Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHow come the new Reuters/Ipsos hasn't made it to 538 yet?
Here's the post that tells us about the very good Reuters/Ipsos poll
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=2580463
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 794 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How come the new Reuters/Ipsos hasn't made it to 538 yet? (Original Post)
LAS14
Nov 2016
OP
Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)1. It is favorable to Hillary and that messes up Nate agenda.
budkin
(6,703 posts)2. State polling is what mostly changes the model
Nate is saying that although the national polls were good for Clinton, the state polls were pretty bad.
LAS14
(13,783 posts)3. They just showed up now.
But why the long lag?
LenaBaby61
(6,974 posts)4. LAS14 .....
I hope that Reuters/Ipsos poll doesn't make it over there.
It might sink Hillary to UNDER 60% at winning the presidency on Tuesday.
Stallion
(6,474 posts)5. 5 Straight Good to Great Polls added-No Change in Chance of Victory
something has gone wrong
vadermike
(1,415 posts)6. State polls
We're mostly bad not that I see wtf Nate ?