2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumPost removed
Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)safeinOhio
(32,676 posts)so I can decide myself.
thank you
petronius
(26,602 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)You should not be able to sue a third party for a legal sale to a federally checked business.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)For someone who claims to be standing up to corporate power, it's a clear act of hypocrisy.
Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)immunity. And in so doing, denied victims of gun violence the fundamental right of access to the courts. Sorry, but NRA talking points don't get him off the hook for this.
Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)HappyMe
(20,277 posts)I made my answer in the other thread (which was subsequently edited and hidden).
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)Harsh but not as bad as things HRC gets called here all the time with no hides. Politics is a tough game. I suggest the Sanders people get their big kid britches on if they think they can take on the GOP.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)A dishonest OP followed by a dishonest summary of the jury results.
Why not be honest?
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)Don't you be dishonest.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)I'll admit if I'm mistaken.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Gunz thread in GD, against rules. But I've got no respect for Gun Humpers. Yep, Gun Humpers.
Gun Humpers Gun Humpers Gun Humpers Gun Humpers Gun Humpers Gun Humpers Gun Humpers Gun Humpers Gun Humpers Gun Humpers Gun Humpers Gun Humpers Gun Humpers Gun Humpers Gun Humpers Gun Humpers Gun Humpers Gun Humpers Gun Humpers Gun Humpers Gun Humpers Gun Humpers Gun Humpers Gun Humpers Gun Humpers Gun Humpers Gun Humpers Gun Humpers Gun Humpers Gun Humpers Gun Humpers Gun Humpers...
That's what they are. Gun Luv is sick.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This is a dumb post but I say leave it there so everybody can see how dumb it is. Sanders is no more a gun humper" than my dog, he's exercising common sense.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Ridiculous and over the top post. You can't sue Ford if you get run over by one of their trucks due to an irresponsible driver behind the wheel.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Garbled gibberish apperently meant to stir shit? That's all it looks like to me.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Here's a big ole hide from me to you. Hope my fellow jurors feel the same way. Troll.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)that apparently loves saying 'gun humper'. The others...not so much.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)Specific names that Clinton has been called.
Apparently your britches need to be yanked up some too.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)HappyMe
(20,277 posts)Just thought I would ask.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)should gun companies be sued. Then the OP added Bernie Sanders: Gun Humper.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)or even any mention of a reliable source for this nonsensical smear.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)victims of gun violence. Common knowledge, public record. Google it.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)without a link to a reliable source.
It's "common knowledge" that on DU, that posting a LINK is a common courtesy
when posting an OP, if not a requirement of TOS
Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)4now
(1,596 posts)From the Slate article.
Bernie Sanders, Gun Nut
He supported the most reprehensible pro-gun legislation in recent memory.
When Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders jumped into the 2016 presidential race, he was widely hailed as a far-left socialist who would appeal to the liberal wing of the Democratic Party. A liberal challenge to Hillary Clinton, said Politico. True progressives liberal alternative, trumpeted FiveThirtyEight. But before liberal Democrats flock to Sanders, they should remember that the Vermont senator stands firmly to Clintons right on one issue of overwhelming importance to the Democratic base: gun control. During his time in Congress, Sanders opposed several moderate gun control bills. He also supported the most odious NRAbacked law in recent memoryone that may block Sandy Hook families from winning a lawsuit against the manufacturer of the gun used to massacre their children.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2015/05/bernie_sanders_on_guns_vermont_independent_voted_against_gun_control_for.html
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)4now
(1,596 posts)The PLCAA changed all that. Remarkably, the act wiped out gun liability laws in all 50 states, rendering them invalid except for a handful of narrow exceptions. (So much for states rights.) Thanks to the law, victims of mass shootings are barred from suing the companies that produced a wartime weapon that no civilian could ever need. With few exceptions, victims cannot sue a gun seller for negligently providing a semiautomatic weapon to a lunatic who shoots them in a movie theater. Even if a jury decides a gun maker or seller should be liable, the PLCAA invalidates its verdict. The law tramples upon states rights, juries rights, and fundamental precepts of Americas civil justice system. And it received Bernie Sanders supportin both 2003 (when it was first introduced) and 2005 (when it finally passed).
Right now, the families of Sandy Hook victims are searching for a loophole in the law, so they can sue Bushmaster for making the gun that sent 154 bullets through 20 children and six adults in 264 seconds. They will probably fail.
This is giving me something new to weigh with Sanders.
I'll be looking into this, which probably won't mean changing my mind about
supporting Sanders.
Snap. For a few months there I was beginning to think there was actually something
like a "perfect progressive candidate" for POTUS.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)puppet organization, and that's a fact unlike your assertion.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)That is what we are witnessing here.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)If they can find something factual like, he's a socialist, post that because it's the truth and some people don't like socialists.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)hell, would vote for him no matter who else is running
and i fucking HATE guns
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)I'm voting for Sanders.
iandhr
(6,852 posts)But there are apparently those who could do absolutely no wrong
TDale313
(7,820 posts)And not the first one from the poster. On ignore now. Debate is one thing, but this shit crosses the line.
840high
(17,196 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)So you should be able to sue a distillery when a bar sells to a drunk.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)And, yes, you can sue a distillery for whatever you want. Of course, if you bring frivolous lawsuits, not only will you lose, but you'll have to pay the defendant's legal costs. Is there any reason the gun industry should get special privilege? Of course not. Except that the NRA wanted it that way, and Bernie complied.
He owns this. And it completely undercuts his claim to be against corporate power.