Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 12:23 PM Jan 2014

The Largest Liberal Super PAC Just Formally Aligned Itself With Hillary Clinton

By Josh Voorhees

The will-she-or-won't-she narrative has moved one giant, big-dollar step closer to when-will-she. Here's the New York Times with the scoop from the land of Hillary Clinton's (as of yet) still undeclared presidential ambitions:

The largest liberal "super PAC" in the country has begun raising money to elect Hillary Rodham Clinton president, formally aligning itself with Mrs. Clinton’s undeclared presidential ambitions more than two years away from the election. The group, Priorities USA Action, which played a pivotal role in helping re-elect President Obama, also named new directors to steer the organization, appointments that will both cement the group’s pro-Clinton tilt and thrust veterans of Mr. Obama’s political and fund-raising operation into the center of the post-Obama Democratic Party.


Jim Messina, Obama's 2012 campaign manager, and former Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm will serve as co-chairs of the super PAC and its affiliated nonprofit arm. Granholm has been beating the Clinton '16 drum early and often. Messina, meanwhile, appears to be the big get here. With the announcement he becomes the most high-profile member of Obama's inner circle to openly back Clinton for president, and his new role will "only fuel perceptions that Mrs. Clinton’s potential candidacy has the tacit endorsement of Mr. Obama himself," as the Times' Nicholas Confessore puts it. (Despite the seeming inevitability of a Clinton White House bid, Messina and others are being careful to speak only in hypotheticals when it comes to the campaign. "Priorities is going to be there for her if she decides to run," he told the paper in an interview.)

As a super PAC, Priorities legally won't be able to coordinate its message with its candidate—although 2012 (and Stephen Colbert) showed that's largely an unenforceable technicality. There are other pro-Clinton groups already out there, of course, but none that can match the big-dollar potential of Priorities USA Action. While most of the others devote their energy rounding up small donors and building grass-roots support, Priorities spends its time convincing people to write six- or even seven-figure checks, making its formal alignment with Clinton a significant development in an election that's still more than two years away. Until—and even after—Hillary launches her bid, look for Priorities to do the heavy lifting when it comes to major ad buys both attacking potential challengers and defending her from conservative (and likely Benghazi-themed) attacks.

###

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2014/01/23/hillary_2016_priorities_usa_action_the_largest_liberal_super_pac_is_backing.html?wpisrc=newsletter_jcr:content&mc_cid=1c7fa17032&mc_eid=7a8b58c8c3
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Largest Liberal Super PAC Just Formally Aligned Itself With Hillary Clinton (Original Post) DonViejo Jan 2014 OP
If it's backing HRC it's not "liberal." polichick Jan 2014 #1
Sigh... gcomeau Jan 2014 #2
Hilary Clinton is liberal on social issues. stillwaiting Jan 2014 #5
So true - her presidency would continue what's been happening through... polichick Jan 2014 #10
She's not a liberal on a bunch of things that matter. This liberal won't... polichick Jan 2014 #7
Heads I win libodem Jan 2014 #3
Some deal huh? :) polichick Jan 2014 #8
And the biggest donors to this "liberal" PAC are the folks behind .... Scuba Jan 2014 #4
"Liberals" LOL! Wilms Jan 2014 #6
There is a large Ready for Hillary rally in Houston on Saturday Gothmog Jan 2014 #9
She is collecting the political capital needed...experienced staff and mega fundraising...to almost libdem4life Jan 2014 #11
Why the bellyaching? Beacool Jan 2014 #12
 

gcomeau

(5,764 posts)
2. Sigh...
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 12:32 PM
Jan 2014

Yeah, because that's what we need to keep the GOP out of the White House. internal battles over purity tests and whether someone passes them.

After all, look at the wonders the Tea Party has done for the GOP! Why not do it on our side too!?!?


You can disagree with Clinton's priorities and some of her positions, but she is still clearly a Liberal.

stillwaiting

(3,795 posts)
5. Hilary Clinton is liberal on social issues.
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 12:46 PM
Jan 2014

She is neo-liberal on economic issues. Her clear support for the TPP reveals this to be true.

Most Americans will NOT do better with her in the Executive and with her cabinet appointments. The trend we've been on for about 4 decades will continue.

At the end of a Hilary Clinton presidency the rich will be richer, the corporations will be richer, and wealth inequality will continue to amass at the top.

Now, an argument can be made that the Republican nominee will be worse, but that is really all we seem to be allowed to have in this country these days ------> Having to choose the relatively better choice from two bad choices.

polichick

(37,152 posts)
10. So true - her presidency would continue what's been happening through...
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 01:21 PM
Jan 2014

a long line of RepubliCon and Dem presidents - and that's bad news for most Americans.

polichick

(37,152 posts)
7. She's not a liberal on a bunch of things that matter. This liberal won't...
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 01:10 PM
Jan 2014

be voting for corporate Dems who think the TPP is a good thing.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
4. And the biggest donors to this "liberal" PAC are the folks behind ....
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 12:43 PM
Jan 2014

RENAISSANCE TECHNOLOGIES CORP, a hedge fund management company.

http://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/pacgave2.php?cmte=C00495861&cycle=2012


Nothing more liberal than a hedge fund, eh?

 

Wilms

(26,795 posts)
6. "Liberals" LOL!
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 01:08 PM
Jan 2014

Just some more Third-Way Hillarians.

Principals:

Bill Burton (co-founder): Campaign press secretary for Obama in 2008 who was later named White House deputy press secretary.

Sean Sweeney (co-founder): Former chief of staff to Rahm Emanuel, while he served as White House chief of staff.

Harold Ickes (president): Registered lobbyist with strong union ties who was formerly the deputy chief of staff to President Bill Clinton and who served in senior positions in the presidential campaigns of both Bill and Hillary Clinton.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
11. She is collecting the political capital needed...experienced staff and mega fundraising...to almost
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 02:24 PM
Jan 2014

insure a win.

Ironically, at the same time, the Republicans are in shambles and without a leader or a candidate. They don't have anyone in their pipeline, that I can see, who has been nationally vetted. That's a painful process, see Chris Christie. And in my recollection, it's not usually until after the primaries that the in-earnest expose begins. You can hide a lot of things in your home state, but the other 49 will find them out and may not be so forgiving.

The longer the Republican fissures exist, the longer she can wait and the more time the Republican donors have to search their financial hearts for what benefits their financing can bring. My sense is that it goes heavily to the downticket races to avoid not having a similar candidate shortage in 2016.

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
12. Why the bellyaching?
Thu Jan 23, 2014, 03:54 PM
Jan 2014

You all didn't have any problem when this PAC was raising money for Obama. So why shouldn't they choose to fundraise for Hillary?

"The group, which raised millions of dollars for President Barack Obama in 2012, named new directors to lead the organization: Jim Messina, who managed Obama’s reelection campaign, and former Michigan Gov. Jennifer M. Granholm (D)."

Having Messina aboard signals that some of the Obama campaign people are starting to line up behind Hillary, although she hasn't announced yet her intention to run.



Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The Largest Liberal Super...