2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDear Sanders Supporters
I love you folks! For months you've been hearing what terrible people you are, but I think your choice of candidate says a lot about you: intelligent, fair, honest, empathetic, forward-thinking progressives, who really desire to make this country a better home for all of us. Keep the faith, tune out the noise, and continue doing what you can to make the good man known as Bernie the next POTUS!
Autumn
(45,078 posts)He's the President we need and deserve, I love my fellow Bernie supporters too. Let's get this done for the future!
HockeyTown4Ever
(16 posts)The zeitgeist says that Bernie is not a serious candidate, when that changes Bernie is going to have to face a level of scrutiny that he has never seen before. We aren't sure how he is going to handle that.
Right now Bernie has 3 problems with the electorate in general
1. He's old and he looks old. That's not a plus versus any other candidate.
2. He's a Jew. Do not underestimate the anti-semitism still alive in this country.
3. He's a policy wonk. Sure, that's why we all love Bernie - we understand what he's saying and can apply that to our hopes for the future of our country. But, most people aren't really paying attention to or understand policy issues.
Finally, Bernie has a problem with women that is a little hard to explain so I'll just put it the way that my wife put it to me.
"We have a real opportunity, for the first time in the history of this nation, to elect a woman President. And you want me to vote for some old fart that can't be bothered to comb his hair?"
OUCH! But I understood her point.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)"he's a jew."
if you don't believe this crap, you are not helping anyone by repeating it. we all know the hrc/dnc/gop talking points.
the expression "with friends like these....." comes to mind
there are enough enemies of bernie spouting this filth. we don't need it coming from a supporter, if you are a bernie supporter.
please try and stay positive....,that is what will succeed!
HockeyTown4Ever
(16 posts)I did not say that I did not believe these things. I absolutely believe that these are the issues that Bernie will struggle with in a general election.
I can tell from your accusing response that you're all in for Bernie and there would be no point in continuing a discussion with you. It's great to be enthusiastic for your candidate but not the point of denying reality. I believe that these are the issues Bernie is going to have to deal with if he becomes the Democratic nominee.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)but we all know what obama faced as well..he faced virulent hatred and he is a two term president
our own negativity can defeat us as much as the gop smear machine
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Some people used to say, "he's black".
Aerows
(39,961 posts)and it upset me.
Duckfan
(1,268 posts)How unfortunate that some people seem to give up and let the status quo continue--opposed to fighting for something real without the extra calories and high in nutrition for a country.
Hope that made some sense with the analogy.
PosterChild
(1,307 posts).... and the American people are not going to elect a socialist.
olegramps
(8,200 posts)HockeyTown4Ever
(16 posts)I don't think Bernie's position on gun control will hurt him at all in the General election. As I understand his position, he is mildly pro-2nd Amendment. That's pretty much how the general electorate polls on gun control. His position may not help him much but I don't think it will hurt him either.
stage left
(2,962 posts)his hair is epic.
HockeyTown4Ever
(16 posts)My wife isn't as enlightened as you when it comes to politics. She doesn't pay attention to the polls, shows disdain for the debates and doesn't watch Fox or MSNBC. She's a pretty typical disengaged voter. I don't ever see her voting Republican but I also don't see her voting in the primary for a guy who, in her words, "looks like a Muppet".
We all love Bernie's policies but his image is what the disengaged voter responds to. Bernie needs to improve his image to improve his electability factor.
Think image isn't important? What have the Republicans been trying to do with HRC? Destroy her image. They try to paint a woman who has polled as the most admired woman in the world for 17 of the last 18 years as a serial liar. Look at the image they're trying to project for Fiorina. An actual bald-faced liar and business failure is truthful and somehow Presidential? The polls show how the unenlightened public falls for those story lines. Both George W. Bush and Barack Obama got elected on IMAGE!
When it comes to image, Bernie has a steep hill to climb.
Duckfan
(1,268 posts)complete sentences. Bernie is a Harvard Professor compared to the moron. And if people are only judging Bernie on how his hair looks, then I don't want to be near someone with that lack of intelligence or inability to get the earwax out and listen to what he says.
HockeyTown4Ever
(16 posts)...we have a whole nation full of people you wouldn't want to be near. Surprised that, after 2 terms of W, you haven't figured that out by now.
