Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 06:48 PM Aug 2015

HRC's college education plan much more comprehensive

It doesn't just cater to middle class white kids, IMO. It's a riff off of Obama's with some extra tweaks added, and things Warren has supported and suggested as well.

"Clinton's plan would provide tuition-free community college, which Clinton's campaign says would save Massachusetts students around $10,700 over two years.

Clinton's plan would cut the interest rate on student loans so that government does not profit from student loans - an idea Warren previously proposed. It would allow people with existing student loans to refinance them at lower interest rates. A Massachusetts borrower who is paying 6.8 percent interest on $30,000 in loans would see his monthly payments fall by up to $33, according to the Clinton campaign. This would apply to borrowers who attend private and public universities.

The plan would expand an existing program for income-based loan repayment. It would expand education benefits for veterans and AmeriCorps volunteers. It would crack down on deceptive marketing by for-profit schools, allow the use of financial aid for adult learning and online courses, and require colleges and universities to bear some risk when graduates default on loans.

Clinton's plan would be paid for by limiting the tax deductions and credits available to high-income taxpayers."

http://www.masslive.com/politics/index.ssf/2015/08/us_rep_katherine_clark_praises.html

52 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
HRC's college education plan much more comprehensive (Original Post) MaggieD Aug 2015 OP
Uh no. It doesn't say how it's going to get paid for. short circuit Aug 2015 #1
Yes it does - read again MaggieD Aug 2015 #2
Great. Doesn't help the poor short circuit Aug 2015 #3
Of course it does... MaggieD Aug 2015 #5
Qualified students can attend college AgingAmerican Aug 2015 #13
I think making sure we are helping minorities be qualified. MaggieD Aug 2015 #15
A GED will work AgingAmerican Aug 2015 #18
Why not just fund K-12 so they can... MaggieD Aug 2015 #19
You do it all AgingAmerican Aug 2015 #20
On what data do you base that belief? MaggieD Aug 2015 #32
What belief? AgingAmerican Aug 2015 #34
KNR! An actual policy proposal that can work. SonderWoman Aug 2015 #4
I agree MaggieD Aug 2015 #6
wouldnt that be over the top awesome. i had never considered that. a woman pres and vp seabeyond Aug 2015 #21
Cheerleading mediocrity AgingAmerican Aug 2015 #35
It's a work of performance art JackInGreen Aug 2015 #7
All I did was link to facts about the proposal MaggieD Aug 2015 #8
Ikr? "white kids" beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #14
It's the beady red eyes JackInGreen Aug 2015 #23
I see them lurking outside my window at night... beam me up scottie Aug 2015 #49
There was nothing subtle... ljm2002 Aug 2015 #24
Seriously? Garrett78 Aug 2015 #9
It matches the Warren proposal MaggieD Aug 2015 #16
Here are some facts about avg debt and monthly payment MaggieD Aug 2015 #17
Only student loan relief plan I support Roy Ellefson Aug 2015 #10
Her plan includes the Warren proposal to.... MaggieD Aug 2015 #12
The bankers we bailed out paid us back Recursion Aug 2015 #22
Very reasonable and viable postatomic Aug 2015 #11
Both Bernie's and Hillary's plans... ljm2002 Aug 2015 #25
Under the terms you have outlined postatomic Aug 2015 #48
So where did this come from: ljm2002 Aug 2015 #50
The investment firm where that poster works? MoveIt Aug 2015 #52
Colleges and universities have to bear some risk when graduates default on loans? That's a bad idea Vattel Aug 2015 #26
Focus-group tested pandering. nt Romulox Aug 2015 #27
Baseless allegation MaggieD Aug 2015 #30
This is a great education plan Gothmog Aug 2015 #28
Good read. Thank you. nt. SouthernProgressive Aug 2015 #29
K&R ismnotwasm Aug 2015 #31
Actually you are wrong. O'Malley has the most comprehensive plan on College education. FSogol Aug 2015 #33
I don't like O'Malleys plan too much, but it is comprehensive. Vattel Aug 2015 #36
Rewarding graduation rates is more aimed at for-profit colleges, which are really horrible at FSogol Aug 2015 #38
In Maryland, O'Malley fought to keep state support for universities high. Vattel Aug 2015 #39
Getting states to freeze tuition is only one small part of his plan, FSogol Aug 2015 #46
HRC supports all of that.... MaggieD Aug 2015 #37
She doesn't support all of that. Her plan is quite different than O'Malley's. Vattel Aug 2015 #40
Well tell me what is listed that she doesn't support MaggieD Aug 2015 #41
This, for example: Vattel Aug 2015 #42
That's not under the control of the president MaggieD Aug 2015 #43
Did you read the last part? Vattel Aug 2015 #44
Same with her plan MaggieD Aug 2015 #45
My mistake Vattel Aug 2015 #47
Thanks Maggie, community colleges provide great programs and allows a person to remain in Thinkingabout Aug 2015 #51
 

