Sat Jun 18, 2016, 06:04 PM
laserhaas (7,805 posts)
Dem Convention is a Week after GOPLast edited Sun Jun 19, 2016, 06:52 PM - Edit history (2)
Will things change when Trump is overthrown; and someone like Mitten's steps in?
GOP wants anyone (Any ONE) to run against Hillary, other than The Donald. Just sayin...... [br][hr][br] [center] [font size=6 color=burnt] UPDATE [/font][/center] This just in ...Romney's guy named RNC Rules Committee Chair https://pjmedia.com/trending/2016/06/18/romney-ally-named-convention-rules-committee-chair/ [br][hr][br] [center] [font size=6 color=navy] UPDATE No. 2 [/font][/center] Another Romney guy is now named as co-chair of the Rules Committee {MITT} Republicans Fill Crucial Posts Ahead of July Convention The Republican National Committee has found someone to do what could be an intensely challenging job in July: serve as chairwoman of the Rules Committee at the party’s convention being held in Cleveland.
Mickelson accepted the post amid reports this week of some delegates planning to block Donald Trump’s nomination. If such efforts gain traction, decisions made by the Rules Committee during meetings before the convention could have a big impact on how things play out. ------ Ron Kaufman, a longtime RNC committeeman from Massachusetts who is a Romney confidant, will serve as co-chairman of the Rules Committee. Somethin's a happen'n [br][hr][br]
|
85 replies, 3311 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
laserhaas | Jun 2016 | OP |
OKNancy | Jun 2016 | #1 | |
laserhaas | Jun 2016 | #2 | |
Lord Magus | Jun 2016 | #6 | |
laserhaas | Jun 2016 | #21 | |
Lord Magus | Jun 2016 | #41 | |
laserhaas | Jun 2016 | #47 | |
Lord Magus | Jun 2016 | #50 | |
John Poet | Jun 2016 | #36 | |
laserhaas | Jun 2016 | #37 | |
Lord Magus | Jun 2016 | #42 | |
laserhaas | Jun 2016 | #48 | |
moonscape | Jun 2016 | #78 | |
TDale313 | Jun 2016 | #3 | |
chwaliszewski | Jun 2016 | #51 | |
DemocratSinceBirth | Jun 2016 | #4 | |
TheCowsCameHome | Jun 2016 | #5 | |
Lord Magus | Jun 2016 | #8 | |
TheCowsCameHome | Jun 2016 | #11 | |
DemocratSinceBirth | Jun 2016 | #15 | |
GulfCoast66 | Jun 2016 | #79 | |
AgadorSparticus | Jun 2016 | #81 | |
laserhaas | Jun 2016 | #22 | |
stevenleser | Jun 2016 | #61 | |
laserhaas | Jun 2016 | #68 | |
stevenleser | Jun 2016 | #69 | |
laserhaas | Jun 2016 | #72 | |
stevenleser | Jun 2016 | #74 | |
laserhaas | Jun 2016 | #76 | |
Logical | Jun 2016 | #80 | |
laserhaas | Jun 2016 | #83 | |
Juicy_Bellows | Jun 2016 | #7 | |
Lord Magus | Jun 2016 | #9 | |
Juicy_Bellows | Jun 2016 | #12 | |
TheCowsCameHome | Jun 2016 | #17 | |
PoliticAverse | Jun 2016 | #20 | |
TheCowsCameHome | Jun 2016 | #10 | |
Lord Magus | Jun 2016 | #13 | |
laserhaas | Jun 2016 | #23 | |
musicblind | Jun 2016 | #34 | |
Juicy_Bellows | Jun 2016 | #35 | |
laserhaas | Jun 2016 | #38 | |
scscholar | Jun 2016 | #14 | |
DemocratSinceBirth | Jun 2016 | #16 | |
SFnomad | Jun 2016 | #18 | |
Lord Magus | Jun 2016 | #19 | |
laserhaas | Jun 2016 | #24 | |
Lord Magus | Jun 2016 | #40 | |
laserhaas | Jun 2016 | #44 | |
Lord Magus | Jun 2016 | #46 | |
laserhaas | Jun 2016 | #25 | |
vintx | Jun 2016 | #26 | |
swhisper1 | Jun 2016 | #27 | |
DemocratSinceBirth | Jun 2016 | #39 | |
MFM008 | Jun 2016 | #28 | |
laserhaas | Jun 2016 | #29 | |
TheBlackAdder | Jun 2016 | #30 | |
laserhaas | Jun 2016 | #31 | |
bigwillq | Jun 2016 | #32 | |
KingFlorez | Jun 2016 | #33 | |
Lord Magus | Jun 2016 | #43 | |
laserhaas | Jun 2016 | #45 | |
Lord Magus | Jun 2016 | #49 | |
tirebiter | Jun 2016 | #52 | |
Warren Stupidity | Jun 2016 | #53 | |
HereSince1628 | Jun 2016 | #54 | |
Warren Stupidity | Jun 2016 | #55 | |
