Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Dems2002

(509 posts)
Tue May 31, 2016, 03:26 PM May 2016

The Biden rumor shows how out of touch the Dem Party Leaders are

So, if I am the Democratic Party, and I'm worried that Clinton might possibly have to drop her bid for President at the last possible second, and I loath Bernie Sanders then what should I do?

Pick Elizabeth Warren as her replacement.

There are a number of Hillary delegates who are incredibly excited to vote for the first female president. Is the Party really prepared to deal with these supporters on the convention floor and convince them to vote for a white male replacement?

I understand that many of Hillary's delegates would be loath to vote for Sanders. However, I also know that delegates are more "regular folk" and will not appreciate a system that is rigged by the party leadership.

In such a scenario, it seems much more likely that Sanders would be able to keep his delegates united and peel away a few hundred of Hillary's delegates who would be incredibly angry to lose the chance to vote for THEIR candidate.

Elizabeth Warren is the one person who might be able to peel away some Bernie supporters and Hillary supporters. She is also a much better choice in an election where the electorate is screaming for change.

42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Biden rumor shows how out of touch the Dem Party Leaders are (Original Post) Dems2002 May 2016 OP
The Biden rumor shows that people like to spread rumors. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #1
Exactly. nt Cali_Democrat May 2016 #3
Possibly, but not one of us on DU knows exactly what's happening behind the scenes. BillZBubb May 2016 #5
And speculation like you just provided fuels rumors. nt Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #10
I didn't know I was so powerful! BillZBubb May 2016 #18
You mean like the DNC? AgingAmerican May 2016 #24
Draft Biden is the DNC? Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #30
The DNC started this, yes AgingAmerican May 2016 #31
Proof? nt Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #32
You replied to the post where I provided it AgingAmerican May 2016 #33
Yeah, that's just an ad. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #35
Watch the video AgingAmerican May 2016 #36
Paid For By Draft Biden 2016, Not Authorized By Any Candidate or Candidate's Comittee. nt Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #38
The video isn't an ad AgingAmerican May 2016 #39
The video is discussing that ad. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #40
The video isn't an ad, thus it is not paid for by Draft Biden AgingAmerican May 2016 #41
I did watch it. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #42
Also, that ad was from October of 2015. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #34
the 'establishment' is not spreading Biden rumors nt geek tragedy May 2016 #2
Of course they are, they're the ones setting up the Plan B in case the wheels come off for Clinton Kentonio May 2016 #4
16 more days of this stuff nt geek tragedy May 2016 #6
Seriously it's like talking to children sometimes. Kentonio May 2016 #8
Children believe in fairy tales, like the one where Bernie wins the nomination despite geek tragedy May 2016 #9
If it's a simple matter of Clinton winning more delegates then she should win the nomination. Kentonio May 2016 #12
"numerous irregularities"--there have been numerous Bernie supporter conspiracy theories geek tragedy May 2016 #13
Sure there have, including decidedly questionable acts by state Democratic officials Kentonio May 2016 #14
Clinton won fair and square, by getting a lot more votes. geek tragedy May 2016 #15
I never claimed he received more votes. Kentonio May 2016 #19
As of June 7, Clinton will have won the voting and will be the nominee as a result geek tragedy May 2016 #21
The establishment exists to further and preserve white privlege AgingAmerican May 2016 #20
It comes from the DNC aka the Democratic establishment AgingAmerican May 2016 #26
I keep seeing Sanders supporters talking about Biden. nt. NCTraveler May 2016 #7
I don't vote based on gender, ethnicity, wealth, or shoe size. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2016 #11
The fact she hasn't been running AgingAmerican May 2016 #17
It tells you that they would rather have a Republican win than Sanders AgingAmerican May 2016 #16
Exactly Dems2002 May 2016 #22
That's the truth. Jester Messiah May 2016 #29
Bernie waited so long to declare his candidacy because he was waiting to see what Warren would do Samantha May 2016 #23
The Democratic Party has no concern whatsoever about Hillary as the nominee. MohRokTah May 2016 #25
The panic and scramble to get Biden to save her started last February when Sanders started winning AgingAmerican May 2016 #27
Draft Biden is not the DNC. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #37
Um, that's not how this rumor got started. grossproffit May 2016 #28
 

Dr Hobbitstein

(6,568 posts)
1. The Biden rumor shows that people like to spread rumors.
Tue May 31, 2016, 03:27 PM
May 2016

That's it. No one aside from clueless pundits and message board folks are talking about Biden.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
5. Possibly, but not one of us on DU knows exactly what's happening behind the scenes.
Tue May 31, 2016, 03:55 PM
May 2016

I'm sure party insiders are concerned about the situation but not yet to the point of trying to line up and alternative. It would be expected that Biden would be on the list of possibilities if the concern grows.

 

Dr Hobbitstein

(6,568 posts)
35. Yeah, that's just an ad.
Tue May 31, 2016, 05:14 PM
May 2016

Nowhere does the article say the DNC ran it. The ad ran DURING the debate, but that's because Draft Biden bought the time.

 

Dr Hobbitstein

(6,568 posts)
40. The video is discussing that ad.
Tue May 31, 2016, 05:22 PM
May 2016

Draft Biden 2016 is a Super PAC that tried to get Biden to run. It shut down shortly after Biden said he wasn't going to run.

Why are you trying to misrepresent this? You already lied about the timeframe.

