2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThe Biden rumor shows how out of touch the Dem Party Leaders are
So, if I am the Democratic Party, and I'm worried that Clinton might possibly have to drop her bid for President at the last possible second, and I loath Bernie Sanders then what should I do?
Pick Elizabeth Warren as her replacement.
There are a number of Hillary delegates who are incredibly excited to vote for the first female president. Is the Party really prepared to deal with these supporters on the convention floor and convince them to vote for a white male replacement?
I understand that many of Hillary's delegates would be loath to vote for Sanders. However, I also know that delegates are more "regular folk" and will not appreciate a system that is rigged by the party leadership.
In such a scenario, it seems much more likely that Sanders would be able to keep his delegates united and peel away a few hundred of Hillary's delegates who would be incredibly angry to lose the chance to vote for THEIR candidate.
Elizabeth Warren is the one person who might be able to peel away some Bernie supporters and Hillary supporters. She is also a much better choice in an election where the electorate is screaming for change.
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)That's it. No one aside from clueless pundits and message board folks are talking about Biden.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)I'm sure party insiders are concerned about the situation but not yet to the point of trying to line up and alternative. It would be expected that Biden would be on the list of possibilities if the concern grows.
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)And that was before Biden said he wasn't going to run.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)In their panic once Sanders started winning primaries.
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Back up for a second.
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)Nowhere does the article say the DNC ran it. The ad ran DURING the debate, but that's because Draft Biden bought the time.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)It's all there. DNC and all.
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Watch it
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)Draft Biden 2016 is a Super PAC that tried to get Biden to run. It shut down shortly after Biden said he wasn't going to run.
Why are you trying to misrepresent this? You already lied about the timeframe.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Watch it
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)Then I watched the ad they were talking about in the video. The ONLY mention of the DNC is that Biden met with them to discuss a possible run. Back in October of 2015. Before the first debate. Before he decided NOT to run. The video AND the article are from October, 2015.
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)The first primary was Feb 1, 2016.
I believe you are wrong.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Kentonio
(4,377 posts)It's '72 all over again, except this time they acted early instead of waiting until the convention to try and run an 'Anyone But' candidate.
It makes me laugh when people act as if the idea of the major Democratic figures trying to fix the race is some kind of wild fantasy. In 72 they actually tried to get a vote passed to overturn the winner takes all result from CA and hand nearly half the delegates to Humphrey to stop McGovern having enough delegates to win the first ballet. This kind of thing isn't new, or crazy or a conspiracy theory, it's just how people think and act in Presidential politics.
Anyone who thinks the DNC power players haven't had long and deep discussions about a potential replacement for Hillary if she's indicted are being painfully naive.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Kentonio
(4,377 posts)Do you really know absolutely nothing about the history of this party or indeed how politics has been conducted since it first existed? Putting forward a challenge to 'the establishment' is nothing more or less than a challenge to well connected and wealthy people's livelihoods and the power structures they have in some cases spent lifetimes building. When that happens, people rarely take that lying down, or indeed trust to the wisdom of the electorate to decide their fates.
Electoral shenanigans happen basically every election cycle, and yet people still act as if it's an insane fantasy. It really is no surprise that this stuff continues to happen with depressing regularity.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)losing the vote by a decisive margin.
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)There have been numerous irregularities in the road to this point though, which is why if she is forced to drop out I won't lose a seconds sleep over it. I also won't be in the slightest bit surprised when the party tries to parachute in a replacement, completely undermining any semblance of democracy.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)floating around, but there has been nothing that would call into question the legitimacy of the voting process.
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)But there's absolutely no point in covering that ground, because it's a waste of time. People like you would rather pretend political gaming of the system doesn't happen, or at least is only ever done by the other side.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)There is no rational basis for someone to conclude that Bernie received more votes.
It's all sour grapes denialism
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)The Democratic primary has precisely nothing to do with who receives more votes from the public and it never has. If you want to beat that drum, then you better start campaigning for a total restructuring of the system.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Just like in 2008, when Obama won the voting and thus became the nominee
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)But, Elizabeth Warren would be an acceptable replacement for Hillary if Bernie doesn't get the nod.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Means there would be a steep 'name recognition' hill to climb and Trump would be the next president.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Their aim is to preserve the corporate goose that lays the golden eggs.
Dems2002
(509 posts)This is exactly it.
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)Trump v. Hillary provides the illusion of choice. No meaningful difference, especially to the corporate types pulling the strings.
Samantha
(9,314 posts)He was really hoping she would jump in. When she decided not to run, he did. I really don't think Warren wants to run now. Biden, Clinton and Bernie all separately talked to her in private before the race heated up. She never revealed the details of the conversations but the press asked her about it and from her answer it seemed to suggest the subject under discussion for sure. This was months ago.
Have you heard her say she really loves the job she has now? I think she does.
Sam
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)It's only the Bernie or Busters that WANT something to happen with her candidacy.
Well, them and the Republicans, any way.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)And it came from the DNC.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/13/politics/democratic-debate-joe-biden-ad-draft-biden/
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)They were a group who tried to encourage Biden to run.