HereSince1628 | Jun 2016 | #56 | |
laserhaas | Jun 2016 | #57 | |
Warren Stupidity | Jun 2016 | #58 | |
laserhaas | Jun 2016 | #59 | |
stevenleser | Jun 2016 | #63 | |
stevenleser | Jun 2016 | #62 | |
laserhaas | Jun 2016 | #65 | |
stevenleser | Jun 2016 | #67 | |
laserhaas | Jun 2016 | #70 | |
stevenleser | Jun 2016 | #71 | |
laserhaas | Jun 2016 | #73 | |
stevenleser | Jun 2016 | #75 | |
laserhaas | Jun 2016 | #60 | |
LiberalFighter | Jun 2016 | #64 | |
laserhaas | Jun 2016 | #66 | |
stevenleser | Jun 2016 | #77 | |
AgadorSparticus | Jun 2016 | #82 | |
robbedvoter | Jun 2016 | #84 | |
Mr Maru | Jun 2016 | #85 |
Response to laserhaas (Original post)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 06:09 PM
OKNancy (41,832 posts)
1. They are not going to get rid of Trump. They can't
The Trump people would go ballistic.
|
Response to OKNancy (Reply #1)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 06:12 PM
laserhaas (7,805 posts)
2. And that particular dynamic would prove the need.
They have to usurp Trump; and there's tons of hints it is on the way.
Our nation is already a laughing stock he's this close. The GOP may never recover. Plus...if they are able to manipulate the Electoral..to prevent HRC from getting the magic number Congress gets to pick the President |
Response to laserhaas (Reply #2)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 06:19 PM
Lord Magus (1,999 posts)
6. No there are not any hints it is on the way. Just wishful thinking.
No matter how much they might want to get rid of Trump they lack any ability to do so.
|
Response to Lord Magus (Reply #6)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 07:57 PM
laserhaas (7,805 posts)
21. So says the expert on RNC Rules
Dont think so
|
Response to laserhaas (Reply #21)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 02:40 AM
Lord Magus (1,999 posts)
41. The rules are pretty simple regarding pledged delegates.
Trump has far too many delegates to take the nomination away from him.
|
Response to Lord Magus (Reply #41)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 02:57 AM
laserhaas (7,805 posts)
47. You will swallow those words
![]() |
Response to laserhaas (Reply #47)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 02:59 AM
Lord Magus (1,999 posts)
50. No, I won't.
You, however, are likely to vanish once DU goes back to having rules.
|
Response to OKNancy (Reply #1)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 11:15 PM
John Poet (2,510 posts)
36. Trump's own delegates would have to turn against him,
and that isn't likely. Anyway most of them are likely committed ("pledged"
![]() |
Response to John Poet (Reply #36)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 11:23 PM
laserhaas (7,805 posts)
37. Yhats one if a dozen hypotheses
![]() |
Response to laserhaas (Reply #37)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 02:42 AM
Lord Magus (1,999 posts)
42. No, it is not a hypothesis. It's a fact.
Pledged delegates are required to vote for the candidate they represent on the first ballot. No matter how obsessed you are with this bizarre theory of Trump getting replaced at the convention, that doesn't change.
|
Response to Lord Magus (Reply #42)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 02:58 AM
laserhaas (7,805 posts)
48. Waste of time
![]() |
Response to OKNancy (Reply #1)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 09:30 PM
moonscape (4,318 posts)
78. That would be the lesser of their evils, though.
The Republicans have been hostage to the Tea Partiers, and now that they see what the TP crowd does, what do they have to lose?
