Sat Apr 9, 2016, 03:01 PM
Robbins (5,066 posts)
from twitter-apparently clinton is cheating again
Bernie was winning untill they brought in "Surrogate Ballots" in one county
https://twitter.com/RiversDecas
|
18 replies, 4141 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Robbins | Apr 2016 | OP |
Else You Are Mad | Apr 2016 | #1 | |
HooptieWagon | Apr 2016 | #2 | |
yourpaljoey | Apr 2016 | #8 | |
SheilaT | Apr 2016 | #3 | |
Robbins | Apr 2016 | #4 | |
eridani | Apr 2016 | #17 | |
arcane1 | Apr 2016 | #5 | |
leftcoastmountains | Apr 2016 | #6 | |
artislife | Apr 2016 | #7 | |
bvar22 | Apr 2016 | #13 | |
artislife | Apr 2016 | #14 | |
Land of Enchantment | Apr 2016 | #9 | |
LiberalArkie | Apr 2016 | #10 | |
JEB | Apr 2016 | #11 | |
Land of Enchantment | Apr 2016 | #12 | |
bvar22 | Apr 2016 | #15 | |
farleftlib | Apr 2016 | #16 | |
Gwhittey | Apr 2016 | #18 |
Response to Robbins (Original post)
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 03:03 PM
Else You Are Mad (3,040 posts)
1. If that is true...
the shit is going to hit the fan big time.
|
Response to Robbins (Original post)
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 03:05 PM
HooptieWagon (17,064 posts)
2. They appear to be like absentee ballots.
Interesting that they were 100% for Hillary, and magically appeared just after the initial count favored Sanders.
|
Response to HooptieWagon (Reply #2)
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 03:13 PM
yourpaljoey (2,166 posts)
8. Dirty tricks!!!
Again, withe the dirty tricks.
|
Response to Robbins (Original post)
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 03:07 PM
SheilaT (23,156 posts)
3. I thought the whole point of a caucus,
and the thing that people complain bitterly about, is that you have to show up in person?
What's this "Surrogate Ballot" bullshit? |
Response to SheilaT (Reply #3)
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 03:09 PM
Robbins (5,066 posts)
4. They apparently are changing the rules for clinton
bunch of bullshit.Bernie may still win but they fixed it apparently so they will split delegates out of Wy and to try to slow down his
momenturm. |
Response to Robbins (Reply #4)
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 07:30 PM
eridani (51,907 posts)
17. Surrogate ballots are common in most caucus states
In WA State, conflicting work hours was added as a reason to send in an affidavit, in addition to the old categories of religious observance, military duty and disability. In WA, Clinton sent surrogate forms with paid postage to a selection of frequent voters. She would have lost by much more than she did without that tactic.
The downside of it for her is that those delegates are not likely to show up for the next level. |
Response to SheilaT (Reply #3)
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 03:10 PM
arcane1 (38,613 posts)
5. "Clearly you hate women. Or something."
I'm sure their excuse will be pretty much that stupid.
|
Response to SheilaT (Reply #3)
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 03:10 PM
leftcoastmountains (2,968 posts)
6. Yeah no kidding!
So what are they saying? Hey all you idiots that showed up.
You don't matter! Hill has this in the bag. |
Response to Robbins (Original post)
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 03:11 PM
artislife (9,497 posts)
7. Don't they know that if she secures the nomination
There will be very few people who haven't voted for her already who will.
She is so corrupt. |
Response to artislife (Reply #7)
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 03:53 PM
bvar22 (39,909 posts)
13. Yes....and all those Southern RED states she "won" early in the campaign?
They will be worth NOTHING in the GE. No "firewall" (as she liked to call her Black Supporters). She won't win a single one of her "firewall" states.
BTW: I would be offended if someone referred to me as their "firewall". What? It is my job to be burned up to protect the Royalty? Not me. |
Response to bvar22 (Reply #13)
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 03:59 PM
artislife (9,497 posts)
14. I am Latina...and she uses our votes
She barely does anything to really earn them.
|
Response to Robbins (Original post)
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 03:15 PM
Land of Enchantment (1,217 posts)
9. Dear Clintonistas,
And you wonder why we don't like her and don't trust her? It's really hard to beat the other team, the referees and all your play is uphill because the FIX was in since the DNC convention in August 2015 before a single vote was cast.
![]() |
Response to Robbins (Original post)
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 03:16 PM
LiberalArkie (15,132 posts)
10. That was always the problem with paper. Although "sealed" in a ballot box, it was easy to
open the box substitute your your candidates ballots and re-seal it. In south Arkansas, an all black percent would never vote for the black candidates. Although they said they did, none of the ballots ever showed they did.
|
Response to Robbins (Original post)
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 03:18 PM
JEB (4,748 posts)
11. Un-Democratic and un-democratic. Disgusting.
Response to Robbins (Original post)
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 03:42 PM
Land of Enchantment (1,217 posts)
12. This woman was on CNN with Fredrika this morning
effusing her support for HRC. Her name is Kathy Karpan and she is the former Secretary of State of WY. I guess if anyone knows how to stuff a ballot box with 'surrogate votes', whatever the hell that is, then she must be a real pro. Reminds me of Kenneth Blackwell of Ohio.
![]() http://trib.com/opinion/columns/karpan-hillary-is-best-choice-in-dems-issue-driven-campaign/article_c87c0270-641f-5d9c-acd0-54fa4a2f0e42.html "Living in a red state, it’s not often that Democrats in Wyoming have an outsized influence on national political races. But this Saturday, that all changes. That’s because the Wyoming Democratic caucus is this Saturday at 11 a.m. (to find out where your caucus location is, visit the Wyoming Democratic Party’s website at www.wyodems.org/find-my-county-caucus). Given the state of the nominating race, it will likely be one of the most meaningful and impactful votes a Wyoming Democrat will cast in years. As a Democrat since birth, I’m proud our Democratic candidates are waging a substantive, issue-driven campaign, especially when contrasted with the vituperative personal attacks and juvenile insults of the Republican race. That thoughtful debate of ideas and track records is exactly why it’s become so clear to me—and I hope will be clear to Wyoming Democrats who are caucusing this Saturday—that the one candidate with the depth of experience, understanding of the issues, and record of delivering results and getting things done is Hillary Clinton. I’ve known Hillary for nearly 25 years, since she invited me to join the U.S. delegation to the Winter Olympics in Lillehammer in 1994. During that time I’ve grown to admire and respect her intelligence, work ethic, accomplishments and heart."
|
Response to Land of Enchantment (Reply #12)
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 04:09 PM
bvar22 (39,909 posts)
15. Shades of Hatherine Harris in the rigged Florida election of 2000.
This whole mess is creeping me out.... beyond disgusted with the DNC and Democratic party Royalty.
The Democratic Party is no longer the Party of the Working/Middle Class & Poor, and hasn't been since 1992. Who ARE these people who have hi-Jacked the Party I once loved and worked my ass of for? |
Response to Robbins (Original post)
Sat Apr 9, 2016, 04:24 PM
farleftlib (2,125 posts)
16. I thought you had to be there
in caucus states. How does she get away with this in state after state?
|