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)on the important issues. The only one with their heart in the important every day issues is Bernie...let her know get her motivated...come on you can do it.
valerief
(53,235 posts)HockeyTown4Ever
(16 posts)Why am I wasting time here? This isn't thoughtful discussion on how Bernie could improve his image and maybe get elected.
valerief
(53,235 posts)those things aren't even worth mentioning. Unless you want to stress them.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)If you want to discuss issues then have at it, but empty talking points that are meant as negative pot shots aren't thoughtful discussion. If thoughtful discussion is what you want then start one.
HockeyTown4Ever
(16 posts)and Bernie's campaign needs to deal with them right out of the gate. I want a Democrat to win the election and, if Bernie doesn't deal with his image issues I don't see how he will win. It is evident that you all see how Bernie can win but I'm still skeptical. I haven't seen him take on the issues that will make it tougher for him in the general election.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)In politics issues are the issues that the people and the country face.
What do you expect him to do to deal with your "issues"? Shave his head? Become a born again christian? Discover the fountain of youth?
You should stop with the smear mongering. You are not bringing up real issues, you are just trying to bring down Sanders. As you can see by his crowds, people are not concerned with your 'concerns'.
Are you concerned that Hillary dyes her hair? That she's old? That people don't trust her? That people don't like her? That she condones adultery? That she has an email problem? That she has a Benghazi problem?
See how that works? Is that what you want?
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)AdHocSolver
(2,561 posts)HockeyTown4Ever
(16 posts)...and she has a huge problem with Fiorina's image. Knowing nothing of her policies my wife sees Fiorina as a "hard faced bitch". Whatever that means, I don't think it's flattering.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)and vote for a woman who really seems to get it ... Elizabeth Warren.
I did not vote for Obama because he is black and by the same reasoning I won't for HRC (just) because she is a woman.
That is demeaning to every one involved including your wife.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)Last edited Sun Oct 4, 2015, 02:05 PM - Edit history (1)
..understand and cater to the country's ageist prejudices. Even though that's not what good feminists would really do.
Guess I'll stick, as a woman, with Bernie.
HockeyTown4Ever
(16 posts)...we aren't likely to resolve them in the next 18 months. If we don't understand them and adjust our own strategy to minimize their effect we're going to end up with President Trump.
Bernie is a great guy and promotes policies that we would love to see implemented, the trick is to get him elected. Ignoring the uninformed voter is something we Democrats do at our own peril. The undecided (read: uninformed) voter is the key to election victory. Like it or not, they vote based on image and their votes count just as much as ours.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)
.We should just stick with the same thinking that told us the country wasn't ready to elect a black man named Barack Hussain. Never happen, they told us.
smilingwen
(52 posts)I know LOTS of women, me included, who do not see anything on your list as a problem. I am all for a woman president if she is the best choice, but Bernie is the best choice!
HockeyTown4Ever
(16 posts)I haven't posted on this board for many months (years?). I'd forgotten why but now I am reminded. This is the left's version of Free Republic. Everyone here sees no problem with Bernie and assumes everything is all rainbows and glitter. I'm not that optimistic - I know that Conservatives will stop at NOTHING to win an election and I question whether Bernie has the metal and team in place to counteract their inevitable assault.
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)it does not make a difference. I am voting for the best choice and it is not someone who has lied, who is bed partners with Monsanto and Wall Street...woman or not it's the values and morals plus the genuine caring for the 99% that makes me vote for someone...Feel the Bern...
HockeyTown4Ever
(16 posts)...because you're an informed and partisan voter. About 1/3 of the electorate agrees with you. Another 1/3 vehemently disagrees with your assessments. Finally, the last 1/3 doesn't even pay attention.
It's that last 1/3 that decides the election and it's largely based on image. That's why the GOP has been hell-bent on destroying HRC's image and why Bernie needs to work on his. Whomever our candidate is they need to WIN the election.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)You get to speak for the people and we only get to speak for us.
What a joke.
Why are you posting here all of a sudden when you've been a member since 2001? You're very busy in this thread for some reason. Hm... wonder why that is?
Bernie can win the general. Hillary can't. For your very reason. Republicans HATE Hillary. NONE of them will vote for her. Bernie has appealed to many moderate Republicans already and also many indies.
So you can relax and stop being so 'concerned' now.
MoveIt
(399 posts)Member since: 2001
Number of posts: 14
Number of posts, last 90 days: 12
Favorite forum: General Discussion: Primaries, 11 posts in the last 90 days (92% of total posts)
artislife
(9,497 posts)azmom
(5,208 posts)Autumn
(45,078 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Autumn
(45,078 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Autumn
(45,078 posts)and their candidate and we should stick to ours, they can't change our minds and we can't change theirs. DU will be a better place.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)And you're absolutely right, no one on DU is paying any attention to the smears outside of GDP.