They can stand for principle (dump Trump) or go along and be destroyed anyway, and more thoroughly. If they dumped the Trump, they could have an outside chance of taking the Presidency (don't think so, but a lot can happen before November). As it is, they lose the Presidency and most likely the Senate. What would the Trump people do? Go on a media rampage? Riot and burn in the streets? With his soaring unfavorables, and needing to campaign in Texas to find kindred spirits, I wonder just how much support he has left to carry any of that out anyway. |
Response to laserhaas (Original post)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 06:17 PM
TDale313 (7,758 posts)
3. It'll be Hillary v Trump
And the establishment Repubs and monied interests have already signaled if that's the case they're just fine with Hillary, tyvm. They'll leave their party to the crazies and continue the decades-long takeover of ours.
|
Response to TDale313 (Reply #3)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 03:42 AM
chwaliszewski (1,491 posts)
51. You may be truer than you realize...
The GOP could be on its way out simply because the DNC is being hijacked by Wall St. Don't think it's possible? Think again. The Party of Lincoln used to be liberals until the switch was made. This is an interesting read about political parties changing their philosophy. http://www.livescience.com/34241-democratic-republican-parties-switch-platforms.html
|
Response to laserhaas (Original post)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 06:17 PM
DemocratSinceBirth (98,711 posts)
4. The suggestion that the Trumpists would allow the nomination to be stolen from their guy
The suggestion that the Trumpists would allow the nomination to be stolen from their guy without violence is not moored in reality.
|
Response to laserhaas (Original post)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 06:17 PM
TheCowsCameHome (40,068 posts)
5. It won't be Trump.
Plan accordingly.
|
Response to TheCowsCameHome (Reply #5)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 06:22 PM
Lord Magus (1,999 posts)
8. It already is Trump.
Planning on the basis of fantasy would be insane.
|
Response to Lord Magus (Reply #8)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 06:25 PM
TheCowsCameHome (40,068 posts)
11. Insane is his game.
You and the Dems are going to get caught with your pants down.
|
Response to Lord Magus (Reply #8)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 06:34 PM
DemocratSinceBirth (98,711 posts)
15. Some of this aberrant nonsense
Some of this aberrant nonsense that the GOP will dump Trump in the hope of fielding a more ostensibly electable candidate and risk the wrath of his unhinged acolytes is the motivated reasoning of some supporters of Hillary Clinton's vanquished opponents who want to see her defeated.
Let not your heart be troubled. Hillary Clinton will hand any Republican nominee for president his or her rancid ass. |
Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #15)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 11:44 PM
GulfCoast66 (11,949 posts)
79. The sad last fantasy
That when the republicans ditch trump we democrats will see the light and turn en mass to the logical candidate...Bernie!!
What will their reaction be when(if) Bernie supports Hillary. Even more curious, if Hillary wins in a landslide, where do they go? |
Response to GulfCoast66 (Reply #79)
Mon Jun 20, 2016, 12:07 AM
AgadorSparticus (7,963 posts)
81. They will go to the land of buttercups where they will have to suck it up.
Response to TheCowsCameHome (Reply #5)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 07:59 PM
laserhaas (7,805 posts)
22. Exactly
At the barest onf minimums there must be some sort of terpitude clause, ambiguous enough to allow the powers that be ...some sort of out
|
Response to laserhaas (Reply #22)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 08:25 PM
stevenleser (32,886 posts)
61. There is. But once you hear it you will understand how unlikely it is.
There is one and only one way the RNC can get rid of Trump and its simple and also nearly impossible.
