Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1688 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WTF is this? (Original Post)
RT_Fanatic
Jun 2012
OP
WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)1. I don't know since I'm not a fan of Huffington Post and won't open the link.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)2. A link to the Huffington Post, that's what it is...
Seems self evident to me.
sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)3. I don't know
the guy that wrote the article used the term "leaked document" at least 4 or 5 times and linked to a 52 page missive filled with more legalese than a fucking murder indictment.
One thing he didn't do however was point out exactly what part of this tome is bad. He did say that a bunch of groups agreed that bad things are in it.
Typically lazy Huffington writing or intentionally misleading. I'm not going to work my way through that dry piece.
Sugarcoated
(7,733 posts)4. Wuh-oh Shaggy
. . . are you concerned?
FSogol
(45,532 posts)5. There have been 3 concerned posters posting this Huffpost RW drivel today.
Sounds like spreading this distortion is on someone's to do list.