2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumReminder: "pussy" is a gendered slur. "Ugly" to critique a woman doing her job is a sexist insult.
Last edited Thu Oct 20, 2016, 07:34 PM - Edit history (1)
The normalization of this shit here is wrong- it's exactly what the GOP wants. This AM I caught three threads about how ugly and shitty women look. Nothing of substance- just ugly.
Edited to add- stop pretending there is no context and we are not talking about putting down women who are working as so unattractive. three threads did that this AM and had no comments on what they did- just their looks.
That is one degree away from Trump rating women from 1-10.
They are not there to delight your eyeballs, they are working
I don't care if they are GOP. It is still sexist. Let's not do this.
stopbush
(24,396 posts)And I really wish Bill Maher would quit using the words "pussy" and "bitch" to knock males.
Democat
(11,617 posts)Ugly is not gender specific.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)However, the context in which he uses a term like "ugly" seems clear and unacceptable. And "pussy", I believe, is really unreasonable to a lot of reasonable people.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Ugly has a lot more contextual issues. I can say Bachmann is ugly on the inside and would be perfectly correct. It becomes sexist when discussing appearances simply because we know society overall has put unobtainable standards on what a woman should look like.
That's why I got grossed out by a lot of threads and posts about how "lovely" HRC looked last night. And running the 23 yr old Vogue pix.
Seems utterly beside the point. How about if she was less "attractive"? What bearing would that have?? Those comments open up a venue wholly inappropriate to an election and women rights.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Women. People pretend there was no context but that's what they do. Comparing professional
women to tee shirts, wall paper, potential dates on tinder. Give me a break.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Of women working in the political system. I know there have always been a few people here who think "anything goes" when it comes to the GOP, but it still remains a deeply sexist and shallow way to treat working women. Same as Donald, people think rating the attractiveness of women is okay as long as they praise liberal women and only trash the GOP- they're missing the point it's all sexist. They are not here to visually please you. You don't see three active threads on men's looks ever. Never will.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)It's wrong on many levels.
But I'll open that up to include all women, not just those "working". Plus, that's an old standard nearly at this point. A few generations ago, sure. But now? "People work".
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Because that is germane to her work. But I'm sick of this "men too" cross when we know the rules have always been different for women. It's like saying all lives matter.
We women have borne the brunt of this crap for years. And I do think standards should be higher for the workplace, and also for DU. Women are saving this nation from the horror that is Trump. I think it's about time people realize we deserve their respect for what we say and do, as opposed to the shell we were born with .
Wilms
(26,795 posts)At this point, it's becoming so different in large swathes of society. Kid's growing up today in many places don't learn or suffer the commonplace disrespect of "the old days".
And I said kids. Not just girls. Because, ultimately, modeling sexism to boys is abusive. That was a world of unrealized potential.
I understand we have a long way to go, but we've come a long way. I think the battle cries are less called for. It's happening on it's own. I see youth today who, if not for a history lesson, would have no idea of the struggles of their grandmothers.
And that's beautiful.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Give for this level of disrespect. I deserve better and we've only come this far because people demanded better. In government and in the workplace we still have very far to go in terms of equal rights (reproductive freedom has seriously eroded) and opportunities and compensation. We are still so behind most other modern countries. Sugar coating it doesn't get us anywhere, respecting women as our equals does. It's a habit some DUers need to develop.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)But I disagree with a frame that's, "I deserve better". You have at least a number of males on this board that didn't frame it that way. (OK, easy for a guy, maybe.)
The male response here to sexism is more along the line of, "talking like that is pretty messed up...you oughtta know". It's not an argument anymore in a LOT of places. And it's not that women are welcome in the club. It's that misogynist are not!
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)And all of us at DU deserve better. Not all of em want it but screw that.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)First off, you missed the beat with your OP and had to edit to get it on track. So that skewed responses here and made you come off like the "I deserve better" frame that isn't really effective.
I'd like to think that Mineral Man pointed out a lot of stuff well and didn't argue it. Because most people get it.
Lotta anger in this world, betty. Gotta give the slip sometimes.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Concerned I am angry- it is that just a little poke because you need to rationalize silencing women? Because shit gets better when we all sit down and shut up? Nope.
You gotta love when people like yourself pick an argument and then accuse the other person of being pissy. Sorry if you've been reading the tone wrong. Not sorry I won't shut up when I see sexism or racism -it's not an option for me. I was raised to be better than that.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)TeeYiYi
(8,028 posts)Actually,...no. No I'm not.
TYY
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Last edited Sat Oct 22, 2016, 10:25 PM - Edit history (1)
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)At DU today.
Context anyone?
TCJ70
(4,387 posts)...there's a reason that certain men on those sites get the number of requests they do just like there's a reason certain women get the number of requests they do.