The rules committee meets at the beginning of the convention to determine the rules for the convention on all kinds of things including how the delegates vote. They could institute a rule that effectively disqualifies Trump from the nomination. Something like, "to receive delegate votes, you have to have held an elected office as a Republican." So, fine, they institute this rule. Simple right? Slight problem. For the rule to be accepted and put into force, a majority of the delegates to the convention have to approve it. That doesnt sound so bad right? Here is the problem, guess who has won 2/3rds of the delegates to the convention? Trump. And the people who are those delegates were selected by Trumps campaign for their loyalty to Trump. For Trump to be pushed out, his own delegates would have to abandon him en masse. And we would likely hear that something like that was afoot long before the convention started. No one would like that scenario more than me. I would camp out there just to watch it unfold. But it is extraordinarily unlikely. |
Response to stevenleser (Reply #61)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 09:05 PM
laserhaas (7,805 posts)
68. They've had year plus to plan this out
And Mitt wouldn't be getting his ppl into position, for no reason.
We'll soon see ![]() |
Response to laserhaas (Reply #68)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 09:06 PM
stevenleser (32,886 posts)
69. There is nothing to plan. They either can pull Trumps delegates over or not. nt
Response to stevenleser (Reply #69)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 09:13 PM
laserhaas (7,805 posts)
72. It is a contractual issue
And the odds are (given the nature of the beast and very recent manoeuvres) that Mitt is coming
|
Response to laserhaas (Reply #72)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 09:15 PM
stevenleser (32,886 posts)
74. Nope, and nope. Mitts not coming and its an emotional issue not a contractual one.
If the emotions of enough Trump delegates are won over to the side that wants to get rid of him, they can.
Otherwise they can't. |
Response to stevenleser (Reply #74)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 09:18 PM
laserhaas (7,805 posts)
76. The only thing emotional...is Trump not being in on it
Then ..the Donald will throw a national temper tantrum
And that's worth watching...also ![]() |
Response to TheCowsCameHome (Reply #5)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 11:45 PM
Logical (22,457 posts)
80. I agree! They are going to replace him!
Response to Logical (Reply #80)
Mon Jun 20, 2016, 12:18 AM
laserhaas (7,805 posts)
83. The press gave him $2 billion in free publicity
And that's now at an end
|
Response to laserhaas (Original post)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 06:20 PM
Juicy_Bellows (2,427 posts)
7. A possibility is that Trump bows out himself.
He could cite a litany of reasons. For example, he says I have to bow out due to medical issues and I want all of you to know that I fully support X.
This scenario is plausible in my opinion. Donald gets what he wants (never believed he truly wants the job) and the RNC gets to pick a better candidate. |
Response to Juicy_Bellows (Reply #7)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 06:23 PM
Lord Magus (1,999 posts)
9. Trump is far too egotistical for that. -nt-
Response to Lord Magus (Reply #9)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 06:26 PM
Juicy_Bellows (2,427 posts)
12. Few people are as narcissistic as the orange one but
he is for himself more than anything. The RNC approaches him and pitches this idea. He sells it to the public and he still retains a lot of power over the party without having to do much. He can get his crazy media idea off the ground sooner as well, I don't think it's outside the realm of possibility.
|
Response to Lord Magus (Reply #9)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 06:39 PM
TheCowsCameHome (40,068 posts)
17. Trump is far too egotistical
to run and wind up as a loser.
