Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What are the chances that Clinton incriminates herself during her upcoming FBI interview? (Original Post) hill2016 Jun 2016 OP
Intent isn't needed to prove "gross negligence". (nt) w4rma Jun 2016 #1
What Law? Cordy Jun 2016 #13
18 U.S. Code 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information w4rma Jun 2016 #15
Unless flicking dandruff off her shirt is a crime.. peace13 Jun 2016 #2
More like, "To the best of my recollection, no." nt Live and Learn Jun 2016 #3
This is one of the dumbest op's ever. RandySF Jun 2016 #4
Yes it is! nt eastwestdem Jun 2016 #9
She is a lawyer, so the chances are zero. Shemp Howard Jun 2016 #5
counsel hill2016 Jun 2016 #6
Yes, thanks. Shemp Howard Jun 2016 #8
Only her aides will have to tell the truth...or go to jail. Meanwhile... libdem4life Jun 2016 #7
They should all take the fifth, tell the FBI to go and pound sand Fumesucker Jun 2016 #11
What are the chances it matters? PowerToThePeople Jun 2016 #10
Yeah and the fact she won Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #17
. RandySF Jun 2016 #12
tiny Vattel Jun 2016 #14
Tick tock! leftofcool Jun 2016 #16

Cordy

(82 posts)
13. What Law?
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 12:08 AM
Jun 2016

Maybe you could explain that lil better, where are you getting gross negligence from? Who decides what is gross negligence? Why doesn't gross negligence require intent?

 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
15. 18 U.S. Code 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 01:00 AM
Jun 2016

(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793

Shemp Howard

(889 posts)
5. She is a lawyer, so the chances are zero.
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 10:48 PM
Jun 2016

FBI: Did you intend to violate federal law when you set up this server?
Clinton: On the advise of counsel, I decline to answer that question.

FBI: Did you...
Clinton: On the advise of counsel, I decline to answer that question.

And so forth.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
7. Only her aides will have to tell the truth...or go to jail. Meanwhile...
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 10:58 PM
Jun 2016

perverted political privilege protects powerful people.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
11. They should all take the fifth, tell the FBI to go and pound sand
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 11:22 PM
Jun 2016

The FBI is clearly on a vendetta against Clinton, are there no depths to which the vast right wing conspiracy will not sink?

Demsrule86

(68,039 posts)
17. Yeah and the fact she won
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 06:58 AM
Jun 2016

despite all the shite thrown at her by both Bernie Sanders and all the GOP candidates makes her the presumptive Democratic nominee.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»What are the chances that...