2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWho is writing the TPP? Article By Elizabeth Warren and Rosa DeLauro
CONGRESS IS in an intense debate over trade bills that will shape the course of the US economy for decades. Much of this debate has been characterized as a fight over whether international trade itself creates or destroys American jobs. There is, however, another major concern that modern trade agreements are often less about trade and more about giant multinational corporations finding new ways to rig the economic system to benefit themselves. Hillary Clinton has said that the United States should be advocating a level and fair playing field, not special favors for big business, in our trade deals. We agree with this blunt assessment and believe every member of Congress should consider this carefully before voting to help advance these agreements.
Advocates of the pending Trans-Pacific Partnership, a massive 12-country agreement, sell this proposal as a free trade deal but the United States already has free trade agreements with half of the countries at the negotiating table, and only five of the treatys 29 draft chapters reportedly deal with traditional trade issues. While reducing traditional barriers to trade with countries like Japan will facilitate some international commerce, the TPP is about more than reducing tariffs.
The president argues that the TPP is about who will write the rules for 40 percent of the worlds economy the United States or China. But who is writing the TPP? The text has been classified and the public isnt permitted to see it, but 28 trade advisory committees have been intimately involved in the negotiations. Of the 566 committee members, 480, or 85 percent, are senior corporate executives or representatives from industry lobbying groups. Many of the advisory committees are made up entirely of industry representatives.
A rigged process leads to a rigged outcome. For evidence of that tilt, look at a key TPP provision: Investor-State Dispute Settlement where big companies get the right to challenge laws they dont like in front of industry-friendly arbitration panels that sit outside of any court system. Those panels can force taxpayers to write huge checks to big corporations with no appeals. Workers, environmentalists, and human rights advocates dont get that special right.
https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2015/05/11/elizabeth-warren-and-rosa-delauro-who-writing-tpp/2FQZAV6uz9GGQI6pe3cd0K/story.html
think
(11,641 posts)yup...
And the unions got to be invited just to be ignored. None of their ideas were incorporated and the union officials weren't allowed to see the documents or discuss it with their members.
Dog and pony show.....
The TPP is still just a corporate deal written by the corporations for the corporations.
~Snip~
The TPP, like many of the failed trade agreements that came before it, will cover issues including health, food safety, conservation and environmental protections, Wall Street regulations, labor rights, and a whole host of other issues that, under our system of government, would have to be debated publicly in Congress before becoming law. But because the U.S. government treats trade deals differently than all other policiesit is allowed to negotiate rules that affect our lives in these areas behind closed doors. This is undemocratic.
Ive heard labor has a seat at the table and gets to see the TPP texts. Is this true?
No. Under U.S. law, there are several trade advisersprivate citizens appointed by the Presidentwho advise on trade policies. Of these advisers, the vast majority (85% according to the Washington Post) represent businesses. About 5% of the advisers represent labor. The other 10% represent local and state government officials, academics, think tanks and non-governmental organizations. Labor advisers are allowed to review and advise on draft U.S. proposalsadvice that the United States Trade Representative (USTR) can freely ignore. But we are locked out of the negotiating room and cannot see the actual negotiating texts, which combine the proposals from all 12 countries and evolve over time as negotiations progress. Nor can we share what we learn with members without violating national security laws.
Ive heard USTR say the AFL-CIO is satisfied with the level of transparency in the TPP negotiations. Is this true?
No. We have been pushing not just for more transparency, but for a more democratic and participatory process since the beginning. The USTR has quoted selectively from AFL-CIO testimony about the TPP provided to Congress three years ago, when the TPP was still taking shape. At that time, we were very hopeful that our ideas for a more progressive trade agenda would be adopted into the TPP. Here is the entire quote in context:
Read more:
http://www.aflcio.org/Issues/Trade/Fast-Track-Legislation/Labor-s-So-Called-Seat-at-the-Table-at-TPP-Negotiations
swhisper1
(851 posts)Urchin
(248 posts)We the people are too unwashed to understand such complex ideas--we should return to our hovels and leave it to our masters to dictate to us what they deem is best for us.
And we're supposed to think TPP is a good idea because of this?
MisterP
(23,730 posts)heck, Warren and Trumka just endorsed all that and a ball of wax
90-percent
(6,838 posts)Arizona Roadrunner
(168 posts)As a person who has served on a local governments Board of Directors, I am VERY concerned about the TPP ISDS court process with results being the surrendering of governmental sovereignty to corporate interests, foreign and domestic.
Basically due to secretive deliberations, this judicial process is designed to favor corporate over governmental concerns and interests. This agreement should not allow corporations to use this judicial process, but should demand they use our existing judicial process as it relates to governmental entities. How many state and local governments can afford to be involved in such a process? Just by the threat of suits through ISDS, a climate where governmental units cave in will be created. Look at what has happened under NAFTA and the WTO as it relates to our right to know where our food comes from. Look at how a Canadian corporation is using NAFTA to sue the U.S. on the Keystone project.
This will mean that political topics such as minimum wage increases and housing and zoning laws may be pre-empted by just the threat of a suit through the ISDS process. Look at what happened with Egypt when a corporation tried to use a process analogous to the ISDS to prevent Egypt from raising their minimum wage laws. (Veolia v. Egypt)
Therefore, I recommend, in the national interest, this agreement not be approved. When people find out how this can be used to prevent them from finding out things such as where products are made, etc., there will be charges of treason and the political process will never recover the trust of the American citizens.
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)Bill USA
(6,436 posts)Investor-State Dispute Settlement where big companies get the right to challenge laws they dont like in front of industry-friendly arbitration panels that sit outside of any court system. Those panels can force taxpayers to write huge checks to big corporations with no appeals. Workers, environmentalists, and human rights advocates dont get that special right.
~~
~~
Economist Joe Stiglitz, Harvard Law professor Laurence Tribe, and others recently noted that the threat and expense of ISDS proceedings have forced nations to abandon important public policies and that laws and regulations enacted by democratically elected officials are put at risk in a process insulated from democratic input. That was exactly what Germany did in 2011 when it cut back on environmental protections after an ISDS lawsuit.
Congress will soon vote on whether to enact fast-track authority to grease the skids for the approval of the TPP and other upcoming trade deals. [font size="3"]Clinton has called for trade agreements to avoid some of the provisions sought by business interests, including our own, such as ISDS.[/font]
George II
(67,782 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Arazi
(6,829 posts)whilst overlooking her very populist, progressive past.
The TPP is shit. Anyone whose paying any attention knows this. Wake up people!
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.