Between the GOP and his own ego, he will be gone. |
Response to Lord Magus (Reply #9)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 07:17 PM
PoliticAverse (26,366 posts)
20. What if they make him an offer he can't refu$$$$$e? n/t
Response to Juicy_Bellows (Reply #7)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 06:23 PM
TheCowsCameHome (40,068 posts)
10. Yup, he's know for deal-making
Watch for his biggest one yet.
|
Response to TheCowsCameHome (Reply #10)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 06:29 PM
Lord Magus (1,999 posts)
13. No, he's known for saying he's known for deal-making.
That's not the same thing.
|
Response to Juicy_Bellows (Reply #7)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 08:00 PM
laserhaas (7,805 posts)
23. Also a possibility
![]() |
Response to Juicy_Bellows (Reply #7)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 11:02 PM
musicblind (4,477 posts)
34. Medical reasons? He is the healthiest man to ever run for president in the history of the world!
Remember? ....
|
Response to musicblind (Reply #34)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 11:05 PM
Juicy_Bellows (2,427 posts)
35. Whatever excuse he gives will be a ruse.
You're right, he is the six million dollar man.
![]() ![]() |
Response to Juicy_Bellows (Reply #35)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 11:23 PM
laserhaas (7,805 posts)
38. A ruse...In Politics!
pshaw
|
Response to laserhaas (Original post)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 06:33 PM
scscholar (2,902 posts)
14. Sad to see the media forced it to be a week later
They always stand against us. Stand against us.
|
Response to scscholar (Reply #14)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 06:36 PM
DemocratSinceBirth (98,711 posts)
16. It is infinitely better to go last.
Response to scscholar (Reply #14)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 06:47 PM
SFnomad (3,473 posts)
18. What do you mean the "media" forced it to be a week later?
It's been tradition that between the Democrats and the Republicans that the party that is currently in power has their convention last. The last few conventions have only been a week apart ... though they have been as much a little over a month apart in the past.
|
Response to scscholar (Reply #14)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 06:48 PM
Lord Magus (1,999 posts)
19. The incumbent party always holds the later convention.
And holding the later convention is considered an advantage.
|
Response to Lord Magus (Reply #19)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 08:03 PM
laserhaas (7,805 posts)
24. Here...it gives an advantage
Of knowing what is currently
a mystery |
Response to laserhaas (Reply #24)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 02:39 AM
Lord Magus (1,999 posts)
40. It's not any mystery who the Republican nominee will be.
Quit pretending that it is.
|
Response to Lord Magus (Reply #40)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 02:55 AM
laserhaas (7,805 posts)
44. You're joking..right?
![]() |
Response to laserhaas (Reply #44)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 02:56 AM
Lord Magus (1,999 posts)
46. No, your nonsense about Trump being replaced is a joke.
You just don't seem to realize it.
|
Response to laserhaas (Original post)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 08:14 PM
laserhaas (7,805 posts)
25. I cant believe how obtuse, most are, to the deal Trump
The "Art of tge Deal" ...maker
Can Make For handing his delegates over to a better contender |
Response to laserhaas (Original post)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 08:16 PM
vintx (1,748 posts)
26. HRC supporters better hope to God it's her vs. Trump.
Response to vintx (Reply #26)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 08:27 PM
swhisper1 (851 posts)
27. true, or she loses
Response to vintx (Reply #26)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 11:25 PM
DemocratSinceBirth (98,711 posts)
39. Why?
By my count the Clintons are 11-2 in their battles with the Repukes. I like them odds.
|
Response to laserhaas (Original post)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 08:44 PM
MFM008 (19,698 posts)
28. They need to have their nose rubbed
into the steaming, stinking, fly covered pile that is Rump.
Frankenstein made this monster and they may be killed by it. They need an EPIC loss that puts them in a major minority and puts them in the same category as the WHIG party. Eat it gop |
Response to MFM008 (Reply #28)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 08:50 PM
laserhaas (7,805 posts)
29. The one possible positive of HRC v Donald
![]() |
Response to laserhaas (Original post)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 10:33 PM
TheBlackAdder (26,045 posts)
30. Good timing. Didn't the GOP steal Obama's thunder by having their 2008 convention right afterwards?
.