Ugly is not geared towards one gender or the other. It's the most unisex of insults.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)They are Donald Trump himself. It's got fuck all to do with dating sites. People here are rating these women as dogs- just like Trump does to WORKING WOMEN.and it's not okay. Context.
TCJ70
(4,387 posts)...that I've seen was a post suggesting Trump's campaign manager was looking rough. Understandable since those jobs are probably pretty stressful. I don't look at this site all the time so may have missed whatever you're talking about if someone literally said "She's ugly."
That being said, people make judgements based on appearance all the time and the behavior studied on dating sites is very revealing on just how widespread of a phenomenon this is. It's also likely that most of the women and men on those sites are WORKING MEN AND WOMEN.
The point is, people get judged on their appearances all the time. It's a thing we do. If someone thinks someone looks a little rough, as in the case I referenced earlier, that doesn't necessarily mean that they thing that person is bad or not good at their job. It may just mean they think the job is weighing on them.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Not everyone does it - many are aware the world is not a contest for you to judge. You've gotta be pretty dense to think that most people actually care to hear how you rate others.
TCJ70
(4,387 posts)And I never said anyone cared what I thought. Judgement is part of the human experience, right or wrong.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Enjoy staying firmly in the 20th century. Here in the 21st your thoughts on "hot or not" regarding working women are unwelcome most places - including here.
Do you even listen to yourself? You just accused me of being uppity. LOL. Grow up.
TCJ70
(4,387 posts)...for some so offended. You know nothing about me other than that I acknowledge people pass judgement based on appearances and you've relegated me to a 20th century, slavery and subjugation mindset. You've also posted zero links as examples of what you're talking about. You keep talking about context, but haven't provided any.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)And you're advocating that it's cool if you all behave as if this is tinder or something. Not sure what the hell you need links for, LOL.
Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Their work, it would be different. But DU was running a little beauty contest this AM. No better than that pic Trump.
MineralMan
(146,308 posts)It's just an insult and ignores all other aspects of a person other than appearance. But ugly does not apply to just one sex.
Both men and women can be characterized as ugly, but it's very rude and simplistic to do so. Ugly can also apply to a person's demeanor. It has nothing to do with the sex of a person, necessarily, so it's not sexist in itself.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)ugly
adjective ug·ly ˈə-glē
Simple Definition of ugly
: unpleasant to look at : not pretty or attractive
: unpleasant to hear
: offensive or disgusting
MineralMan
(146,308 posts)There are ugly cars. There are ugly houses.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)There is an unfair standard placed on women in society. Calling a woman ugly in no way has the same affect as calling a man ugly.
That is not to say one cannot call a woman ugly and not be sexist. It's kind of like porn.
MineralMan
(146,308 posts)a personal opinion about what is attractive, whether it's regarding a man or a woman. There is no objective measure of attractiveness. That's why it's a word that should be used vary carefully and with some explanation in referring to others.
There is no single standard of attractiveness. I can say that I find someone to be unattractive or not, but to what end? What does my judgment of that have to do with anything? Since such negative characterizations are taken as insults by the target, I cannot imagine any circumstances where such words should be used as descriptors.
I'm just not comfortable with negative assessments of people, when they are based on personal preferences. I do not like Donald Trump, for many reasons. I might say so, and have, in fact. But I prefer to use other adjectives that are more objective than ones having to do with appearance to make my point.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I don't think that is historically or currently accurate with respect societal views on women.
"There is no single standard of attractiveness."
I disagree with that as well when it comes to how society views women. Then again, it's the same thing.
"I'm just not comfortable with negative assessments of people, when they are based on personal preferences. I do not like Donald Trump, for many reasons. I might say so, and have, in fact. But I prefer to use other adjectives that are more objective than ones having to do with appearance to make my point."
I have read your posts for a long time. I believe you truly live this. That is one of the big reasons I have always respected you. I appreciate this paragraph and believe you live it.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Nothing else. And yes, it's sexist as fuck.
MineralMan
(146,308 posts)Without it we have no reference for posts that have little content. If you want to be understood providing context is necessary.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)You already knew this would refer to pols or pundits.... And that there is no excuse to rate these women's appearance SAME AS TRUMP DOES.
Context was here in spades. You overlooked it.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Here they are proudly comparing those women to wallpaper and tee shirts. Playing stupid. Pretending there is no context. Fuck that.
Cakes488
(874 posts)I don't agree that just saying the word pussy is automatically sexist.
MineralMan
(146,308 posts)insulting synonyms for vulva. I could write down a long list of them just off the top of my head, but will not. Almost all of them involve negative connotations. If a person speak in a negative way about a part of the female anatomy, then the word used becomes sexist, automatically.
