Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tishaLA

(14,176 posts)
Wed Apr 8, 2015, 07:40 PM Apr 2015

The book trailer Facebook banned because of classical breasts

Pasadena's Prospect Park Books on April 1 published Michal Lemberger's short-story collection inspired by biblical women, After Abel & Other Stories. A short video promoting the book has endorsement blurbs from Rabbi David Wolpe of Sinai Temple; the foreword is by Jonathan Kirsch. But Facebook won't let Prospect Park upload the video because there are artistic images of women's bare breasts here and there.

Publisher Colleen Dunn Bates posts on Facebook: "Can I get a little censorship outrage here?"

Those famous pornographers Botticelli, Klimt, and Durer have offended their delicate Silicon Valley sensibilities. We appealed the rejection, because FB says there's an exception for depicting topless women if it is works of art, but we were denied -- they still seem to think we're peddling porn.

Please feel free to share the short book trailer to help us protest this nonsense. If it gets shared enough, maybe Sheryl Sandberg will take notice.
The video is not only safe for work, it's safe for children. Go figure.

http://www.laobserved.com/archive/2015/04/the_book_trailer_that_fac.php
>

I posted about this book, written by my dear friend Michal, about a month ago. Who knew a book of feminist reinterpretatons of stories from the Hebrew Bible could provoke Facebook like this? I guess even women in antiquity make men lose their shit.
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The book trailer Facebook banned because of classical breasts (Original Post) tishaLA Apr 2015 OP
wonderful. I go apeshit on this stuff in art... CTyankee Apr 2015 #1
I really don't know. ismnotwasm Apr 2015 #2

ismnotwasm

(41,976 posts)
2. I really don't know.
Wed Apr 8, 2015, 08:39 PM
Apr 2015

Because the breasts aren't framed for a kind of sexual consumption, but an artistic one? This is truly outrageous.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»The book trailer Facebook...