2016 Postmortem

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts) Sat Oct 24, 2015, 06:07 PM Oct 2015

Cognitive dissonance

We're doomed in 2016 if Clinton is nominated because she doesn't inspire anyone, but those damn Clinton supporters won't listen to reason because they're too emotional.

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Cognitive dissonance (Original Post) NuclearDem Oct 2015 OP

. DURHAM D Oct 2015 #1

And if that wasn't bad enough, now I've got Durhams bouncing on my sofas. NuclearDem Oct 2015 #4

better? DURHAM D Oct 2015 #6

We would be doomed because she would do Wall Streets bidding. JRLeft Oct 2015 #2

Ok then... DURHAM D Oct 2015 #3

No she would go UglyGreed Oct 2015 #5

She might hurt their feelings. JRLeft Oct 2015 #7

No she wouldn't dare UglyGreed Oct 2015 #9

Then We're Doomed Already! NonMetro Oct 2015 #8

Republicans will screw us immediately. The corporate Democrat will do it at a slower rate, JRLeft Oct 2015 #10

I agree, and IMO: NonMetro Oct 2015 #12

Ah! I Get It! Leith Oct 2015 #11

Her's are very emotional RobertEarl Oct 2015 #13

I care fu*kall about her supporters. 99Forever Oct 2015 #14

DURHAM D

(32,888 posts)

1. .

Reply to NuclearDem (Original post)

Sat Oct 24, 2015, 06:09 PM

Oct 2015

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)

4. And if that wasn't bad enough, now I've got Durhams bouncing on my sofas.

Reply to DURHAM D (Reply #1)

Sat Oct 24, 2015, 06:13 PM

Oct 2015

Shoo, I just had those steamed.

DURHAM D

(32,888 posts)

6. better?

Reply to NuclearDem (Reply #4)

Sat Oct 24, 2015, 06:17 PM

Oct 2015

JRLeft

(7,010 posts)

2. We would be doomed because she would do Wall Streets bidding.

Reply to NuclearDem (Original post)

Sat Oct 24, 2015, 06:11 PM

Oct 2015

DURHAM D

(32,888 posts)

3. Ok then...

Reply to JRLeft (Reply #2)

Sat Oct 24, 2015, 06:12 PM

Oct 2015

UglyGreed

(7,661 posts)

5. No she would go

Reply to JRLeft (Reply #2)

Sat Oct 24, 2015, 06:15 PM

Oct 2015

right up to those Wall Street bigwigs and tell them to behave or she would send them to bed without their bonuses. It worked in 2007 and by golly it will work again.

JRLeft

(7,010 posts)

7. She might hurt their feelings.

Reply to UglyGreed (Reply #5)

Sat Oct 24, 2015, 06:18 PM

Oct 2015

UglyGreed

(7,661 posts)

9. No she wouldn't dare

Reply to JRLeft (Reply #7)

Sat Oct 24, 2015, 06:23 PM

Oct 2015

She is progressive that knows how to play ball with the righties!!!!

NonMetro

(631 posts)

8. Then We're Doomed Already!

Reply to NuclearDem (Original post)

Sat Oct 24, 2015, 06:19 PM

Oct 2015

But we will be more doomed (is that even a concept?) if a Republican gets in, which is why:

Hillary Clinton wants you to VOTE! (For her)

OBEY!

JRLeft

(7,010 posts)

10. Republicans will screw us immediately. The corporate Democrat will do it at a slower rate,

Reply to NonMetro (Reply #8)

Sat Oct 24, 2015, 06:25 PM

Oct 2015

Last edited Sat Oct 24, 2015, 07:52 PM - Edit history (1)

both groups agree on what direction to take the country.

NonMetro

(631 posts)

12. I agree, and IMO:

Reply to JRLeft (Reply #10)

Sat Oct 24, 2015, 07:51 PM

Oct 2015

The GOP attack machine is just warming up with Benghazi and the e-mails. Wait 'til they really get going against her. We ain't seen nothing yet!

Leith

(7,858 posts)

11. Ah! I Get It!

Reply to NuclearDem (Original post)

Sat Oct 24, 2015, 06:43 PM

Oct 2015

Point: HRC doesn't inspire anyone.
Counterpoint: her ("uninspired&quot supporters are very emotional in their support.

That's pretty subtle, but it made me smile. Well done!

Sorry to spell out the explanation, but it looked like some responses didn't quite get it.

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)

13. Her's are very emotional

Reply to Leith (Reply #11)

Sat Oct 24, 2015, 09:20 PM

Oct 2015

We get it. And the Bernie supporters are very pragmatic and factual. Republicans win on emotion. Democrats win on facts and reason.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)

14. I care fu*kall about her supporters.

Reply to NuclearDem (Original post)

Sat Oct 24, 2015, 09:27 PM

Oct 2015

It's her history, policies, warmongering, cronies, dirty campaigning, and ties to the .01% that make her unelectable for me.

Ain't got jack shit to do with "emotions."

Reply to this discussion