HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Forums » 2016 Postmortem (Forum) » What are the chances that...

Mon Jun 13, 2016, 10:40 PM

 

What are the chances that Clinton incriminates herself during her upcoming FBI interview?

FBI: Did you intend to violate federal law when you set up this server?
Clinton: No.

17 replies, 3223 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 17 replies Author Time Post
Reply What are the chances that Clinton incriminates herself during her upcoming FBI interview? (Original post)
hill2016 Jun 2016 OP
w4rma Jun 2016 #1
Cordy Jun 2016 #13
w4rma Jun 2016 #15
peace13 Jun 2016 #2
Live and Learn Jun 2016 #3
RandySF Jun 2016 #4
eastwestdem Jun 2016 #9
Shemp Howard Jun 2016 #5
hill2016 Jun 2016 #6
Shemp Howard Jun 2016 #8
libdem4life Jun 2016 #7
Fumesucker Jun 2016 #11
PowerToThePeople Jun 2016 #10
Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #17
LineNew Reply .
RandySF Jun 2016 #12
Vattel Jun 2016 #14
leftofcool Jun 2016 #16

Response to hill2016 (Original post)

Mon Jun 13, 2016, 10:42 PM

1. Intent isn't needed to prove "gross negligence". (nt)

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to w4rma (Reply #1)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 12:08 AM

13. What Law?

Maybe you could explain that lil better, where are you getting gross negligence from? Who decides what is gross negligence? Why doesn't gross negligence require intent?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cordy (Reply #13)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 01:00 AM

15. 18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information

 

(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hill2016 (Original post)

Mon Jun 13, 2016, 10:42 PM

2. Unless flicking dandruff off her shirt is a crime..

 

..she will do nothing to incriminate herself.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hill2016 (Original post)

Mon Jun 13, 2016, 10:43 PM

3. More like, "To the best of my recollection, no." nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hill2016 (Original post)

Mon Jun 13, 2016, 10:45 PM

4. This is one of the dumbest op's ever.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to RandySF (Reply #4)

Mon Jun 13, 2016, 11:02 PM

9. Yes it is! nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hill2016 (Original post)

Mon Jun 13, 2016, 10:48 PM

5. She is a lawyer, so the chances are zero.

FBI: Did you intend to violate federal law when you set up this server?
Clinton: On the advise of counsel, I decline to answer that question.

FBI: Did you...
Clinton: On the advise of counsel, I decline to answer that question.

And so forth.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Shemp Howard (Reply #5)

Mon Jun 13, 2016, 10:52 PM

6. counsel

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hill2016 (Reply #6)

Mon Jun 13, 2016, 11:00 PM

8. Yes, thanks.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hill2016 (Original post)

Mon Jun 13, 2016, 10:58 PM

7. Only her aides will have to tell the truth...or go to jail. Meanwhile...

 

perverted political privilege protects powerful people.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to libdem4life (Reply #7)

Mon Jun 13, 2016, 11:22 PM

11. They should all take the fifth, tell the FBI to go and pound sand

The FBI is clearly on a vendetta against Clinton, are there no depths to which the vast right wing conspiracy will not sink?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hill2016 (Original post)

Mon Jun 13, 2016, 11:02 PM

10. What are the chances it matters?

 

She is the 1% candidate. They will not be denied their desires.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to PowerToThePeople (Reply #10)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 06:58 AM

17. Yeah and the fact she won

despite all the shite thrown at her by both Bernie Sanders and all the GOP candidates makes her the presumptive Democratic nominee.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hill2016 (Original post)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 12:01 AM

12. .

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hill2016 (Original post)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 12:18 AM

14. tiny

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to hill2016 (Original post)

Tue Jun 14, 2016, 05:40 AM

16. Tick tock!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread