2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie might be surging in NH, but Hillary is the clear favorite among African Americans
Bernie Sanders vs. Hillary Clinton 2016: Where Candidates Stand With Black Americans
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) might be surging in a new round of New Hampshire polls, but when it comes to African-Americans, Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has been the clear favorite.
According to Gallup polling published Monday, the former secretary of state's favorability rating among black Americans was 80%, a 57-point margin over Sanders, whose approval among the group was 23%.
The survey concluded Clinton was "solidly positioned with blacks" and fared "better among black voters than any other Democratic or Republican candidate." According to Gallup, Clinton's name recognition likely played a role in her higher favorability, as did her serving in the Cabinet of the country's first black president.
Sanders' home state is 95% white.
Read more:
http://m.mic.com/articles/123775/bernie-sanders-vs-hillary-clinton-2016-where-candidates-stand-with-black-americans
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Although I probably should do a screen capture too, no? In case the way back machine doesn't get it in time.
bigdarryl
(13,190 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)Hillary has her ceiling, and her support is already receding from it.
immoderate
(20,885 posts)--imm
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Bernie appears to be doing well in NH, which is overwhelmingly white.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)so we will see.
ShrimpPoboy
(301 posts)The Clintons have history in the AA community and Bernie does not. We'll see if the momentum he seems to have can break that up a bit.
TheFarS1de
(1,017 posts)Bernie has no history with the AA community ? Are you serious ...... I feel dumber for having read your point .
ShrimpPoboy
(301 posts)Whether he has a history with anyone doesnt matter now because most voters dont know about it yet. Most people, who dont follow politics, are only now learning his name.
Hillary Clinton on the other hand is a household name everywhere and has been for decades. So he's got an ocean of distance to make up. If you don't believe that matters, it's not my post making you feel dumb.
6chars
(3,967 posts)I wonder how much AAs who are familiar with all the candidates are breaking in favor of each.
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)If not, can you please direct me to the correct forum?
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)Lately is more about Bernie Sanders not resonating with blacks, or his failure to "reach out to them", what ever the hell that means. Ever since that nonsense about Portlland, Maine a month ago, I'm disgusted with the whole business.
Bernie will do just fine.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)... and look at his numbers among people of color after Gore (who reached out)
Bernie is doing better now
LiberalAndProud
(12,799 posts)Beyond the whole majority of the minority position, which as statistics go, really tell us much about much.
The thing that bothers me about having this conversation with Bernie as the ignition point might be interpreted as an animus by black voters against Jewish men. When one brings religious affiliation into the mix, are we more or less informed?
To the protestors' credit, their agitation has agitated, so congratulations for that. But I wonder if old stereotypes are being revived, not as an instrument of resolution, but rather revolution.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)... what religion Bernie is?
Your friend Hillary sucks so vote for me isn't a good selling point imho
LiberalAndProud
(12,799 posts)We are taking black America's temperature as if the PoC vote were not as diverse, with as many diverse reasons for making their voting choices as white America. So this sort of monolithic thinking troubles me greatly.
I do think that as a voting block, Muslim Americans, to name one religious affiliation, aren't likely to vote for Sanders. I think there may well be some protestant Christian denominations who may claim that same prejudice. I'd be interested in knowing about that but the information, as far as I can tell, isn't available. Why is that?
Why aren't we taking polls to take the temperature of voters' religious affiliation as well as their ethnic origins? Because it doesn't fit the narrative, I suspect. I'm sorry if what I have said causes offense, but I'm feeling very manipulated by the current narrative. I'm sensitive that way.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)...first "president" (or vice president) who was of color was a native American...
I don't believe America as a whole has ever cared if a good leader is polka dot or from Mars just as long as they stand for them.
In this case Hillary is well known, spoke in MANY MANY community centers were PoC live and has a long relations a tad bad but mostly good.
I think it's more dismissive to intimate that time investment in relationships doesn't matter
LiberalAndProud
(12,799 posts)'s okay.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)I'm enjoying watching the talking points get dismantled one by one.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)seveneyes
(4,631 posts)Some do it as a monolith, others individually.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)robert reich's recent piece dismantling the "why bernie can't win" myths. he talks about the false racial divide
thread here
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251513996
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)mmonk
(52,589 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)walkthewalkorstfu
(25 posts)do with their life and time.
Closer to the elections next year, America will start to pay attention and the Bern will speads like wildfire, even in the South.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)1. He doesn't appeal to Latinos and blacks. Wrong. As his name recognition and message grow, Latinos and blacks are joining up because they recognize he's talking about the toxic interaction between racism and economic inequality. Last night's Sanders event in Los Angeles included large numbers of Latinos and blacks.
2. He's too far to the left to appeal to mainstream voters. Wrong again. Many who consider themselves conservatives are just as outraged by crony capitalism and abuses of power. Sanders is helping give life to an encompassing progressive movement to take economic and political power away from an elite that's rigged the system against the vast majority.
3. He's too old. Nonsense. He's only five years older than Hillary Clinton and two years older than Joe Biden, and anyone who's watched him zip around the country these past few months (usually by commercial aircraft) and give thunderous speeches know he's strong and vital.
4. He can't be elected. That's what they said about John F. Kennedy, referring to his Catholicism, and Barack Obama, referring to his race and his name. The "can't be elected" mantra is meaningless this early in the race anyway.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)I really like Robert Reich.
What he says makes a lot of sense. The OP
describes how things stand as of now.
The first primary is a long time from now, so it's entirely possible Bernie could pick up a large share of the minority vote.
mythology
(9,527 posts)Sanders polls poorly with minority voters as compared to Clinton. Saying that there were a lot of minorities (without defining what a lot is, or why this supposed large support doesn't show up in the polls, or even how he determined there were a lot to account for various biases) doesn't actually provide evidence of the claim.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)Last edited Wed Aug 12, 2015, 09:52 PM - Edit history (1)
Edited to add: "According to Gallup, Clinton's name recognition likely played a role in her higher favorability, as did her serving in the Cabinet of the country's first black president." Gee, ya think? Since only 33% of voters said they were familiar with Sanders and 92% said they were familiar with Clinton, it is patently obvious that name recognition played a role in her having a far higher favorability rating.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Democrats who defined themselves as very conservative Democrats. Likely, the kind of Democratic voters who went for Reagan.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)The point I was making is that there were only 8 of them who said they preferred Sanders to win the primary. That number is too small to tell us anything, but it was used to suggest that Sanders was somehow more appealing to very conservative voters or was courting very conservative voters or some such shit.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Vattel
(9,289 posts)John Poet
(2,510 posts)It's a snapshot in time. Nothing more, nothing less.
Doesn't mean it can't or won't change. Maybe it will, maybe it won't.
"According to Gallup, Clinton's name recognition likely played a role in her higher favorability,"
RUT ROH!!
Looks like Gallup is a "Racist" for bringing up name recognition as a possible factor here,
according to many other DU posters.... (whom I believe make quit a leap of logic with that, and are wound just a bit too tight)
kcjohn1
(751 posts)Only 33% are familiar with Bernie in that poll.
The more apt headline should be Hillary is widely known by African Americans and she is popular with them.
RichVRichV
(885 posts)33% know who he is and 23% view him favorably. If that trend stays and 95% learn who he is then 2/3s of the population will have a favorable view. I'd say that's not a bad place to be for the elections. It's all about getting the message out.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)primary to watch.
seveneyes
(4,631 posts)SMC22307
(8,090 posts)Part of the reason #BLM is in the streets has to do with Clinton Admin policies of the '90s, and yes, Hillary may not have been in office, but she was heavily involved.
JI7
(89,249 posts)SMC22307
(8,090 posts)JI7
(89,249 posts)Not just black people but she is popular among all minorities.
I saw this when i was campaigning for Obama.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)SMC22307
(8,090 posts)Concrete examples, please, I am interested in knowing this. What, as NY senator and then SOS, did she do for POC?
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)... of substance
daredtowork
(3,732 posts)uponit7771
(90,339 posts)... relationship with PoC and doesn't take it for granted we'll vote for her because she's Hillary!?
tia
daredtowork
(3,732 posts)radical break between social and economic causes so they can't see how economic problems contribute to their social problems - absolutely! This is exactly like "what's a matter with Kansas?"
Or are you saying that you consider the analysis of this book to be an insult, and all people in Kansas (including POC) were insulted by that book?
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)... ones cross but one does not solve the other.
Oprah Winfrey is discriminated against so even if PoC were wealthy economics wouldn't resolve the degrading effects of being racialiized.
Remember, we'd like to stop the effects of racism... not just have enough money to handle after the fact
daredtowork
(3,732 posts)Discrimination that started because of economic inequality became stereotyped and continued on even after people become successful. We STILL have to solve the economic problem as part of the approach to fixing that.
We can argue it all day.
In my view, persuading African American voters to ignore fixing the economic problems at the roots is a "What's a Matter with Kansas" moment. And sadly I suspect their "non-political" vote is going to be more about gay marriage and possibly abortion smuggled behind a promise to fix their purely "social" problem with police encounters - a promise that transcends party politics, as BLM as an organization does.
What's a Matter with Kansas? I wish people on DU would stop pushing it.
Stellar
(5,644 posts)Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)But there's still hope Hillary can get an endorsement from Tim Scott (R)...
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)You've been misinformed, which is really not surprising.
He formally endorsed Hillary over a month ago:
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/cory-booker-formally-backs-hillary-clinton-n384406
But Bernie is scheduled to speak at Liberty University.....maybe he really is going for the Tim Scott vote...
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Sorry.
This is an endorsement:
New Jersey Democrat Sen. Cory Booker has formally endorsed Hillary Clinton's presidential run, praising her actions on joblessness and criminal justice reform.
Booker, who endorsed then-Clinton rival Barack Obama in 2008, told supporters that he's backing Clinton just one day before his home state governor, New Jersey's Chris Christie, is expected to join the race for the GOP nomination.
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/cory-booker-formally-backs-hillary-clinton-n384406
Methinks you don't really know what an endorsement is.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)It had nothing to do with Hillary.
Hillary was not the subject of the conversation. They were discussing what happened to Bernie in Seattle. Not everything has to do with Hillary.
Cory has already formally endorsed Hillary. I'm sure he's quite comfortable of her support for minorities.
Methinks you still don't actually know what an endorsement is.
Keep going.....