It's okay to call them out when they're dishonest but best to leave the obvious flamebait to them.
Autumn
(45,078 posts)I responded to this OP knowing full well it was flame bait and had nothing to do with the issues.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251643334
You know who kept that OP alive? We Bernie supporters did that, look at the responses. Even the HRC supporters wouldn't touch that OP.
We need to stop doing that. Concentrate on each other and getting Bernie elected. We Sanders need to take the first step to end the nastiness.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)If anyone deserves to be ignored it's the ones who post at sites that troll DU for fun - because their agenda is clear.
Autumn
(45,078 posts)of falling for the divisive game and end the nastiness here on DU. Leave them to do what they choose, we as supporters of Bernie Sanders need to make the choice to be better
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Exploiting a tragedy by blaming Bernie even though he is pro-gun control is despicable.
DUers should be attacking Republicans, not Dem candidates who are on the same side of the issue.
That said I'm going to try to go back to ignoring the bullshit.
Autumn
(45,078 posts)Respond once and then move on. No arguments no useless back and forth. DU will be a better place.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)It's all about the facts, bout the facts, bout the facts, no bullshit!
(sung to the melody of 'It's all About the Bass' by Meghan Trainor)
Autumn
(45,078 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)How many of these new trolls are Hillary supporters who supposedly left DU for their safe forum, but come back now under a different name to troll us? Hmmmmm.
artislife
(9,497 posts)There seems to be no learning curve and they post a lot of OPs. And they sound familiar.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Not if they are telling lies about Sanders or spreading GOP memes.
But of course most of them are about how "awful" we are, and little is said about Sanders' positions or history (except lies and misinfo)
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)No need to feed under bridge dwellers and waste your time when there are so many other great threads here to kick and rec!
Autumn
(45,078 posts)personal attacks. If it's not about Sanders in GDP we shouldn't even respond to the thread. That way there is no division or hard feelings.
William769
(55,146 posts)Sorry to hear you will not be serving on juries anymore.
What a bummer.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)Autumn
(45,078 posts)Last edited Sat Oct 3, 2015, 06:56 PM - Edit history (1)
I no longer have to donate. I haven't found a downside yet .
zappaman
(20,606 posts)When DU goes back to DU and rallies around the candidate in GE!
reddread
(6,896 posts)and i look forward to your supporting the candidate we do.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)Won't everybody?
reddread
(6,896 posts)Autumn
(45,078 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)One less DUer trying to silence other posters, it's a shame more aren't committed to doing the same thing.
EDITED.
Autumn
(45,078 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Autumn
(45,078 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)But I'm still posting it when it's relevant.
cali didn't deserve to get targeted like that. No one does.
Autumn
(45,078 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)On Sat Oct 3, 2015, 07:13 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Is that "selfish" troll still on MIRT?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=645069
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Calling a member of MIRT a troll is way over the top. Also it would be for any DU member. Please hide this to let this person that this is not ok to do.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Oct 3, 2015, 07:22 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: When trolls are obvious they should be called out.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I think it's OK. Jus' sayin'.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
MIRT needs to clean it's own house.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)I guess it's only okay to the alerter for MIRT members to actively alert stalk other DU members.
Hm... that doesn't seem right.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)Mail Message
On Sat Oct 3, 2015, 07:13 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Is that "selfish" troll still on MIRT?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=645069
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Calling a member of MIRT a troll is way over the top. Also it would be for any DU member. Please hide this to let this person that this is not ok to do.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Oct 3, 2015, 07:22 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: When trolls are obvious they should be called out.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I think it's OK. Jus' sayin'.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
cui bono
(19,926 posts)There isn't even a name mentioned... but that MIRT member did admit to actively alert stalking cali to get her a fifth hide. Does the alerter think that's okay?
I wonder...
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Nice to see you!
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Those are the breaks. You break the rules, you take your chances.
Btw, have you banned the person who posted the bigoted garbage that polluted your site yet? Thankfully we have a system on this site that rids it of such individuals as quickly as possible.
Ugh, wouldn't click that link again for a million bucks.
And btw, I agree with the OP, Bernie supporters, growing in number by the minute, are incredibly wonderful.
Go Bernie!
Woot!
Just heard! Over 26,000 in Boston today for Bernie! The man is like the energizer bunny, he just keeps on gathering more and more support!
cui bono
(19,926 posts)Sorry to see you are still promoting a hate filled smear mongering site.
What a bummer.
William769
(55,146 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)You know very well last weekend was EPIC with screenshots of your vile hate spewing site all over DU.
