Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
mzmolly
mzmolly's Journal
mzmolly's Journal
March 9, 2014
....
More at FDA.Gov
FDA study helps provide an understanding of rising rates of whooping cough ~ FDA
There were 48,000 cases reported last year despite high rates of vaccination, said Anthony S. Fauci, M.D., director of the NIHs National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. This resurgence suggests a need for research into the causes behind the increase in infections and improved ways to prevent the disease from spreading.....
While the reasons for the increase in cases of whooping cough are not fully understood, multiple factors are likely involved, including diminished immunity from childhood pertussis vaccines, improved diagnostic testing, and increased reporting. With its own funds plus support from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the FDA conducted the study to explore the possibility that acellular pertussis vaccines, while protecting against disease, might not prevent infection.
There were 48,000 cases reported last year despite high rates of vaccination, said Anthony S. Fauci, M.D., director of the NIHs National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. This resurgence suggests a need for research into the causes behind the increase in infections and improved ways to prevent the disease from spreading.
The FDA conducted the study in baboons, an animal model that closely reproduces the way whooping cough affects people. The scientists vaccinated two groups of baboons one group with a whole-cell pertussis vaccine and the other group with an acellular pertussis vaccine currently used in the U. S. The animals were vaccinated at ages two, four, and six months, simulating the infant immunization schedule. The results of the FDA study found that both types of vaccines generated robust antibody responses in the animals, and none of the vaccinated animals developed outward signs of pertussis disease after being exposed to B. pertussis. However, there were differences in other aspects of the immune response. Animals that received an acellular pertussis vaccine had the bacteria in their airways for up to six weeks and were able to spread the infection to unvaccinated animals. In contrast, animals that received whole-cell vaccine cleared the bacteria within three weeks.
This research suggests that although individuals immunized with an acellular pertussis vaccine may be protected from disease, they may still become infected with the bacteria without always getting sick and are able to spread infection to others, including young infants who are susceptible to pertussis disease.
There were 48,000 cases reported last year despite high rates of vaccination, said Anthony S. Fauci, M.D., director of the NIHs National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. This resurgence suggests a need for research into the causes behind the increase in infections and improved ways to prevent the disease from spreading.
The FDA conducted the study in baboons, an animal model that closely reproduces the way whooping cough affects people. The scientists vaccinated two groups of baboons one group with a whole-cell pertussis vaccine and the other group with an acellular pertussis vaccine currently used in the U. S. The animals were vaccinated at ages two, four, and six months, simulating the infant immunization schedule. The results of the FDA study found that both types of vaccines generated robust antibody responses in the animals, and none of the vaccinated animals developed outward signs of pertussis disease after being exposed to B. pertussis. However, there were differences in other aspects of the immune response. Animals that received an acellular pertussis vaccine had the bacteria in their airways for up to six weeks and were able to spread the infection to unvaccinated animals. In contrast, animals that received whole-cell vaccine cleared the bacteria within three weeks.
This research suggests that although individuals immunized with an acellular pertussis vaccine may be protected from disease, they may still become infected with the bacteria without always getting sick and are able to spread infection to others, including young infants who are susceptible to pertussis disease.
More at FDA.Gov
Profile Information
Gender: Do not displayCurrent location: Minnesota
Member since: Sun Oct 19, 2003, 11:29 PM
Number of posts: 51,404