short circuit

(145 posts)
1. Uh no. It doesn't say how it's going to get paid for.
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 06:52 PM
Aug 2015

It's just fluff and no actual policies - what about old student loans? Are they going to be ever retired?

Come on, it's not enough.

ETA:http://feelthebern.org/bernie-sanders-on-education/#college-tuition

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
2. Yes it does - read again
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 06:53 PM
Aug 2015

"Clinton's plan would be paid for by limiting the tax deductions and credits available to high-income taxpayers."

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
5. Of course it does...
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 08:27 PM
Aug 2015

You know what DOESNT help the poor? Bernie's proposal for free college for "qualified" young kids. You know why? Because it's not accompanied by a plan to help poor kids get "qualified" in the first place. IMO, it's a naked pander to middle class white kids and their parents who enjoy the privilege of going to decent k-12 schools.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
13. Qualified students can attend college
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 11:15 PM
Aug 2015

It has been that way since time immemorial and will continue until college ceases to exist

Your problem isn't with Bernie, it's with reality.

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
15. I think making sure we are helping minorities be qualified.
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 11:21 PM
Aug 2015

... Is one of the keys to addressing poverty. Without that his proposals on college do nothing for minorities stuck in failing, underfunded schools. His focus is the middle class white voter. At least that's the appearance to me.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
18. A GED will work
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 11:33 PM
Aug 2015

I barely made it past the 7th grade. I eventually got a GED. With the GED I was qualified to get into Jr College. When I transferred from Community College to the University, I had to be qualified (High enough GPA) to get in. That is how it works.

If I can get in anyone can get in. Paying for it is the big problem.

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
19. Why not just fund K-12 so they can...
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 11:39 PM
Aug 2015

.... Just go straight to college AND be able to make it through college?

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
20. You do it all
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 11:42 PM
Aug 2015

But getting in isn't the problem. It's paying for it that's the problem.

33$ are you kidding me? My monthly loan payment is over $500. 33 dollars barely puts a dent in it.

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
32. On what data do you base that belief?
Wed Aug 26, 2015, 01:26 PM
Aug 2015

As to your personal loan repayment, that is about double the average, and about three times the mean monthly student loan payment. Since the proposed plan is based on lowering interest rates (to essentially non-profit status), YOUR savings would be 3x the amount cited in the article.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
34. What belief?
Wed Aug 26, 2015, 01:33 PM
Aug 2015

I have a $30k loan just like in the article.

My payments were about $217 until 5 months ago when they decided I wasn't paying it back fast enough so they essentially doubled it.

$33 is nothing. And if it were tripled it would still barely make a dent in what I pay now.

 

SonderWoman

(1,169 posts)
4. KNR! An actual policy proposal that can work.
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 08:15 PM
Aug 2015

Unlike the "big, bold, and....unrealistic" proposals from some others. I think she'll choose Warren as her VP.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
21. wouldnt that be over the top awesome. i had never considered that. a woman pres and vp
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 11:46 PM
Aug 2015

THAT would be exciting. and the dynamic warren. the mouthy warren. lol

oh, two very strong and vocal women

JackInGreen

(2,975 posts)
7. It's a work of performance art
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 08:39 PM
Aug 2015
watching you twist to make hillaries plans appealing is wonderful, Always a joy to behold. Love the subtle race baiting too. Keep up the good work.



Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
9. Seriously?
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 09:28 PM
Aug 2015

"A Massachusetts borrower who is paying 6.8 percent interest on $30,000 in loans would see his monthly payments fall by up to $33, according to the Clinton campaign."