William769
(55,146 posts)Here. And it won't look kindly on you.
They can even go look for themselves. Anyone interested just follow the link in my sig line.
Also if you think it's a hate site, please I beg you report it to the SPLC. Then this matter of a "hate site" can be cleared up.
Balls in your court.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)You hide all the evidence in the secret basement and then invite everyone to come look in the living room as proof that there's nothing to find. You really do think we are stupid over here, don't you.
That's rich. We all know you hid the worst of it from public view. It is astounding that you think no one knows what's going on. Like a 7 year old lying to their parents about something that they clearly know about.
Now you're really showing how immature you are.
Okay... jury... he asked for the links and the evidence... Drumroll please...
(thank you)
Start here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=616648
That'll keep you busy.
Then go here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1280&pid=54711
This one is good:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251626478
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=626601 <--- screenshot here
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=626526 <--- screenshot here
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=626590 <--- be sure to read this post about "your" juries
Here's an OP started by one of your favorite DUers:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251623308
If that doesn't convince you... well even if it does, you'll never admit it. But thanks for getting me to put them all in one place. Now I can add this post to my journal for reference.
<--- right back atcha!
okasha
(11,573 posts)you know very well that your post is a misrepresentation.
I'm assuming you have been back. Frequently.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)I understand he - and apparently you - would like people to think that it is. But as I stated in my post, he has merely put the filth out of sight. It still continues in the secret area. And even if it doesn't, he allowed and participated in and promoted the site with all the vile hatred on it, and the "Issues" forum was closed the whole time until he got ridiculed for that.
So no. Running and promoting a site that spews filth for a month in several forums while having the "Issues" forum remain unopened and closed to posting shows exactly what that site and William - aka Bill - are all about.
I provided the documentation he demanded. Now he can live with it. And you can live with defending the hate and venom.
The only saving grace is that you guys are actually ashamed of it as evidenced by the attempt at a cover up, even if it is done as a denial.
okasha
(11,573 posts)I'll tell you a secret.
That "hidden" part of the site goes straight to Roswell. This will keep you safe:
cui bono
(19,926 posts)if he loses.
Talk about
No reason to think the members only forum is a conspiracy - it's right there for everyone to not be able to get into. I don't know where you came from but the more you try to convince others that what I say isn't true, well me thinks thou doth protest too much.
Go ahead and have the last word. I can see you need it. Make it good.
It's actually wonderful that you are kicking this particular OP by defending the hate filled Clinton Cave.
okasha
(11,573 posts)by how you manage to see what's allegedly hidden in a secret forum. How do you do it? Is it pure ESP? Do you use a "peep stone" as Joseph Smith claimed he did? Do you hear voices?
Enquiring minds want to know.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)They usually get hidden here but not at that site where accusing Bernie of having a nest egg in Israel is just fine.
It's hard to believe they're still trying to defend that bigotry.
Thank dawg for DU's TOS.
Autumn
(45,078 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,814 posts)... and tell us how anyone who posts here is in a position to label any other site as a "hate filled smear mongering site".
cui bono
(19,926 posts)Now please, please, please provide examples of anything on DU that is 1/10 as bad as that smut. The whole reason you guys post over there is to say the vile shit you would get time outs for here. Oh, no, also to plot about who you will alert stalk next and apparently how to get your own jury over here. Yep, read about it at the link. It's got pretty pictures too! Okay, not so pretty, just pretty ugly.
NanceGreggs
(27,814 posts)... the PMs don't fly around here suggesting who to "target" for hides, who to "go after", who is ripe to be swept into an argument that will lead to something "alertable".
You are either incredibly naive, or unbelievably - well, let's just leave it at incredibly naive.
Here on DemocraticUnderground, President Obama has been called every vile name one can think of. It has been posted here that he is "on the take", has made secret deals with corporations for money to be paid to him after he leaves office, is a "secret Republican" set-up in the WH to do their bidding, a Trojan Horse, a Manchurian Candidate - even a "piece of shit used car salesman", a lovely piece that adorned the Home Page of this "Democratic" site.
There has been no Democrat spared - Reid, Pelosi, Dean, etc. It's difficult to take DemocraticUnderground seriously when it's been a repository for every anti-Dem comment conceivable - and now even includes links to RW bullshit profferred as valid reportage.
What's amusing is how many posters here are livid over the idea that DU members are being talked about on another site, while they have absolutely NO problem with how Democrats are talked about here on DemocraticUnderground. You'd think that Democrats would be more concerned with what gets said about their fellow Party members and elected representatives. But then how many actual Democrats are even active here anymore?