Further, none of those are not synonyms for the word "vagina," either. The human vagina is an internal anatomical structure, which is not what all those synonyms attempt to describe.
If you are interested in such a list, I'll refer you to this link:
https://namingschemes.com/Vagina_Synonyms
We have perfectly good words in English that we use as non-loaded names for parts of the body. I suggest we use those. They have no negative connotations at all. They are anatomical terms.
You may not agree with me, but agreement is not what I'm looking for. So, it matters little to me. I'm speaking about how language is commonly used. Some usages are within the norm for polite speech. Others are decidedly not.
Cakes488
(874 posts)Hekate
(90,683 posts)....for your amusement.
Let's just say that Obama, Biden, and Trump all have penises. No one would ever call any of these men "a penis." It's something they have, not what they are.
When you call a man one of the euphemisms for the male or female genitalia, it is fully known to be a derogatory term for his personality and indeed his being.
Cakes488
(874 posts)I could easily use penis in a derogatory way if I want and most certainly have. So now you want to police all the derogatory terms? You want me to stop saying "Hey stop being a dick" because it's a male body part? What about stop being an asshole? That's a body part too. I think this is a slippery slope here. I understand you are offended but I (and a lot of other people) are not. So who is correct here? Who's views are right and more important than the other ones?
You are just going to have to accept the fact that some of us Democrats have a bit of Deplorable in them.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)We're sick of WORKING WOMEN being rated on their looks. Donald is in a heap of trouble for this- why would you think it is okay here. This is not Reddit or Jackpine and if you like using sexist slurs, have at it there.
Cakes488
(874 posts)argument. I have a different opinion about what is sexist and what is not. Rating a woman by just her looks or her body attributes yes is sexist...that's obvious. I don't think the word pussy is automatically sexist and neither is dick et al. You feel differently...that's fine I can understand it and can respect that, but you can't do the same for me. You are too busy trying to be righteous. This is the very thing that turns people off from liberals.
In a perfect world nobody would make fun of anyone else ever. Kelly Conway should not be called ugly or a piece of shit or the last 10 minutes of prom because she's a "working woman" ...well we shouldn't do it because she's a woman...period. And on the same token we should not be making fun of trump and his motley crew.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)About impressing you. Calling people a "pussy" is a gendered slut because it denotes weakness and associates it with women.
And you are missing the context that these working women are not there to turn you on as well. The sooner you figure that shit out the less you will sound like Trump himself.
Cakes488
(874 posts)a molecule of a fuck because you've completely missed the point. You know what else you can do if you don't like someone and don't agree...you can just block them out...that's right block out the opposition. So please feel free.
Pussy is a gendered slut?
And I see you didn't answer this: In a perfect world nobody would make fun of anyone else ever. Kelly Conway should not be called ugly or a piece of shit or the last 10 minutes of prom because she's a "working woman" ...well we shouldn't do it because she's a woman...period. And on the same token we should not be making fun of trump and his motley crew. Don't you agree?
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)You do apparently. If you don't understand the difference between starting threads Here at DU to denigrate working women's appearances and the "rest of the world" the. You should not have signed the TOS here.
We are here to work and demand the respect we deserve. We are here because it is NOT a perfect world but we have created a space here where women rightly assume their gender is treated with respect- and not judged like beauty contestants. If you want to be a jerk and fee like anything goes- 90% of the net is your playground. but here is a site striving to respect women's contributions, and you agreed to treat others here with her respect.
Cakes488
(874 posts)rated on scales etc???? I said that was obvious. And neither should men. Those dating app's are horrible with the ratings and the swiping. Did you miss that I said that? What are you arguing with me about because we agree on that.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)It's not there same. You keep acting like there is no predudice or context to this behavior- it's all the same as anyone criticizing anyone for anything they say or do. Bull shit. You are totally off base.
You might as well equate women with t shirts or wallpaper, like others here glibly have.
DLevine
(1,788 posts)DU has, or at least had, standards regarding the use of racist, sexist, homophobic slurs. I hope we can keep those standards here on this Democratic site.
Cakes488
(874 posts)of the pussy (or should say P word).
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)trumps quote. Now suddenly people are using it as the slur. It's the net, and some people
Forget we are not Reddit or 4chan. We are striving to make this place less hostile to women. Due to skewed moderation for a long time this place was hostile to women, POC and many Dems- including the president. Those assholes are gone now, as are their shitty support for slurring people.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)At least we don't have the old mod system.
Grey Lemercier
(1,429 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I have noticed a rather inordinate number of threads the past few days commenting on the appearance of Trump's spokesperson as if it were relevant to the campaign, to policy or anything else of actual substance.
