Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
Fri Dec 9, 2016, 11:04 AM Dec 2016

It's an "Outrage" That Judge Halted Michigan Presidential Election Recount

Constitutional Lawyer: It's an "Outrage" That Judge Halted Michigan Presidential Election Recount

On Wednesday, a federal judge ordered Michigan’s Board of Elections to stop the state’s electoral recount. U.S. District Judge Mark Goldsmith said he would abide by a court ruling that found that former Green Party presidential candidate Dr. Jill Stein could not seek a recount. Goldsmith concluded, "A recount as an audit of the election has never been endorsed by any court." Stein has pledged to continue to push for a recount. Michigan is one of three battleground states where Stein had demanded a recount. The other two states are Wisconsin and Pennsylvania. President-elect Donald Trump narrowly defeated Democratic presidential contender Hillary Clinton in all three states. For more, we’re joined by John Bonifaz, attorney and political activist specializing in constitutional law and voting rights. He was one of a group of leading election lawyers and computer scientists calling for a recount in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania.

TRANSCRIPT .........
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It's an "Outrage" That Judge Halted Michigan Presidential Election Recount (Original Post) Coyotl Dec 2016 OP
Every blue constitutional lawyer out there should be lending their expertise to Steins team Nwgirl503 Dec 2016 #1
+1 uponit7771 Dec 2016 #4
+2 iluvtennis Dec 2016 #8
The fact that they aren't is telling about the validity of Stein's claims mythology Dec 2016 #9
I would hope there has been at least some attempt Nwgirl503 Dec 2016 #10
By that logic, I assume you must be fine with the Benghazi investigation, with mythology Dec 2016 #15
Yes. Trying to ensure the integrity of an election is exactly the same Crunchy Frog Dec 2016 #17
Something got lost here Nwgirl503 Dec 2016 #18
There is a new crop of donate buttons online from this election, same old people as always Coyotl Dec 2016 #19
the top 1% class of this country heaven05 Dec 2016 #2
Can "Constitutional Lawyer" get a refund on his education? He deserves one. FBaggins Dec 2016 #3
I wonder why Clinton didn't request the recounts. JustABozoOnThisBus Dec 2016 #16
The recount was starting to overturn stones and people could see the ugly truth UCmeNdc Dec 2016 #5
And the state would end up going to Hillary with those 70,000 uncounted votes in Detroit... iluvtennis Dec 2016 #6
Those breakdowns helped Hillary, not Trump ChetSinger Dec 2016 #11
That depends on who resets the counters when, doesn't it? ucrdem Dec 2016 #13
That is wrong. It didn't count and actual vote for a person. It counted how many time it was boston bean Dec 2016 #14
Judge: "vulnerability of our system of voting poses the threat of a potentially devastating attack" Coyotl Dec 2016 #7
it's treason, that's what it is. nt TheFrenchRazor Dec 2016 #12
 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
9. The fact that they aren't is telling about the validity of Stein's claims
Fri Dec 9, 2016, 04:55 PM
Dec 2016

If the only people pushing the story of vote fraud are pushing their blog or their party, it may be they are just looking to get attention and the resulting clicks.

Nwgirl503

(406 posts)
10. I would hope there has been at least some attempt
Fri Dec 9, 2016, 07:04 PM
Dec 2016

Just based on the number of people who contributed to the recount fund and the twitter trending of #auditthevote and the number of people who are looking for anyway to block Trump's installation. But that's just pure speculation on my part. I don't have any info to back up whether there has been.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
15. By that logic, I assume you must be fine with the Benghazi investigation, with
Sat Dec 10, 2016, 08:55 AM
Dec 2016

investigating if Obama was a secret Muslim and/or born in Kenya, or if Jade Helm was a secret plan to put conservatives into camps. The number of people supporting an idea doesn't actually make the idea any good.

Crunchy Frog

(26,647 posts)
17. Yes. Trying to ensure the integrity of an election is exactly the same
Sat Dec 10, 2016, 09:16 AM
Dec 2016

as trying to prove, without any evidence, that the President is a secret Muslim born in Kenya.

