Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

En Garde

(94 posts)
Sat Jul 18, 2015, 09:42 AM Jul 2015

For Clintons, a Hedge Fund in the Family

'...being part of the Clinton family has provided Mr. Mezvinsky with another perk: access to wealthy investors with ties to the Clintons.

When Mr. Mezvinsky and his partners began raising money in 2011 for a new hedge fund firm, Eaglevale Partners, a number of investors in the firm were longtime supporters of the Clintons, according to interviews and financial documents reviewed by The New York Times. Tens of millions of dollars raised by Eaglevale can be attributed to investors with some relationship or link to the Clintons...


Mr. Lasry, a co-founder of the big hedge fund Avenue Capital and a longtime friend and financial backer of both the former president and Mrs. Clinton, said he invested $1 million in Eaglevale. In an interview in his Park Avenue office, adorned with many photos of him with the former president, he said that he recommended that his relative by marriage, Craig Effron, another hedge fund manager, also invest in the fund.

“I gave them money because I thought they would make me money,” said Mr. Lasry, whose $13 billion firm was one of the first places Chelsea worked after graduating from Stanford.'

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/23/business/dealbook/for-clintons-a-hedge-fund-in-the-family.html

-----------

Yet Hillary won't support a $15 minimum wage hike. Shades of Mitt Romney...

35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
For Clintons, a Hedge Fund in the Family (Original Post) En Garde Jul 2015 OP
Bits and pieces of a NY Times article from March, that has been posted here many times... onehandle Jul 2015 #1
Given the news that hedge fund titans prefer Hillary to any Republican, this March 2015 NYT story... En Garde Jul 2015 #2
Is anyone surprised by this? InAbLuEsTaTe Jul 2015 #6
Historically, stocks perform better under Democrats. JaneyVee Jul 2015 #12
Is that why Wall Street has been so hostile to President Obama and supported Romney overwhelmingly ? En Garde Jul 2015 #14
Maybe she will HassleCat Jul 2015 #3
Yes, and maybe tularetom Jul 2015 #4
Friends, specifically HassleCat Jul 2015 #5
Is that why she refuses to support raising the minimum wage to $15/ hour? En Garde Jul 2015 #7
With some pressure, she may come around HassleCat Jul 2015 #8
Why does she, who charges $250,000 per speech plus private jet & 5 star hotel, need to be pressured? En Garde Jul 2015 #9
I don't know HassleCat Jul 2015 #20
I am not interested in gauzy supposition. En Garde Jul 2015 #27
It's gauzy ignorance HassleCat Jul 2015 #32
High stakes grifting. AtomicKitten Jul 2015 #10
Good description. En Garde Jul 2015 #35
Please, keep demonizing the rich. JaneyVee Jul 2015 #11
Nice right wing talking point ya got there... En Garde Jul 2015 #13
So...now is it ok to attack family members of candidates? Evergreen Emerald Jul 2015 #15
Write a letter to the NYT editor. En Garde Jul 2015 #16
No. I am talking about DU Evergreen Emerald Jul 2015 #17
I only report the facts which inform why Hillary is against restoring Glass-Steagall. En Garde Jul 2015 #22
Chelsea chose her profession as an adult. artislife Jul 2015 #18
So, we can attack Bernie Sander's wife? Evergreen Emerald Jul 2015 #19
If you must. artislife Jul 2015 #21
The common decency we have tried to abide by in the past has now been usurped Evergreen Emerald Jul 2015 #23
What common decency? PUMAs trashed the Obamas mercilessly "in the past". En Garde Jul 2015 #24
No one on DU trashed his family. Evergreen Emerald Jul 2015 #26
PUMAs were absolutely awful everywhere. I highly doubt DU was a bastion of highminded rhetoric. En Garde Jul 2015 #29
I don't know what a PUMA is...it sounds like a slur. Evergreen Emerald Jul 2015 #30
Spare me. En Garde Jul 2015 #34
Clutching your pearls? artislife Jul 2015 #25
What I am saying is that DU Evergreen Emerald Jul 2015 #28
Good night. artislife Jul 2015 #31
Nonsense. The OP is made up entirely of facts from a quite enlightening NYT article. En Garde Jul 2015 #33

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
1. Bits and pieces of a NY Times article from March, that has been posted here many times...
Sat Jul 18, 2015, 09:45 AM
Jul 2015

...and no link to that months old article.

 

En Garde

(94 posts)
2. Given the news that hedge fund titans prefer Hillary to any Republican, this March 2015 NYT story...
Sat Jul 18, 2015, 09:54 AM
Jul 2015

.... is relevant. They clearly know who will be good for their bottom line. In 2012, they sided with Romney over Obama. No wonder she is against restoring Glass-Steagall.

