxes soaking them? How is asking those who have benefited the most from the past 30 years of economic policy to pay up soaking them?
Doesnt the middle class deserve a break? A chance to share in the wealth of the country they help make great? And what about the poor? Dont they deserve a break and a chance too?
How ridiculous did the Republicans look sitting there like statues during President Obamas SOTU speech? They refused to applaud anything that would help the average American. Im sure that was on orders from the Koch brothers.
Grumpy: Oh, dont get me started on the Koch brothers. Well be here for a month before I finish my rant. You are absolutely right about tax fairness. The conservative side likes to point out that the wealthy pay the majority of the taxes, but they never talk about whether those at the top are paying proportionally the same as the average middle-income workers pay. In some cases under todays tax system, many of the wealthiest (Im looking at you, Mitt) pay less than the doorman at their fancy Park Avenue digs or the mechanics that install their car elevators...
More at: http://www.democratsforprogress.com/2015/01/24/soak-the-rich/
January 20, 2015
More at: http://www.democratsforprogress.com/2015/01/20/prate-of-the-union/
Prate of the Union
Jeff Rosenzweig: Prate of the UnionA typical State of the Union Address tells us less about a presidency than the other partys official response to it does. This has been especially true during the Obama years. More crucially, though, its an opportunity for the opposition party to try to tell viewers about itself, to trot out one of its best and brightest young up-and-comers to dazzle the camera with a mouthful of startlingly white teeth, to pluck the heartstrings of Ma and Pa Viewer, and to remind us all of that mythical time when the backbone of the economy was 5-cent lemonade stands and the nations greatness was embodied by Juicy Fruit and the Marshall Plan. And to try and make the case, with occasional faint praise, that the President is an America-hating disaster.
Bobby Jindal was the first such nine-day wonder thrown into the breach, although he was actually responding to a non-SOTU address before a joint session of Congress, delivered barely a month into Barack Obamas first term. In and of itself, the choice of Jindal to deliver the response seemed to reflect the flimsy state of GOP political strategizing at the time: Youthful mixed-race President? No problem! We got a young Indian feller right here, and bonus! he talks like Forrest Gump. Multi-cultural or what?
Jindals uncannily awful performance was so widely panned even by Republicans that, six years on, he has yet to regain rising star status in a party still desperately searching for one. Which goes some way toward explaining the GOPs choice to respond to the first official Obama SOTU the following year, Smilin Bob McDonnell. Governor McDonnell was just 11 days into his term and was a Republican matinee idol, reassuringly white, Southern but not too Southern, telegenic in a megachurch preacher kind of way, and articulate without being wonkish. Back in 2010, some in his party envisioned the Oval Office in his future; he was most recently in the headlines a couple of weeks ago after receiving an outrageously lenient prison sentence on 11 counts of corruption.
Things got a little more interesting in 2011, when not one but three Republicans were tapped to try and rebut the SOTU. There was Paul Ryan, an intellectual bantamweight with a fondness for moth-eaten Randian ideas (in other words, the sort of Republican other Republicans actually consider a serious policy guy). There was Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, an archconservative Florida Congresswoman and cable news darling, summoned to speak to Hispanics after it finally occurred to the RNC that Hispanics dont much care for Republicans. And then there was Michele Bachmann. Her official response on behalf of the Tea Party Express is the only one anybody remembers, less for its predictable teabagger platitudes than for the fact that she appeared to spend six minutes and 36 seconds speaking to someone standing unseen a couple of feet to the left of the camera...
More at: http://www.democratsforprogress.com/2015/01/20/prate-of-the-union/
January 12, 2015
More at: http://www.democratsforprogress.com/2015/01/12/stormy-monday-11215/
Stormy Monday, 1/12/15
Jeff Rosenzweig: Stormy Monday, 1/12/15New Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell man, it makes me queasy to type that will try to move authorization of the Keystone XL pipeline forward today after last weeks House vote to approve it.
Tuesday, Chris Christie takes a time-out from mourning his beloved Dallas Cowboys to deliver his State of the State address. Spoiler alert: the state of the state is rife with corruption, with the worst of it centered around 354 Stockton Street in Princeton. Governor Christie will likely avoid that topic, though, to concentrate on lying and blustering, the two things he does best.
Senate Democrats will be in Baltimore Wednesday and Thursday for their annual policy retreat (and no, I will not go for a cheap laugh here). Theyll be doing so without Minority Leader Harry Reid, whos still recovering from his recent injuries and remains in Washington on doctors orders. House and Senate Republicans, meanwhile, will gather in Hershey, Pennsylvania for a joint two-day retreat, presumably to synch up their respective ideas for destroying the country as efficiently as possible.
Wednesday at noon, the Londonderry Fish and Game Club in Litchfield, New Hampshire hosts a one-hour conversation on the Second Amendment with crackpot Senator Rand Paul, followed by a Q&A session where its pretty much guaranteed Senator Paul will not be asked pertinent questions like Why the hell do you think youre qualified to be President? and Whered you get that hair?
More at: http://www.democratsforprogress.com/2015/01/12/stormy-monday-11215/
January 1, 2015
More at: http://www.democratsforprogress.com/2014/12/31/race-and-the-new-year/
Race and the New Year
Walter Rhett: Race and the New YearLet us not forget: the year will end with the Republican Speaker of the House giving his full support to a closet racist in the House leadership, who will hold the number three position, as Majority Whip. The Speaker issued a preemptive statement, intended to tamp down the growing furor over a speech the yet-to-be sworn Whip made ten years ago to a white supremacist organizations convention, the group founded by his buddy and fellow politician, the former KKK Grand Wizard from Louisiana, David Duke.
Now, one speech doesnt make you a racist. But one lie will. The new Whip has exceeded his quota. His lying about his ties to Duke and his speech make him a repeat offender. His lies include pretending not to know what the organization stood for. Does any politician at any level accept an invitation to speak without reviewing the goals, mission and agenda of the group before which he will appear? But more, Duke says the man soon to be the third highest ranking member of the House leadership knew exactly what the group stood for and knew of his own ties to its founding. So who is lying? The former Grand Wizard or the soon-to-be sworn Majority Whip?
Having renounced ten years late the goals and mission of the organization he voluntarily appeared before, the incoming Whip claimed higher ground, as a father, Catholic and leader. Then he supports voting rights, equal pay, Obamacare and raising the minimum wage? Well, nobut as a good Louisiana politician from a small, solid red district, not for racial reasons, but to preserve cost benefits for businesses, public fiscal integrity and personal liberty.
Its hard to see the defense of liberty as offensive, or to abhor fiscal integrity and concern for small business. Surely, these positive goals are common to the American Promise and have little to do with race or racism, the ugliness of denying equal opportunity, restricting persons by color and ethnicity, and using the law for the economic advantage of a specific group...
More at: http://www.democratsforprogress.com/2014/12/31/race-and-the-new-year/
Profile Information
Member since: Mon May 28, 2012, 12:11 AMNumber of posts: 545