Nwgirl503

(406 posts)
18. Something got lost here
Sat Dec 10, 2016, 11:06 AM
Dec 2016

My point was that based on the number of people who support the recount, I assume there are constitutional lawyers in amongst that group. Who could be lending their expertise to Stein.

I didn't say the recount was a good idea based on the number of supporters.

 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
19. There is a new crop of donate buttons online from this election, same old people as always
Sat Dec 10, 2016, 11:35 AM
Dec 2016

who make their living with web donate buttons and book selling. But not every one of them is a con artist, some are dedicated election integrity activists.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
2. the top 1% class of this country
Fri Dec 9, 2016, 12:58 PM
Dec 2016

want this fascist in office to halt any progress toward equality of all americans and to get them damn huge tax cuts,again. They rule this country and NO ONE else. Recount? Won't matter. He's in, we're out and in extreme danger of losing everything. Social Security, Medicare and the democrats, pelosi especially has me worried, they seem so weak and impotent at this time that I really feel they cannot protect from the RW hordes trumpfuhrer has unleashed on american people of color. Steve Bannon setting policy and running the WH while the trumpfuhrer is on celebrity apprentice, firing people. What a fucking circus that's going to be. . Shit!!!!!!! What a disaster.

FBaggins

(26,760 posts)
3. Can "Constitutional Lawyer" get a refund on his education? He deserves one.
Fri Dec 9, 2016, 02:14 PM
Dec 2016

Not only isn't it an outrage... judge Goldsmith (an Obama appointee) really didn't have a choice. The court above him had already said that interpretation of the recount law was a state court matter. Once the state appellate court had ruled, his hands were essentially tied.

For instance.. the "Constitutional Lawyer" claims:

This is a misreading of the state law


That doesn't matter... because it wasn't Goldsmith who interpreted state law.

It’s an outrage that the voters of Michigan will not have their votes properly counted.


This judge didn't rule that their votes wouldn't be counted. He accepted the state court's ruling that Stein couldn't request it. Clinton could have.

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,369 posts)
16. I wonder why Clinton didn't request the recounts.
Sat Dec 10, 2016, 09:10 AM
Dec 2016

Her campaign should have more money than Stein's, and she was the person who could actually benefit from a recount.

UCmeNdc

(9,601 posts)
5. The recount was starting to overturn stones and people could see the ugly truth
Fri Dec 9, 2016, 03:34 PM
Dec 2016

This election was rigged.

iluvtennis

(19,876 posts)
6. And the state would end up going to Hillary with those 70,000 uncounted votes in Detroit...
Fri Dec 9, 2016, 03:38 PM
Dec 2016

...magically 87 vote counting machines broke down on November 8th - yeah right, they broker down. I am so disgusted. Where are the Dems on this - Bernie, Elizabeth, Donna Brazile. I give Hillary a break as she can't jump on this for being called out as "not upholding the election results"

 

ChetSinger

(14 posts)
11. Those breakdowns helped Hillary, not Trump
Fri Dec 9, 2016, 07:53 PM
Dec 2016

Because of the breakdowns the machines were fed ballots multiple times. And the poll workers didn't reset their counters when that happened.

So the machines have too many votes in them, not too few. And those are mostly votes for Hillary. If Detroit is recounted Hillary's winning margin there will decrease, not increase.

Jill's work has indeed revealed problems in Detroit, but they helped Hillary, not Trump.

boston bean

(36,223 posts)
14. That is wrong. It didn't count and actual vote for a person. It counted how many time it was
Sat Dec 10, 2016, 08:04 AM
Dec 2016

Attempted to be run through the machine. That is why log books didn't match mumber of physical ballots.

And is now the reasons being used to not recount certain precincts.

 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
7. Judge: "vulnerability of our system of voting poses the threat of a potentially devastating attack"
Fri Dec 9, 2016, 03:39 PM
Dec 2016
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512649332

Judge’s order effectively suspends Michigan’s recount
Robert Snell and Chad Livengood, The Detroit News 1:28 p.m. EST December 8, 2016

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»It's an "Outrage" That Ju...