Given what's been posted here - and continues to be posted here - about the President, our Dems in office, and the Party as a whole, getting your knickers in a twist over comments on another site about DU's posters is beyond ludicrous.
Hey, you people wanted the HRC supporters off this site. Well, congratulations! A lot of us have gone elsewhere, and the fact that you are obsessed with what gets said there as opposed to what gets said here speaks for itself.
The real problem people here are having is that HRC supporters are leaving DU - which means there's no one to bully, call names, intimidate, and harass. Unfortunately for many DUers, that's taken all the fun out of posting here at all. It's a classic case of be careful what you wish for.
Again, take a look around DU, and look at what's been said about HRC supporters, Obama supporters, Democratic Party supporters - and then tell me how anyone who posts that bullshit is in a position to comment on the "hatred" that gets posted elsewhere.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)and spewing vile hatred towards people of a website that you participate on.
But go ahead and keep right on defending the hatred and justifying your participation in it. It's good to know who thinks that that is just fine and dandy. Many are happy to see the true character of those they encounter on DU. Go ahead and read the threads at my links, you'll see how people were flabbergasted by the behavior exhibited over there. And if it is so squeaky clean, why the need to clean it up?
I will tell you since you asked me to, that people on here are in a very good position to post about the hatred you guys spew over there, and your coordinated attacks against DUers because it actually happens and has been documented as shown above.
It is a fact. Deal with it.
NanceGreggs
(27,814 posts)Again you are more concerned with what gets said about DU members than you are about the hatred towards Democrats that gets spewed on DemocraticUnderground on a daily basis.
We've seen where your priorities lie. That's why we went elsewhere. You don't give a flying fuck what gets said about Democrats - your only concern is what gets said about the people who post here.
Well, DU is pretty much all yours now - it belongs to the RW trolls, the Paulbots, the Libertarians, and god knows what else.
Maybe if you weren't so bored to death with what gets posted here, you wouldn't be so obsessed with what gets posted elsewhere.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)I get it. You hate DU. You hate DU so much you can't stay away. If you went elsewhere because you hate DU and its members so damn much... well... why do you keep coming back?
NanceGreggs
(27,814 posts)... just common sense.
You are more concerned with what gets said about DU posters than you are with what gets said about Democrats on a "Democratic" site. That's apparent.
Why do I post here? Why don't you pose that question to the posters here who have never, ever said a single positive thing about the Party, its elected reps, or its members? Why don't you ask them why they joined a "Democratic" website for the sole purpose of disparaging Democrats?
You obviously think it's terrible that Democrats who support a Democrat (HRC) have moved to a site where Democrats gather. Why do you have no problem with all of the anti-Dem bullshit that gets posted here?
Again, you might want to look around at what does get posted here - it's a real eye-opener as to what - uh - "Democrats" have to say about the party they allegedly belong to.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)On that we can agree!
Maybe we should end on a positive note rather than have you continue to post the type of thing you are complaining about. As to your characterizations of me, they are completely illogical and off the mark. You just not making any sense. And it makes no sense that you keep coming back to DU just to complain about DU and how awful it is. Newsflash: you don't have to read DU. It's not a requirement of anything that I know.
Go do something that makes you smile. You could use it.
NanceGreggs
(27,814 posts)This is (allegedly) a Democratic site - and if I want to complain about all of the anti-Democratic shit that's allowed to be posted here, I will do so.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)to come to this site that you go do something that puts a smile on your face. I thought it was a good idea and helpful solution.
As it is, you're complaining about DU's something or other that you believe exists here, and then you come here and post these really angry posts disparaging DU and its members that are pretty much exactly what you are complaining about (Democrats post here). So I'm not sure I understand why you keep coming here and posting here since you are only making it exactly what you claim to despise and "run away" from to the other totally vile and hate-filled site where you apparently gleefully participate in said hatred by your posts on DU defending it.
I'm just really confused. You seem to be putting yourself into a situation where you just keep spiraling into more and more anger. And that's why I suggested you go do something that will put a smile on your face. Life is a lot easier when you are not so angry all the time.
NanceGreggs
(27,814 posts)You BS supporters are constantly telling other posters that they're angry, their blood is boiling, and/or they're "terrified" of everything. Classic projection.
Why I post here is, quite frankly, none of your business. But I AM a Democrat, and will defend Democrats whenever and wherever I please.