 

Dr Hobbitstein

(6,568 posts)
42. I did watch it.
Tue May 31, 2016, 05:25 PM
May 2016

Then I watched the ad they were talking about in the video. The ONLY mention of the DNC is that Biden met with them to discuss a possible run. Back in October of 2015. Before the first debate. Before he decided NOT to run. The video AND the article are from October, 2015.

 

Kentonio

(4,377 posts)
4. Of course they are, they're the ones setting up the Plan B in case the wheels come off for Clinton
Tue May 31, 2016, 03:54 PM
May 2016

It's '72 all over again, except this time they acted early instead of waiting until the convention to try and run an 'Anyone But' candidate.

It makes me laugh when people act as if the idea of the major Democratic figures trying to fix the race is some kind of wild fantasy. In 72 they actually tried to get a vote passed to overturn the winner takes all result from CA and hand nearly half the delegates to Humphrey to stop McGovern having enough delegates to win the first ballet. This kind of thing isn't new, or crazy or a conspiracy theory, it's just how people think and act in Presidential politics.

Anyone who thinks the DNC power players haven't had long and deep discussions about a potential replacement for Hillary if she's indicted are being painfully naive.

 

Kentonio

(4,377 posts)
8. Seriously it's like talking to children sometimes.
Tue May 31, 2016, 04:10 PM
May 2016

Do you really know absolutely nothing about the history of this party or indeed how politics has been conducted since it first existed? Putting forward a challenge to 'the establishment' is nothing more or less than a challenge to well connected and wealthy people's livelihoods and the power structures they have in some cases spent lifetimes building. When that happens, people rarely take that lying down, or indeed trust to the wisdom of the electorate to decide their fates.

Electoral shenanigans happen basically every election cycle, and yet people still act as if it's an insane fantasy. It really is no surprise that this stuff continues to happen with depressing regularity.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
9. Children believe in fairy tales, like the one where Bernie wins the nomination despite
Tue May 31, 2016, 04:12 PM
May 2016

losing the vote by a decisive margin.

 

Kentonio

(4,377 posts)
12. If it's a simple matter of Clinton winning more delegates then she should win the nomination.
Tue May 31, 2016, 04:19 PM
May 2016

There have been numerous irregularities in the road to this point though, which is why if she is forced to drop out I won't lose a seconds sleep over it. I also won't be in the slightest bit surprised when the party tries to parachute in a replacement, completely undermining any semblance of democracy.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
13. "numerous irregularities"--there have been numerous Bernie supporter conspiracy theories
Tue May 31, 2016, 04:20 PM
May 2016

floating around, but there has been nothing that would call into question the legitimacy of the voting process.

 

Kentonio

(4,377 posts)
14. Sure there have, including decidedly questionable acts by state Democratic officials
Tue May 31, 2016, 04:28 PM
May 2016

But there's absolutely no point in covering that ground, because it's a waste of time. People like you would rather pretend political gaming of the system doesn't happen, or at least is only ever done by the other side.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
15. Clinton won fair and square, by getting a lot more votes.
Tue May 31, 2016, 04:29 PM
May 2016

There is no rational basis for someone to conclude that Bernie received more votes.

It's all sour grapes denialism

 

Kentonio

(4,377 posts)
19. I never claimed he received more votes.
Tue May 31, 2016, 04:31 PM
May 2016

The Democratic primary has precisely nothing to do with who receives more votes from the public and it never has. If you want to beat that drum, then you better start campaigning for a total restructuring of the system.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
21. As of June 7, Clinton will have won the voting and will be the nominee as a result
Tue May 31, 2016, 04:32 PM
May 2016

Just like in 2008, when Obama won the voting and thus became the nominee

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
11. I don't vote based on gender, ethnicity, wealth, or shoe size.
Tue May 31, 2016, 04:15 PM
May 2016

But, Elizabeth Warren would be an acceptable replacement for Hillary if Bernie doesn't get the nod.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
17. The fact she hasn't been running
Tue May 31, 2016, 04:30 PM
May 2016

Means there would be a steep 'name recognition' hill to climb and Trump would be the next president.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
16. It tells you that they would rather have a Republican win than Sanders
Tue May 31, 2016, 04:29 PM
May 2016

Their aim is to preserve the corporate goose that lays the golden eggs.

 

Jester Messiah

(4,711 posts)
29. That's the truth.
Tue May 31, 2016, 05:00 PM
May 2016

Trump v. Hillary provides the illusion of choice. No meaningful difference, especially to the corporate types pulling the strings.

Samantha

(9,314 posts)
23. Bernie waited so long to declare his candidacy because he was waiting to see what Warren would do
Tue May 31, 2016, 04:52 PM
May 2016

He was really hoping she would jump in. When she decided not to run, he did. I really don't think Warren wants to run now. Biden, Clinton and Bernie all separately talked to her in private before the race heated up. She never revealed the details of the conversations but the press asked her about it and from her answer it seemed to suggest the subject under discussion for sure. This was months ago.

Have you heard her say she really loves the job she has now? I think she does.

Sam

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
25. The Democratic Party has no concern whatsoever about Hillary as the nominee.
Tue May 31, 2016, 04:54 PM
May 2016

It's only the Bernie or Busters that WANT something to happen with her candidacy.

Well, them and the Republicans, any way.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The Biden rumor shows how...