Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
kpete
kpete's Journal
kpete's Journal
March 19, 2016
https://twitter.com/_Snape_/status/710165667740311552
It finally makes sense......
:largehttps://twitter.com/_Snape_/status/710165667740311552
March 19, 2016
Lesson # 1 - from Al Gore
March 19, 2016
All we need to know about Today's GOP
March 19, 2016
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/03/gop-must-answer-for-what-it-did-to-kansas.html
https://twitter.com/jonathanchait
In Bizarro World - The Teaparty Never Happened
Imagine if democratic socialists did to VT what the Tea Party has done to KShttp://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/03/gop-must-answer-for-what-it-did-to-kansas.html
https://twitter.com/jonathanchait
March 19, 2016
Donald Trump modeling his new White Supremacist tie collection made by Chinese political prisoners
March 19, 2016
"A Sucker Born Every Minute"
March 19, 2016
http://mediamatters.org/video/2016/03/16/cnns-jake-tapper-challenges-gop-senator-you-mus/209324
CNN's Jake Tapper Challenges GOP Senator: "You Must Be Thrilled Obama Followed Your Suggestion"
CNN's Jake Tapper Challenges GOP Senator: "You Must Be Thrilled Obama Followed Your Suggestion" For SCOTUS Nomination
Tapper: "In 2010 ... You Said There Was No Question He Would Win Confirmation With Bipartisan Support"
JAKE TAPPER (HOST): Senator, I want to read you back something you told Newsmax on Friday, quote: "Obama could easily name Merrick Garland, who is a fine man. He probably won't do that because this appointment is about the election. So I'm pretty sure he'll name someone the liberal Democratic base wants." So theoretically you must be thrilled President Obama followed your suggestion.
SEN. ORRIN HATCH (R-UT) Well, you know, it isn't a question of who he's appointed, it's a question of whether you should bring that up during this caustic, toxic presidential election process. It's something that really hasn't been done before, except in the case of in recent years, in the last 75 years, except in the case of Justice Kennedy, who after a long ordeal of Democrats smearing Bork and then going right down the line, everybody was happy to get that over with.
[...]
TAPPER: Senator, in 2010 you actually specifically addressed the possibility that President Obama would nominate Judge Garland. You said there was no question he would win confirmation with bipartisan support.
HATCH: Well, and he did. As a matter of fact, I led that fight for him. You know, he's a fine man. I have no problem with liking, you know, the judge. I mean he's a good judge. Now, I haven't looked at his opinions for 19 years, and we're not talking about a Circuit Court of Appeals judgeship. We're talking about the highest court in the land, the court of final decision making where you -- it's the court of final appeal in this country. So it's a much more serious thing, and I can quote you Democrat after Democrat who when Republicans were in control said you can't do this.
TAPPER: Right.
HATCH: You know, so now that the ox is gored, I mean they of course would like to just be able to run right over you, and the Republicans aren't going to let them do that.
SEN. ORRIN HATCH (R-UT) Well, you know, it isn't a question of who he's appointed, it's a question of whether you should bring that up during this caustic, toxic presidential election process. It's something that really hasn't been done before, except in the case of in recent years, in the last 75 years, except in the case of Justice Kennedy, who after a long ordeal of Democrats smearing Bork and then going right down the line, everybody was happy to get that over with.
[...]
TAPPER: Senator, in 2010 you actually specifically addressed the possibility that President Obama would nominate Judge Garland. You said there was no question he would win confirmation with bipartisan support.
HATCH: Well, and he did. As a matter of fact, I led that fight for him. You know, he's a fine man. I have no problem with liking, you know, the judge. I mean he's a good judge. Now, I haven't looked at his opinions for 19 years, and we're not talking about a Circuit Court of Appeals judgeship. We're talking about the highest court in the land, the court of final decision making where you -- it's the court of final appeal in this country. So it's a much more serious thing, and I can quote you Democrat after Democrat who when Republicans were in control said you can't do this.
TAPPER: Right.
HATCH: You know, so now that the ox is gored, I mean they of course would like to just be able to run right over you, and the Republicans aren't going to let them do that.
http://mediamatters.org/video/2016/03/16/cnns-jake-tapper-challenges-gop-senator-you-mus/209324
March 19, 2016
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ol-donald-trump-brokered-convention-riots-20160317-story.html
LAT Editorial Note to Donald Trump: A brokered convention is no reason to riot
:largehttp://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-ol-donald-trump-brokered-convention-riots-20160317-story.html
March 19, 2016
............
Republicans who vow to deny Garland a hearing and who pledge to support Donald Trump if he is their partys nominee are saying: Democracy somehow requires that this vacancy on a non-majoritarian institution must be filled only after voters have had their say through the election of the next president. And constitutional values will be served if the vacancy is filled not by Garland but by someone chosen by President Trump, a stupendously uninformed dilettante who thinks judges sign what he refers to as bills. There is every reason to think that Trump understands none of the issues pertinent to the Supreme Courts role in the American regime, and there is no reason to doubt that he would bring to the selection of justices what he brings to all matters arrogance leavened by frivolousness.
Trumps multiplying Republican apologists do not deny the self-evident that he is as clueless regarding everything as he is about the nuclear triad. These invertebrate Republicans assume that as president he would surround himself with people unlike himself wise and temperate advisers. So, we should wager everything on the hope that the man who says his number one foreign policy adviser is myself (because I have a very good brain) will succumb to humility and rely on people who actually know things. If Republicans really think that either their front-runner or the Democrats would nominate someone superior to Garland, it would be amusing to hear them try to explain why they do.
.........
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-gop-wont-give-the-nominee-a-hearing-explained/2016/03/18/25df8ab2-ec8a-11e5-a6f3-21ccdbc5f74e_story.html
Quite remarkable column by George Will (i know, i know)
Do Republicans really think Donald Trump will make a good Supreme Court choice?............
Republicans who vow to deny Garland a hearing and who pledge to support Donald Trump if he is their partys nominee are saying: Democracy somehow requires that this vacancy on a non-majoritarian institution must be filled only after voters have had their say through the election of the next president. And constitutional values will be served if the vacancy is filled not by Garland but by someone chosen by President Trump, a stupendously uninformed dilettante who thinks judges sign what he refers to as bills. There is every reason to think that Trump understands none of the issues pertinent to the Supreme Courts role in the American regime, and there is no reason to doubt that he would bring to the selection of justices what he brings to all matters arrogance leavened by frivolousness.
Trumps multiplying Republican apologists do not deny the self-evident that he is as clueless regarding everything as he is about the nuclear triad. These invertebrate Republicans assume that as president he would surround himself with people unlike himself wise and temperate advisers. So, we should wager everything on the hope that the man who says his number one foreign policy adviser is myself (because I have a very good brain) will succumb to humility and rely on people who actually know things. If Republicans really think that either their front-runner or the Democrats would nominate someone superior to Garland, it would be amusing to hear them try to explain why they do.
.........
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-gop-wont-give-the-nominee-a-hearing-explained/2016/03/18/25df8ab2-ec8a-11e5-a6f3-21ccdbc5f74e_story.html
Profile Information
Member since: Fri Sep 17, 2004, 03:59 PMNumber of posts: 71,986