Wow, as much as a whopping 33 bucks? Well, that'll help pay for one small bag of groceries.

I realize that usury isn't going away anytime soon, unfortunately. But c'mon, college could easily be made free just by cutting military spending or by raising taxes on the wealthiest. The US to this day has some 800 military bases around the world--a massive waste of money. "Up to 33 bucks." I'd laugh if it wasn't so pathetic.

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
16. It matches the Warren proposal
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 11:24 PM
Aug 2015

Dors Bernie have some plan just to forgive the debt? I don't think the government has the ability to do that, legally. Do you?

Even the banks had to pay back their loans, right?

 

Roy Ellefson

(279 posts)
10. Only student loan relief plan I support
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 09:46 PM
Aug 2015

Only student loan relief plan I support is one that forgives all loans and offers free college tuition going forward. If we can bail out the bankers we can bail out students and for every asshole who whines because they don't get a similar bailout, send them some cash...why not? it would be stimulative and helluvalot cheaper than bailing out wall street.

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
12. Her plan includes the Warren proposal to....
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 11:01 PM
Aug 2015

Allow refinancing of student debt at lower rates. And she has long supported repayment as a percentage of earnings when loan repayment comes due.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
22. The bankers we bailed out paid us back
Wed Aug 26, 2015, 03:35 AM
Aug 2015

The government made money off of that. That's why we couldn't take that money and use it to pay off people's mortgages or student loans.

postatomic

(1,771 posts)
11. Very reasonable and viable
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 10:55 PM
Aug 2015

And it isn't being funded by the 'pot of gold at the end of the rainbow'.

This is really needed and one more (of many) reason to support Hillary.

ljm2002

(10,751 posts)
25. Both Bernie's and Hillary's plans...
Wed Aug 26, 2015, 10:59 AM
Aug 2015

...depend on changes to the tax code: Bernie would put a small transaction tax on Wall Street's high speed trades and Hillary would limit tax deductions for affluent taxpayers. IOW, each candidate has stated an explicit mechanism to fund their proposal.

So how is one pie-in-the-sky while the other one is realistic? Obviously both depend on getting the desired tax changes through Congress which will be an uphill battle for either candidate should they become President.

postatomic

(1,771 posts)
48. Under the terms you have outlined
Thu Aug 27, 2015, 03:03 AM
Aug 2015

Neither plan will see the light day. I'm looking at what I consider to be more viable than the other.

That doesn't mean that it will make it through Congress. Who knows what evil the new President will have to deal with.

ljm2002

(10,751 posts)
50. So where did this come from:
Thu Aug 27, 2015, 10:40 AM
Aug 2015

"And it isn't being funded by the 'pot of gold at the end of the rainbow'."?

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
26. Colleges and universities have to bear some risk when graduates default on loans? That's a bad idea
Wed Aug 26, 2015, 11:52 AM
Aug 2015

Colleges and universities are already strapped for money. Will the colleges and universities have to make tuition higher to pay for their share of the loans that are defaulted on? Tuition has gone up largely because state support for colleges and universities has gone down. O'Malley did a good job in Maryland bucking that trend, but nationwide the trend continues.

Why should one student get free tuition for two years of community college when another student who is good enough to get accepted at a four year college right out of high school pays in full for her first two years of college?

We need to provide equal opportunity and reward merit. There needs to be a plan to ensure that minority groups such as AAs, Latinos and Native Americans have the same educational opportunities as Anglos. That would require, among other things, heavy investments in poor urban neighborhoods. The child who unfairly gets a bad early education is unfairly disadvantaged for life. Until we start fighting institutional racism by working towards true equality in early educational opportunity, success in higher education will be a privilege unjustly denied to countless members of minority groups.

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
30. Baseless allegation
Wed Aug 26, 2015, 12:14 PM
Aug 2015

Much of it has been her position for nearly a decade. Are you pissed that she listened to Warren and added her ideas to the plan? Because I think Warren was the sole member of the "focus group" you are imagining.

Now, what about Bernie's completely non-viable plan? What say you about that? Is it better to have a plan that has zero chance of passing? IOW, are the warm fuzzies better than actually helping people? I say no.