There was something that deflated the elation of that event. I kind of think it was the unveiling of Sarah Palin. . |
Response to TheBlackAdder (Reply #30)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 10:38 PM
laserhaas (7,805 posts)
31. Mitt is coming and hopes it will be GOP v DEM banter
So much so
Nobody will pay attention...to his Robber Baron (racketeering) record |
Response to laserhaas (Original post)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 10:46 PM
bigwillq (72,790 posts)
32. It has to be Hillary vs Trump
Unless death or disaster strikes either candidate. The people have spoken.
|
Response to laserhaas (Original post)
Sat Jun 18, 2016, 10:52 PM
KingFlorez (12,689 posts)
33. The new meme is Trump being overthrown
Trump isn't going anywhere. Sorry.
|
Response to KingFlorez (Reply #33)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 02:45 AM
Lord Magus (1,999 posts)
43. Some of the Bernie die-hards have latched onto this as something that would give him the nom.
Apparently they think that if the RNC decides to be completely undemocratic and somehow give the nomination to somebody other than the primary winner, the DNC will do the same and anoint Bernie as the nominee because...reasons?
|
Response to Lord Magus (Reply #43)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 02:56 AM
laserhaas (7,805 posts)
45. Much more logical than the position
Of our best is Clinton
|
Response to laserhaas (Reply #45)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 02:58 AM
Lord Magus (1,999 posts)
49. Nothing could be less logical than disenfranchising every voter by saying the primaries don't matter
and just anointing the losing candidate as the nominee.
|
Response to laserhaas (Original post)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 04:18 AM
tirebiter (2,412 posts)
52. I'm not that prescient but
water flows downhill and the political rivers are are flowing.
|
Response to laserhaas (Original post)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 10:32 AM
Warren Stupidity (48,181 posts)
53. You do understand that Trump has pledged votes
for a first round victory, right?
Barring an implausible withdrawal, the RNC woukd have to change the rules to keep him out and doing that would blow up their party. They are screwed. They are stuck with trump. |
Response to Warren Stupidity (Reply #53)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 10:46 AM
HereSince1628 (36,063 posts)
54. IMO some are turning to radical solutions
For them leaving the radicals of the tea-jad stranded and setting the ship on fire is a good thing
They don't want the party as it exists with it's infestations. The rescue of what I will call refugee republicans is almost assured as the dems juggernaut has been triangulating just upwind. |
Response to HereSince1628 (Reply #54)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 11:45 AM
Warren Stupidity (48,181 posts)
55. Still doesn't make sense to me.
They would be better off just sitting out the 2016 election, letting Trump go down in flames, and then resuming control in 2020. Blowing up the party would be a huge risk, one that could put the tea-ha dists in control permanently
The Bush-Romney wing will just sit this one out. The less powerful ones will go through the motions of supporting Trump. |
Response to Warren Stupidity (Reply #55)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 11:53 AM
HereSince1628 (36,063 posts)
56. Except that overall the Neoliberals are offered a chance to reorganize
into something that reaches a bit more to the right of dems to capture the republican center.
The NeoCons, Armitage, the Bushes... the list of people looking for haven in the NeoDems is startng to include 'traditional' republicans as well as what we once called movement republicans. Such a thing will irrevocably change the nature of political alliances as well as enemies lists. |
Response to Warren Stupidity (Reply #53)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 12:28 PM
laserhaas (7,805 posts)
57. Not true...executive privilege inside parties
is a matter of rules making per the ambiguity the rules provide.
Mitt wants to come and...obviously...any GOPr wants a run against the Hillary baggage machine As is eveident by the placing of a Mittens man to be Chairman of the Rules Committee In short order...we'll know...for sure |
Response to laserhaas (Reply #57)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 12:39 PM
Warren Stupidity (48,181 posts)
58. There are no ambiguities in pledged delegates
and votes needed for nomination. Trump has the nomination unless the unambiguous rules are unambiguously changed to take that away from him.
|
Response to Warren Stupidity (Reply #58)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 12:42 PM
laserhaas (7,805 posts)
59. There's ambiguities in the rule making process
Because Romney wrote new rules last time...he intends to change once more...this time
You really believe the party of shut down the natiin isnt prepared to shut down Trump? |
Response to laserhaas (Reply #59)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 08:29 PM
stevenleser (32,886 posts)
63. Romney had won the majority of the delegates, thats how he was able to do it. nt
Response to Warren Stupidity (Reply #53)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 08:28 PM
stevenleser (32,886 posts)
62. See my #61 above. Even a rule change probably can't be effected if they wanted to.
They are stuck with him.
