babylonsister
babylonsister's Journal"Illegal Alien" No More: The Biden Administration Drops the Label
This is a couple of days old, but I missed it.
February 25, 2021
Illegal Alien No More: The Biden Administration Drops the Label
Tell us which language and policy changes should come next.
Daniel King
In a major milestone for immigrants rights activists seeking shifts in language and law, the Biden administration has dropped illegal alien from government communications, taking federal agencies out of the business of branding peopleinstead of actionsillegal. The move marks the culmination of the yearslong Drop the I-Word campaign, spearheaded by author and Mother Jones board member Rinku Sen. Her movement is widely credited with creating much of the groundwork for retiring the phrase.
The shift was made in an internal Homeland Security Department memo directing officials to replace alien with noncitizen, and illegal with undocumented.
I feel real pride in the change, Sen tells me. Bidens decision wouldnt have been possible, she says, if it werent for many broader changes first, especially in the media. This would have been much harder for the administration to do if we hadnt first changed most journalistic and some governmental practice on the I-word. Many newsrooms including ours use illegal only to describe actions, and Sen had amplified that distinction. But shed met heavy resistance from some newsrooms whose editors construed her pitch as a call for euphemistic substitution rather than a material improvement to accurate reporting.
more...
https://www.motherjones.com/media/2021/02/illegal-alien-no-more-the-biden-administration-drops-the-label/
Eric Boehlert: What a mess -- Maureen Dowd lectures liberals about the press
What a mess Maureen Dowd lectures liberals about the press
Eric Boehlert
3 hr ago
Anxious to engage in Both Sides whitewashing of journalism failures from the Trump era, some prominent journalists are lashing out at liberals for having the nerve to criticize news coverage of the Biden White House. Leading the defensive charge is New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd, who penned a condescending harangue over the weekend, claiming liberals are hypocrites for finding fault with the press when a Democrat is in the Oval Office.
Embracing a straw man argument that Democrats "lionized" the media during the Trump years because they detested him so much, Dowd insists the left is guilty of hypocrisy because they can't take it when the media's critical lens focuses on Democrats. "The truth is, many on the left dont understand what a reporter is," Dowd lectured Times readers, most of whom know exactly what a reporter is.
Dowd's scolding was immediately picked up by other elite journalists on Twitter, who lent their voices to the idea that liberals don't understand how journalism works, and mocked Democrats for thinking the press should not hold their party accountable. (Spoiler: Zero Democrats actually think that.) By embracing that absurd claim, journalists feel free to dismiss criticism from the left, because they say it's not based in reality. That's a convenient dodge and it's also delusional.
First off, if Dowd thinks liberals spent four years lionizing the New York Times for its Trump coverage, then the Beltway bubble she lives in is even more impenetrable and remote than I thought. Progressives for years were rightly fuming over the Times' forced timidity when covering Trump the paper's failure to call out his lies, its never-ending attempt to normalize his radical behavior, and the daily's relentless, fawning coverage of Trump voters, who were depicted as the true voice of authentic America not the backbone for a looming insurrection.
Secondly, the idea that after four years of watching the Trump media circus, liberals think Beltway journalists are on their side, as Dowd claims, is beyond comical. Liberals understand perfectly well how this game is played and are under no illusions that the Times is doing the Democrats' bidding. In fact, quite the opposite.
This is the newspaper that waged war for eight years against the Bill Clinton presidency. The newspaper that mocked Democratic nominee Al Gore nearly every day of the 2000 campaign. The newspaper that co-sponsored the GOP's Iraq War, with some of the worst pre-war reporting in modern history. The newspaper that published all kinds of sexist attacks on Hillary Clinton in 2008 and 2016.
more...
https://pressrun.media/p/what-a-mess-maureen-dowd-lectures
Trump Calls Capitol Riots a 'Lovefest'
He's lost his marbles; has he not seen the videos?
https://politicalwire.com/2021/03/01/trump-calls-capitol-riots-a-lovefest/
Trump Calls Capitol Riots a Lovefest
March 1, 2021 at 6:42 am EST By Taegan Goddard 3 Comments
Said Trump: The press doesnt like to talk about it, but the real number was much, much bigger It was tremendous numbers of people, not the Capitol, Im talking about the rally itself, and it was a lovefest, it was a beautiful thing.
Litigation Tracker: Pending Criminal and Civil Cases Against Donald Trump
He's fooked.
Litigation Tracker: Pending Criminal and Civil Cases Against Donald Trump
by Karl Mihm, Jacob Apkon and Sruthi Venkatachalam
February 28, 2021
On both the criminal and civil litigation fronts, former President Donald Trump faces a bevy of lawsuits and investigations, with more cases likely to follow. Some are civil suits stemming from his pre-presidential business dealings. Others are defamation claims from women he allegedly assaulted. More still are criminal probes and civil actions that scrutinize his attempts to overturn the results of the 2020 election. The Chart below tracks all these cases. It will be continually updated as major legal developments occur.
These cases bear on two pressing questions. First, will Trump maintain his long streak of eluding legal liability in the face of so many lawsuits? Second, if Trump is held to account for illegal conduct, what impact will such a development have on hisand his familyspolitical and business fortunes?
Criminal chargesone would thinkwould be among the most damaging outcomes. After all, a criminal prosecution of a former president would be a singular event in American history. No former president has ever been indicted, much less convicted. Trump lost any immunity from indictment that he may have possessed as president the moment he left office on Jan. 20. To be sure, most of the criminal probes detailed below are in their infancy, so the odds of an actual conviction at this time remain improbable. Even so, the mere stigma of criminal charges against the former president could reshape the American political landscape and the historical understanding of Trumps behavior.
The civil cases could certainly do their fair share of damage as well, directly or indirectly. If Trump falters in one of his business-related suits, his companies may be subject to massive penalties, or worse. Even apart from such sanctions, his empire is reportedly struggling under looming debt obligations and reduced revenues, a slump which could worsen if his reputation continues to deteriorate.
With these legal threats bearing down on the former president from nearly every direction, this tracker collects them in one place. Below weve included key takeaways from each case along with case charts that explain the cases main issue, procedural posture, and any upcoming deadlines. We will continue to update this information as new filings are docketed, new details emerge, new plaintiffs come forward or drop out, and other significant developments in the cases occur. If you believe we are missing a significant issue or development, send us a message at [email protected].
more...
https://www.justsecurity.org/75032/litigation-tracker-pending-criminal-and-civil-cases-against-donald-trump/
Profile Information
Gender: FemaleHometown: NY
Home country: US
Current location: Florida
Member since: Mon Sep 6, 2004, 09:54 PM
Number of posts: 171,073