But I tell myself that particular and petulant irrelevancy is often the best an undisciplined mind has to offer, and tend to temporarily accept the lowered bar of discourse they offer...
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Direct connection between that and Trumps way of evaluating women? its the exact same mindset.
obamanut2012
(26,076 posts)An insult like this against ANY woman normalizes it for ALL.
STOP IT, LIBERALS!
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)My mind is blown people are not learning this lesson from Trump. These are working women- let's judge them by the work they do.
madinmaryland
(64,933 posts)ecstatic
(32,704 posts)Trump was a deflated, ugly loser on meds.
I usually don't go there. It's a term I reserve for the most vile men. I called Trump ugly because it made me furious that he constantly assesses the attractiveness of women when he's a fat, fugly POS.
Cakes488
(874 posts)rip him a new asshole I can help with that too.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)After these professional women based entirely on their looks- and you know what? We've had decades of that crap, men have few experiences that compare. I don't know why people pretend it goes both ways with men. It really has not be close to the same.
RonniePudding
(889 posts)So I'm a sexist?
I'll give you pussy. I no longer use it. But people of both sexes can be ugly. The op's assertion is utterly ludicrous.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Reserve their right to be as much of an asshole as Trump is. Mind blowing.
athena
(4,187 posts)Then again, some people seem to be here just to find some way to attack someone.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Way about women who are doing a job. Fuck that.
athena
(4,187 posts)because one disagrees with her politics, or with the way she's doing her job, is very different from calling a certain type of wallpaper ugly.
If we were talking about any other minority (homosexuals, African Americans, Latinos), people would get this. Women are one of the last few remaining groups it's still OK to discriminate against, as long as one does it with a bit of subtlety.
DLevine
(1,788 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Tee shirts or dating sites. Some people want to reserve their right to be assholes.
DLevine
(1,788 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)And fuck that. We're not going full JPR here.
DLevine
(1,788 posts)And yes, JPR is a misogynistic cesspool.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Shit is ugly and hostile to women here. There is pretty much no difference between starting a thread saying "the pundit women looks ugly" and what Donald Trump does every day. And "pussy"- just because it be arm a word in the news.... It is still a slut used the way I am seeing it used again lately. I'm sorry, I'm not having it.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)I saw what those Jackpine Assholes did by trying to shame people here into not being SJWs and for a while this place was very very hostile to feminists, as well as POC. I'm really over it. Women are giving us a victory and I'm not shutting up and sitting down while this place gets dragged into the gutter again.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)our being. Things are definitely looking up for us all !!
Kennah
(14,265 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)I'd their "right" to behave disrespectfully to women that precious? I guess your reply is better than the one that compared women to wall paper....
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)Normalizing this shit here is beyond obscene. Just saw another thread here making fun of a woman's breasts (or drooling depending on the poster). I don't care who she was, if there is something to criticize about her actions or behavior then comment on that, not her breasts.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Because they had this theory that talking about social justice would some how stop you from talking about economic justice. How'd THAT work out for them?
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)she worked at. They had a program (guess loaded with dirty words) that they ran against employee emails.
She finally figured it out...her Mom from upstate NY wrote her and said "Me and Aunt Sophie are going out to pick pussy willows."
LexVegas
(6,060 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)tblue37
(65,342 posts)duffyduff
(3,251 posts)or anyplace else that claims to be liberal or progressive.
However, one should always remember that sexism spans the entire political spectrum, especially with men.
I know having lived through the 1960s and early 1970s. "Left" men are not by any stretch of the imagination exempt from being sexist jerks. In many cases, they are even worse than the jerks on the right.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Inclusive and thoughtful where the vast bulk of the net is dominated by bullying and childish behavior and rampant sexism toward women. You'd think Trumps recent fuck ups would give some pause, but the lesson is flying over their heads.
mercuryblues
(14,531 posts)I knew when the tapes came out that the P* word would get a lot of repeats here. If only because some could use the term without the backlash. IOW Trump gave them cover. I was not disappointed. This being a Democratic board I should have been able to feel comfortable viewing the thread titles. Seriously, what poster here would question what p* meant when discussing the Trump tapes? Why was it necessary to type out the whole word? Trump gave them cover and some ran with it.
At one point there were 5-6 thread titles on the latest page with the p* word in the title. That just reeks of hey ladies, come on in and join us. For me it said the person who posted the OP did not want a serious discussion on the tapes, they wanted their word porn.
And yes that leads the a backslide of commenting on women's appearance, then what next? ranking them on their fuckability?
So people just stop. Respect women enough where you think before you repeat the slurs others say. That is just giving the nod that it is ok for others to say it and worse.
Can we raise all ships instead of throwing stones at one to sink it.