"Democrats post here. Some of the people who post here are Democrats. But a LOT of them aren't. Again, your main concern is what gets said about fellow posters here - you have absolutely no concern about what gets said about Democrats - regardless of how vile, how vicious, how RW bullshitty the comments here are.
As for the HRC site being "hate-filled", we're back to square one. Take a good fuckin' look around DU and tell yourself that the disgusting things that get posted here daily aren't full of hate.
I am not the least bit angry - what I am is truly appalled at what this place has become. And I will complain about, comment on it, and defend Democrats and the Party on what still pretends to be a Democratic site, whether it suits you or not.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)Got it done this morning actually! Man, it feels so good... gotta love chiropractors!
If you are not the least bit angry you certainly are doing a fantastic job of impersonating someone who is. Not to mention someone who complains and complains and complains about something they are constantly doing themselves. What's that called again?
And listen, we both know why you all post over at the Clinton Cave, because you guys would get hides and time outs for posting that vile filth over here. So no. DU is simply not as you describe it to be, go ahead and document it if it is, you've seen the documentation of the shit posted at the Clinton Cave. I realize you need to make that false equivalence in order to justify participating in that slime pit, but it just isn't true. Many DUers have compared the Clinton Cave to the Conservative Cave and that's how they gave it its nickname. It didn't just happen in fantasyland, it happened because the forums are almost indistinguishable from the other Cave. Except I don't think the other Cave has methods to get their "own juries". Perhaps they do try to come here and alert stalk like you guys, I really don't know that much about it having only peeked in there once when I first heard about it.
I'm still flabbergasted that you just can't stop insulting DU and its members and yet you really want to be here and post angry posts all over the place. You sought out this argument and you have been nothing but rude and angry in every post you've made in this exchange. I guess I don't understand why someone would keep coming back to wallow in what they think is a disgusting hate-filled place. It is truly dumbfounding. Yet somewhat fascinating.
Now seriously, go do something that makes you smile. You could really, really use it. No one should have to be so angry all the time.
NanceGreggs
(27,814 posts)And quite frankly, it's boring me to tears.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)You're welcome.
And btw... I don't think "projecting" means what you think it does. But don't worry, I won't ask you to apologize. I wouldn't want you to have to become an "apologist".
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)I really don't have time for their raindeer games.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I'm guessing the marlin didn't make it, too bad, I was rooting for him.
But we're not fish and we're going to win this!
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)I'll bet it was the call of the dude that the fish pegged with a deck chair.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Any creature that fights that hard to survive deserves another shot at it!
azmom
(5,208 posts)LOL
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)jtuck004
(15,882 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)That morphs rapidly into territory that the ideas we support aren't needed either.
There's a trick here - power is necessary to achieve. Of COURSE it is. But when the system favours people making and acting on the observation that the nature of the achievement must be mutable in order to acheive ANYTHING then the influence of their achievements tends to become inreasingly shallow and impermanent.
Usually you end up with aiming for the lowest hanging fruit.
The rest of the fruit starts to rot.
Before long the branches are bare.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)We can must do better.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)largely invisible to the triangulator - it tends to pull the entire system in the direction tended to by triangulation.
I think Republicans understand this far better than Democrats.
The triangulator often doesn't spot this.
You don't see Republicans trying to appeal to the left, do you?
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)I agree.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
HelenWheels
(2,284 posts)as you will need it. Bernie is wonderful but he is not going to make it. Even if he would win the primary there is no chance in hell he would win the election. Sorry, in a perfect world he would win but we do not live in a perfect world. If you refuse to vote for Hilary you will be dooming us all to a Repuke takeover with all that entails.
blondie58
(2,570 posts)When enough people- especially the Young, show up to vote for him.
WHEN CRABS ROAR
(3,813 posts)Now is the time for a real progressive populist movement, but the message needs to be clear and not overly complex and it needs to be repeated over and over to drive it home into the minds of the people.
Then Bernie will win.
jkbRN
(850 posts)No need to come here with that type of rhetoric. People will vote for Hillary if they want to--HRC supporters need to stop telling everyone what to do (this includes you).
I live in CA, so I'm not gonna go out and vote for her in the general election--she'll win this state in the GE IFFFFF she becomes the nominee. So please stop telling everyone what to do--I have a feeling you are just driving people further away from even wanting to support her for the GE, if she were to win the primaries. (at least that's what happened for me).
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)I'm sorry but that's just not a logically coherent statement.
If you think Sanders is wonderful... then vote for him. help him win. That's how it works.
thesquanderer
(11,986 posts)I think it will be very tough for him to win the nomination, but if he does, I think he has the better chance of winning the general!
