On Good Morning America now - talking head just said

[LiberalElite]

he needs a landslide in NY. That's bull, isn't it? He was back by how much before? Plus, they're now saying "he has an outside chance" of winning NY.

[HooptieWagon]

1. I dunno about needing a landslide.

If he wins by 10 points he makes a pretty good dent inClintons pledged delegate lead. Any win at all and he keeps up the momentum. Even if he loses he's still in the contest till the convention. Neither candidate will have 2383 pledged delegates.

[HereSince1628]

3. Clearly, all wins will help him. Yet,

I do think a win for Sanders in NY would make her early wins look distant.

Even a tie in NY would is a push for Sanders going into PA.

At the same time, the media has been wanting to proclaim Sanders definitively beaten since super-Tuesday and a loss even a virtual tie keeps that dream alive for the pro-corporatists.

[in_cog_ni_to]

2. That's bullshit. If he beats her in her "home" state (1 of 3), he wins the election. A loss or even

A close election in NY will be DEVASTATING to her campaign. If Bernie beats her, that's 9 out of the last 10 primaries and caucuses - he'll have even more momentum going into PA. and will win there - knock-out punches will be Oregon and CA.

PEACE
LOVE
BERNIE

[LiberalElite]

4. This time last year wasn't he considered

a "nuisance" candidate? Bernie was just getting warmed up.

[in_cog_ni_to]

5. Yep...that's why she and her corrupt corporate owned MSM ignored him for 9 months -

which was her DOWNFALL. Her arrogance in believing she was "the chosen one", was a huge, huge mistake.

Bernie warned her! "Don't underestimate me."

PEACE
LOVE
BERNIE

[winter is coming]

6. She thought he'd run out of money early in the game. Welp. n/t