Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 05:18 PM Feb 2013

Bob Woodward has lost it. He wants Obama to ignore federal law because its just a "piece of paper"

Here's what this hack said today on Morning Joe:

"Can you imagine Ronald Reagan sitting there and saying 'Oh, by the way, I can't do this because of some budget document?'" Woodward said Wednesday on MSNBC's "Morning Joe."

"Or George W. Bush saying, 'You know, I'm not going to invade Iraq because I can't get the aircraft carriers I need' or even Bill Clinton saying, 'You know, I'm not going to attack Saddam Hussein's intelligence headquarters,' as he did when Clinton was president because of some budget document?" Woodward added. "Under the Constitution, the president is commander-in-chief and employs the force. And so we now have the president going out because of this piece of paper and this agreement, I can't do what I need to do to protect the country. That's a kind of madness that I haven't seen in a long time."

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/02/bob-woodward-blasts-obama-madness-88160.html


There's some "madness" on display, all right, but I don't think it's coming from the White House.

In this case, Woodward is outraged because the deep sequester cuts to the Pentagon have interfered with the deployment of the U.S.S. Harry Truman, which will remain stateside due to budget constraints.

For Woodward, there's no reason for the president to be limited by a "piece of paper" or "some budget document." What the journalist is referring to, however, is a little something known as the current law of the United States.

In other words, Bob Woodward -- who used to go after presidents for breaking the law -- went on national television this morning to condemn a sitting president for not ignoring federal law.

http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2013/02/27/17117597-woodward-its-madness-for-obama-to-follow-federal-law
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bob Woodward has lost it. He wants Obama to ignore federal law because its just a "piece of paper" (Original Post) Cali_Democrat Feb 2013 OP
I seem to recall Dubya saying RedSpartan Feb 2013 #1
Why would Woodward care if the Truman remains homeported? Lasher Feb 2013 #2
All the President's men was written on Lint Head Feb 2013 #3
Actually Bob, I really wish Reagan, Bush, and Clinton had said all of those very things Downtown Hound Feb 2013 #4
Who needs the Constitution? Drunken Irishman Feb 2013 #5
"employs the force" Babel_17 Feb 2013 #6
LOL Cali_Democrat Feb 2013 #12
Wait. Was Bob Woodward actually on Nixon's side? intheflow Feb 2013 #7
Woodward is losing his marbles. Amonester Feb 2013 #8
The Budget Is Just A Piece of Paper? TomCADem Feb 2013 #9
Agreed..... Tippy Feb 2013 #11
A Naval Intelligence agent in journalist's clothing Gabby Hayes Feb 2013 #10

RedSpartan

(1,693 posts)
1. I seem to recall Dubya saying
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 05:27 PM
Feb 2013

that the Constitution was just a damned piece of paper. Shows what intellectual level Woodward is operating at.

Downtown Hound

(12,618 posts)
4. Actually Bob, I really wish Reagan, Bush, and Clinton had said all of those very things
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 06:08 PM
Feb 2013

It would have saved us all a lot of trouble.

Babel_17

(5,400 posts)
6. "employs the force"
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 06:57 PM
Feb 2013

As others have pointed out, Woodward seems to be conflating the powers of the President with those of a Jedi master.

It's the level of midi-chlorians that you're born with, Bob! Sure, training helps, but even taking the oath of office of POTUS does not a Jedi master make.

Confused, he is.

intheflow

(28,466 posts)
7. Wait. Was Bob Woodward actually on Nixon's side?
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 08:35 PM
Feb 2013
All this time I thought he was interested in reigning in abuse of executive power, but I guess All The President's Men was a hero-worship piece. Must re-read.

TomCADem

(17,387 posts)
9. The Budget Is Just A Piece of Paper?
Thu Feb 28, 2013, 03:51 AM
Feb 2013

Yeah, I am sure the House Republicans would let this one slide if President Obama simply starts ignoring congressional appropriations.

Gabby Hayes

(289 posts)
10. A Naval Intelligence agent in journalist's clothing
Thu Feb 28, 2013, 08:20 AM
Feb 2013

Suspicion about Woodward's selective reporting and his role in policy-making quietly dogged him for decades after Watergate. In recent years old hands like Russ Baker have begun to picture Woodward as an intelligence agent who infiltrated journalism and the United States government. It leads one to wonder if Woodward was also part of the Watergate and Iran Contra coverups. In any case it is time for him to lose his press card and White House privileges.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bob Woodward has lost it....