Some related thoughts...
... all the national polls are pointless, because president's aren't selected by majority vote (just ask Al Gore). You have to look at the states, and specifically, the states that are in play. (i.e. no Republican will take New York away from either Hillary or Bernie.) It's really way too early and there's been too little state-specific polling, but along those lines, this article is interesting:
http://www.politicususa.com/2015/07/22/poll-crucial-swing-states-shows-sanders-electable-clinton.html
... The right is more anti-Hillary than they are anti-Bernie, they've been stoking hillary-hate for decades, they can't possibly whip up that much hate for Bernie in a matter of months. There is a group who will be motivated to come out just to vote against Hillary, regardless of who the Republican candidate is. Sanders won't have that strike against him.
... The right, like the left, has a contingent that is just sick of "business as usual" (hence the popularity of Trump/Carson/Fiorina). Assuming the Republicans end up nominating a more conventional candidate, some of these voters may stay home rather than vote for either a Bush (or similar) or a Clinton, but may just consider voting for Bernie as a kind of poke in the eye to the establishment. And there are libertarian-style people on the right who may be drawn to Sanders on things like the patriot act, foreign policy, warrantless wiretapping and the like. He certainly isn't their ideal candidate, but "half a Paul" may be better than none, if the alternative is a mainstream Republican. Republicans do sometimes vote for Democrats (and vice versa)... you can't assume they are all a lost cause. I think Bernie can potentially get more of them than Hillary can. He supposedly got 25% of the republican vote in Vermont.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2015/09/18/bernie_sanders_i_got_25_of_the_republican_vote_in_vermont.html
(And I'm sure Hillary got Republican votes in New York, too.)
... There are so many other variables that will alter the landscape between now and the GE. For example, maybe you'd see a Sanders candidacy more positively with the right running mate (Elizabeth Warren?), or against a given opponent. I think it's awfully early for anyone to be saying he'd have "no chance in hell."
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Well, she didn't make it the last time so I don't know why you think she will this time.
See...she lost the last primary.... to an unknown black man. That is fact.
Your speculation has little to stand on.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)mild discomfort.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)/bye.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)That we are in the shape we are in now. You know what they say about doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different outcome?
Well, this time, we are going to fight for a different outcome.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)"Vote for the Lesser of Two Goods in the Primary, so that we must vote for the Lesser of Two Evils in the General."
I've got a better idea: let's vote for the better candidate in both.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)Don't make it tempting.
eridani
(51,907 posts)Vinca
(50,270 posts)She was moving and holding a yard sale for Bernie. I didn't really want anything, but I thought it was such a nice thing to do I bought something anyway.
jkbRN
(850 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)And another reason why I love Bernie's supporters!
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)SMC22307
(8,090 posts)I don't remember how much we raked in (seems so long ago), but it was great fun.
retrowire
(10,345 posts)SMC22307
(8,090 posts)and I laugh and I laugh when I hear they've switched from B to H because of anonymous posters on DU and social media. Seriously, LAUGH.
Wait, I take that back... the name-calling and idiotic accusations do make me work harder to get Bernie Sanders elected. So for that, Hillionaires and select #BLMers, I thank you!
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)And then suddenly "Bawww, bernie supporters MADE me support clinton, wubwubwub!"
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)and prolific poster at their adorable new website, who absolutely TRASHED Hillary in 2008. It's a puzzler!
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Is the one sporting a sig image of Obama "brushing off" some ugly slander Clinton dealt at him in 2008.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)haven't noticed that one yet.
artislife
(9,497 posts)Which is okay, since my Community gif was copied from a H supporter here way back.
But I used it when I was being swarmed by H bees early on. I still got a hide from a response. Oh well.
But I used it to irk them, well because why President Obama was doing it. But that seems to lost on them.
I also am sad that they don't get the Mean Girls movie photos I use, but that could be generational.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)..... we should rally around the one...Hillary.... to fight the GOP!"
Uh... hello.... that's the GENERAL election, not the primaries where we do "fight" each other for the nomination!
Just wait till the debates..... as few and terribly timed as they are....
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)"we Dems" or "we liberals" or 'we progressives" are gonna be flat-out bullshit. Depends on the poster, of course, and their avatar (Che! Birkenstocks!).
Yeah, I'm not ready to make nice during the primaries; the GE is another story. Social Security and Medicare are my pony issues, and if they think I'm going to go quietly, they're sorely mistaken. I don't trust "The One" on those issues -- at all. Sanders yes, and what I'm learning of O'Malley, yes.