 

En Garde

(94 posts)
14. Is that why Wall Street has been so hostile to President Obama and supported Romney overwhelmingly ?
Sat Jul 18, 2015, 02:55 PM
Jul 2015
 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
3. Maybe she will
Sat Jul 18, 2015, 09:54 AM
Jul 2015

The Clinton campaign says it's mere coincidence that they're talking about issues such as income equality. As Clinton's associations with wealthy investors come to light, she may feel she and her friends have enough money, and it's time to pay attention to the working class.

 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
5. Friends, specifically
Sat Jul 18, 2015, 10:30 AM
Jul 2015

There are a few, very few, wealthy people who propose raising taxes on high income earners. Walt Disney's niece wrote a nice op-ed a few years ago, explaining how rich people did not "build that" by themselves to borrow phrase from the president. IN fact, maybe I'll go look for it and post it. Anyway, some of Clinton's wealthy friends may of this sort, although I expect most are, as you say, just interested in getting more money.

 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
8. With some pressure, she may come around
Sat Jul 18, 2015, 11:53 AM
Jul 2015

Of course, she will never admit that pressure comes from Sanders, even though it's pretty obvious. Instead, she will cite the party's history of affiliation with unions, working class Americans, etc.

 

En Garde

(94 posts)
9. Why does she, who charges $250,000 per speech plus private jet & 5 star hotel, need to be pressured?
Sat Jul 18, 2015, 01:48 PM
Jul 2015

Especially since she allegedly is so concerned about income inequality?

 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
20. I don't know
Sat Jul 18, 2015, 08:21 PM
Jul 2015

We tend to equate a luxurious lifestyle with disregard for the concerns of working people. That's probably a fair assumption but it is an assumption, so there may be exceptions. I think FDR was a good example of an exception. He was from a wealthy family, but loved by the working people. Hillary Clinton could be such a person.

 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
32. It's gauzy ignorance
Sat Jul 18, 2015, 09:00 PM
Jul 2015

I don't know if she is a typical rich person or not. I'm not too concerned right now, because I support Sanders, and I'm very confident he's not the typical guy who pals around with wealthy donors. As far as Clinton, I guess I'll fall off that bridge when I come to it. If I come to it.

 

En Garde

(94 posts)
22. I only report the facts which inform why Hillary is against restoring Glass-Steagall.
Sat Jul 18, 2015, 08:33 PM
Jul 2015

Mustn't hurt the bottom line of friends and family. After all, she is the choice of Wall Street hedge fund titans for good reason. They trust her to keep them safe from further onerous regulation.

Evergreen Emerald

(13,069 posts)
23. The common decency we have tried to abide by in the past has now been usurped
Sat Jul 18, 2015, 08:41 PM
Jul 2015

by Bernie supporters who now believe everything is fair game.

Evergreen Emerald

(13,069 posts)
30. I don't know what a PUMA is...it sounds like a slur.
Sat Jul 18, 2015, 08:59 PM
Jul 2015

I have not seen one Clinton supporter attack Obama's family.

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
25. Clutching your pearls?
Sat Jul 18, 2015, 08:50 PM
Jul 2015

Wow...no one should have said anything about Barbara Bush and her remarks about the Katrina displaced in the the stadium.

Is that what you are saying?
I didn't really like the word you used, "attacked" but I do say that everyone who is an adult is not above reproach.

Theoretically, if a candidate's spouse said they were against vaccines. No one in good conscience should voice an opinion counter to that?

They are not royalty.

Chelsea made a career choice. She married her spouse by her own accord. Unless there was an arrangement I am not aware of. /snark

Both choices are at odds with people who think part of the economic collapse in this century was partially caused by this profession. People are going to have opinions.

This tactic of taking what one person says and smearing across all the people in that group reminds me of how my Latino family is viewed by many in this country. I would really like it if you thought about this for even 2 seconds.



Evergreen Emerald

(13,069 posts)
28. What I am saying is that DU
Sat Jul 18, 2015, 08:58 PM
Jul 2015

Sanders supporters have been rabid in their attacks on Clinton. And apparently, there is no line they will not cross, even if it means going after Hillary's family.

Have a good night. I am going to go polish my pearls. You may want to clean your shoes.

 

En Garde

(94 posts)
33. Nonsense. The OP is made up entirely of facts from a quite enlightening NYT article.
Sat Jul 18, 2015, 09:00 PM
Jul 2015

Must have hit a nerve, eh?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»For Clintons, a Hedge Fun...