I wonder if along with declaring our preferred candidates

[kacekwl]

can we also include a Blue no matter who box to check ?

[TwilightZone]

1. It's supposed to be assumed...

but I like it.

I think most people on DU understand the threat another four years of Trump poses and will act accordingly, regardless of the eventual nominee. Some will be more enthusiastic than others, but that's how it always goes.

[Moderateguy]

2. Love the idea

Remind everyone that at the end of the day we are ONE. We will support our eventual nominee no matter who we supported in the primaries

[LongtimeAZDem]

3. It's a violation of the TOS to say otherwise, so it would be moot.

[TwilightZone]

5. If it stops the endless, "yeah, but will you vote for X in November" questions...

I'm all for it, even though it's supposed to be assumed that we all will, of course.

[LongtimeAZDem]

7. It won't; nobody is under oath, and there's no way to check. People willl say whatever they want

[TwilightZone]

8. Agreed, though we could just post...

"Look at the box!" as a stock response.

If anything, it would be slightly therapeutic and save a little time. haha

[Sympthsical]

10. Meh, plenty of people say otherwise.

Doesn’t seem to be a thing. Of course, it’s always against Sanders, so that’s probably coloring rule enforcement.

I will admit, a Bloomberg nomination would test me. A racist Republican? That’s the choice? Ugh. I’m Californian, so what I do doesn’t matter. But I’d still do it to bolster the Democratic popular vote, which is important for perception.

But I’d hate every misogynistic, oligarchic moment of it.

[Kaleva]

4. You already checked "Yes" on your My Accounts page.

[kacekwl]

6. I don't look at others accounts page.

Do others ?

[Kaleva]

9. If they are posting, then we know they selected "Yes". Can't post if you don't.