He would have to do something so colossally bad that his most loyal followers, i.e. his delegates, would go along with a rules change that would disqualify him. |
Response to stevenleser (Reply #62)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 09:00 PM
laserhaas (7,805 posts)
65. You assume you are an expert in such things
And there are many other variables to consider.
Such as Trump really not wanting the job; and this is all a show...for him to hand it over. |
Response to laserhaas (Reply #65)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 09:04 PM
stevenleser (32,886 posts)
67. I assume nothing. I read up on it, which seems to put me at least one step ahead of you
I'm also not pretending I know what is going on in Trumps head.
|
Response to stevenleser (Reply #67)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 09:10 PM
laserhaas (7,805 posts)
70. Reading up on it, making a statement as if it is fact
Is either qualified (expert)
Or unqualified (not an expert). I..on the other hand...am...a expert on Pittens. And I've been telling ...everybody who would listen...that Romney is coming. His 2 gal & pal becoming Co-Chairs of the Rules Committee.. most certainly is indicative |
Response to laserhaas (Reply #70)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 09:12 PM
stevenleser (32,886 posts)
71. It's not that complicated once you actually read about it.
Using math as a metaphor, it's arithmetic, not geometry or calculus.
But you have to read it. |
Response to stevenleser (Reply #71)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 09:14 PM
laserhaas (7,805 posts)
73. Well...Ive already laid bets at 2..3..and 4 to 1 Mitts coming
And it looks like Christmas is also coming...early ..this yr
|
Response to laserhaas (Reply #73)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 09:17 PM
stevenleser (32,886 posts)
75. People lose bets all the time, particularly when they don't know the rules of the game. nt
Response to laserhaas (Original post)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 08:18 PM
laserhaas (7,805 posts)
60. Update numero dos
^^^^^
![]() |
Response to laserhaas (Original post)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 08:46 PM
LiberalFighter (45,548 posts)
64. If Trump doesn't drop out himself. The RNC is screwed regardless of what they do.
1) Trump is the nominee. Republicans refuse to vote for Trump.
2) RNC manipulate the rules to replace Trump. His supporters become enraged or just say the hell with it. See 3 below. 3) Trump drops out. RNC has to figure out who to nominate. Because it is late they are behind in fundraising and campaign organization. |
Response to LiberalFighter (Reply #64)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 09:01 PM
laserhaas (7,805 posts)
66. Mitt could raise a billion from 10 men
And he owns Clear Channel (iHeart)
|
Response to laserhaas (Reply #66)
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 09:18 PM
stevenleser (32,886 posts)
77. He could raise $100 trillion, it won't help him because he can't get the nomination. nt
Response to laserhaas (Original post)
Mon Jun 20, 2016, 12:16 AM
AgadorSparticus (7,963 posts)
82. Honestly, I don't see how they can possibly get rid of Trump.
Honestly, it would not be right. Republican voters overwhelmingly voted him as their nominee. To go with anyone else at this point is fascism. I hate the gop and everything they and trump stand for, but it was part of the democratic process of voting. Voting, for all of its issues, is the cornerstone of democracy and we have to adhere to it. He won the popular vote. The people have spoken and he needs to be their nominee.
And we need to work like hell to make sure that's all he will ever be. |
Response to laserhaas (Original post)
Mon Jun 20, 2016, 02:57 AM
robbedvoter (28,283 posts)
84. I voted "who cares" because there's no way GOP digs itself out of
the mess on their hands. I bet they wish they had super-delegates.
![]() |
Response to laserhaas (Original post)
Mon Jun 20, 2016, 04:51 AM
Mr Maru (216 posts)
85. GOP is stuck with that guy
Ryan is setting himself up to be "the great savior" in 2020. And then he can lose to HRC too.
|