Duval
(4,280 posts)and then some!!
mak3cats
(1,573 posts)...he simply has the better ideas. And that's the end of the story.
I've tried to make it a point not to discuss Mrs. Clinton or her supporters at all. There is really no reason to go negative on our fellow DUers.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)And a much better record.
turbinetree
(24,695 posts)and we need to get like minded progressive democrats elected in both state and federal houses, to help Bernie
Whatchamacallit------------------Thankyou
Honk---------------------for a political revolution Bernie 2016
WHEN CRABS ROAR
(3,813 posts)Now is the time for a real progressive populist movement, but the message needs to be clear and not overly complex and it needs to be repeated over and over to drive it home into the minds of the people.
Then Bernie will win.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)We finally have a candidate we can be excited about. Believe me. There is no way in hell they can dampen our spirits.
azmom
(5,208 posts)azmom
(5,208 posts)Correct. Bernie's vision for America is one that calls for justice and equality for all. It is a just and moral cause.
The fact that we are all working so hard to make this a reality is an inspiration in itself. I love all of you and I am honored to be part of this group.
If we stand together there is nothing we can't do. Spread the good message far and wide.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)azmom
(5,208 posts)And spreading his message. There are still people out there that have not heard about him.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)We've done so well already on social media and by good old fashioned wom!
azmom
(5,208 posts)We hit it out of the park. The campaign is doing great.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)No $2700/plate dinners for Bernie, it's been grassroots all the way!
The people are speaking, America needs to listen.
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Read it again:
We hit it out of the park. The campaign is doing great.
Awwww, too bad, you dug this up for nothing.
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)because it was last year or the year before. Gotcha.
Yeah, that pretty much does away with any pretext that this is anything more than an argument to attack Clinton. You don't even care that he's been telling the public for ages he doesn't raise money from Wall Street, when in fact he does.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I realize how disappointed you must be, digging in the dirt for something to smear Bernie with and only looking dirty yourself in the end but you'll get over it.
Your candidate made MILLIONS peddling her influence on Wall Street, don't even pretend that raising money to campaign with is the same thing.
When Bernie sells himself to corporations like that come back and see me.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)GREAT thread, whatchamacallit, we love you back!
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)randr
(12,412 posts)Said he is the first candidate in his life that is telling the truth.
My friend is in his 80,s and was a very successful wall street worker.
He thinks many of the smarter Republicans will come to the same conclusion.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)Zorra
(27,670 posts)ChiciB1
(15,435 posts)I'm in, let's goooooooooo!
Uncle Joe
(58,360 posts)Thanks for the thread, whatchamacallit.
Juicy_Bellows
(2,427 posts)Hungry for a Sanders win and for a tasty
Cheers!
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)with any garbage, thoughtful, informed, young, old, Black, White, Latino, Dem, Repub, Independent, Libertarian, formerly NON Voters, poor, disabled, women, men, iow, they are the PEOPLE!
Oh and the 'Bernie supporters are horrible' routine is clearly a Dark Money Funded Think Tank Talking Point. Laugh at it as that is what it deserves.
silenttigersong
(957 posts)Is the REAL DEAL_LION of the people
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)That's why I pick Bernie.
MasonDreams
(756 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Oh wait,...it's not.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)operatives who are struggling so hard to earn that Corporate money and in a way you have to feel sorry for them.
Look at Brock eg, he has become a laughing stock since his interview with those two reporters and his sneaky, though not very clever to hide his identity as he lied about Sanders.
Instead he helped raise over on million dollars for BERNIE! Lol!
Talk about blowback! But then we're talking about 'Blinded by the Money' Brock, the man who tried to bring down a Dem President then switched sides when ever rightwingers couldn't take him.
Meantime, Sanders continues to soar, his attackers, the usual suspects, struggling to earn all that corporate money that so pollutes our electoral system, and having a really hard time doing so.
Maybe Bernie's opponents should just try being open and honest and talk about the issues themselves, for a change.
Because the old ways sure aren't working this time.
secondwind
(16,903 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)in January of '17. Let the best Person win and he has that tittle by a wide margin. People will come out in droves to vote for him, both us oldies and our children and grand children.
We hear what all the candidates are saying and not a one of them are resonating with the people of this country like Bernie Sanders does.
We will have a new awaking.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)the pejoratives and out-right slander hurled our way, and we are doing a great job of it. Every single time we let false accusations roll off of us like water off a duck's back and stick to the issues, we get a little bit stronger.
Steel isn't ordinary; it's Berned