FSogol

(45,485 posts)
33. Actually you are wrong. O'Malley has the most comprehensive plan on College education.
Wed Aug 26, 2015, 01:32 PM
Aug 2015

It gives immediate relief to borrowers, rein in tuition costs, increases Pell grants, even allows for childcare for returning students, and much, much more.

Read the entire plan here:

https://14d2r744okfe40r1ug1oqm6y-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/OMalley-Debt-Free-College-Goal.pdf

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
36. I don't like O'Malleys plan too much, but it is comprehensive.
Wed Aug 26, 2015, 02:09 PM
Aug 2015

I like some of O'Malley's ideas, but O'Malley's plan presupposes that government needs to step in and help to run universities. Not a good idea. For example, freezing tuition rates immediately is bad idea that would throw a huge wrench into many universities' financial planning. Also, the idea that you can magically increase graduation rates, or timely graduation rates, by simply rewarding such increases or punishing failures to achieve such increases is really naïve. It reminds me of the silly no child left behind approach to education. Just demand success and you magically achieve it.

edited to add: I don't like Clinton's plan either. And I do think that O'Malley did a good job in Maryland keeping tuition from going up there without undermining Maryland's universities. So I think he generally knows what he is doing and maybe his "plan" is a bit over-simplified.

FSogol

(45,485 posts)
38. Rewarding graduation rates is more aimed at for-profit colleges, which are really horrible at
Wed Aug 26, 2015, 02:47 PM
Aug 2015

graduating students. I don't think it pre-supposes a Federal takeover, it is more intended for the States to rein in their public universities like Maryland successfully did. Private schools won't change as much.

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
39. In Maryland, O'Malley fought to keep state support for universities high.
Wed Aug 26, 2015, 05:14 PM
Aug 2015

That made the freeze on tuition doable. That was well-executed and kudos to O'Malley for that. But as President there is much less he could do. He could reward states with public funds if certain goals are achieved, but I get very nervous when that sort of approach is used to "reform" higher education.

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
37. HRC supports all of that....
Wed Aug 26, 2015, 02:11 PM
Aug 2015

But I will be honest, I have not spent much time paying attention to him. He's barely measuring in the polls, and I am not thrilled with what he did to policing as mayor of Baltimore or Gov of MD. Given my disinclination toward him he'd have to get more traction before I would spend time paying a lot of attention to his proposals.

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
41. Well tell me what is listed that she doesn't support
Wed Aug 26, 2015, 05:34 PM
Aug 2015

Like I said, I haven't paid too much attention to him for reasons I have previously stated. But please do let me know which of the things listed in the poster touting his plan's post that Hillary doesn't support. I am open to listening.

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
42. This, for example:
Wed Aug 26, 2015, 06:09 PM
Aug 2015

"Governor O’Malley is calling on states to immediately freeze tuition rates. . . . He is also calling on states to restore investments in higher education. As president, he would partner with states, leveraging federal dollars through matching grants to encourage states to increase funding for public colleges and universities."

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
43. That's not under the control of the president
Wed Aug 26, 2015, 06:13 PM
Aug 2015

So how can you claim it's a policy proposal? I thought you said his plan contained policy proposals that she does not support? I think what you mean is he is jawboning the states about things she isn't. Would that be more accurate?

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
44. Did you read the last part?
Wed Aug 26, 2015, 06:15 PM
Aug 2015

"As president, he would partner with states, leveraging federal dollars through matching grants to encourage states to increase funding for public colleges and universities."

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
45. Same with her plan
Wed Aug 26, 2015, 06:21 PM
Aug 2015

"Attending an In-state College Would Be Cheaper

The core of Clinton’s plan would allow students to earn a four-year degree from state colleges and universities without taking out loans to pay for tuition. She’d do that by providing federal grants to states, as long as the states up their investment in higher education. As tuition at public colleges has climbed rapidly in the past several years, state spending per student has fallen by almost a quarter, according the the State Higher Education Executive Officers Association. Families are now responsible for roughly half the cost of college. This federal-state partnership would account for more than half the cost of Clinton’s plan, about $175 billion."

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
51. Thanks Maggie, community colleges provide great programs and allows a person to remain in
Thu Aug 27, 2015, 10:55 AM
Aug 2015

their community and are easy to schedule classes around a person who works. We have to work for our future and getting an education in order to obtain better jobs and of course higher wages.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»HRC's college education p...